The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Constructing a broadly inclusive seed plant phylogeny
Open accessAbstract
Premise of the Study: Large phylogenies can help shed light on macroevolutionary patterns that inform our understanding of fundamental processes that shape the tree of life. These phylogenies also serve as tools that facilitate other systematic, evolutionary, and ecological analyses. Here we combine genetic data from public repositories (GenBank) with phylogenetic data (Open Tree of Life project) to construct a dated phylogeny for seed plants. Methods: We conducted a hierarchical clustering analysis of publicly available molecular data for major clades within the Spermatophyta. We constructed phylogenies of major clades, estimated divergence times, and incorporated data from the Open Tree of Life project, resulting in a seed plant phylogeny. We estimated diversification rates, excluding those taxa without molecular data. We also summarized topological uncertainty and data overlap for each major clade. Key Results: The trees constructed for Spermatophyta consisted of 79,881 and 353,185 terminal taxa; the latter included the Open Tree of Life taxa for which we could not include molecular data from GenBank. The diversification analyses demonstrated nested patterns of rate shifts throughout the phylogeny. Data overlap and inference uncertainty show significant variation throughout and demonstrate the continued need for data collection across seed plants. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a means for combining available resources to construct a dated phylogeny for plants. However, this approach is an early step and more developments are needed to add data, better incorporating underlying uncertainty, and improve resolution. The methods discussed here can also be applied to other major clades in the tree of life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability
Katoh, K., & Standley, D. M. (2013) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mst010 · Cited by 46,209
The global diversity of birds in space and time
Jetz, W., Thomas, G. H., Joy, J. B., Hartmann, K., & Mooers, A. O. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11631 · Cited by 3,934
Sanderson, M. J. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003974 · Cited by 1,977
Phylotranscriptomic analysis of the origin and early diversification of land plants
Wickett, N. J., Mirarab, S., Nguyen, N., Warnow, T., Carpenter, E., Matasci, N., Ayyampalayam, S., Barker, M. S., Burleigh, J. G., Gitzendanner, M. A., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1323926111 · Cited by 1,252 · cited 1×
“…rootward nodes that identify major clades using genomic and/or transcriptomic data with sophisticated analyses that can incorporate more complex evolutionary models (Wickett et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2015; Givnish et al., 2015; McKain et al., 2016; Comer et al., 2016; Walker et al., 2017).”
Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes
Shen, X.-X., Hittinger, C. T., & Rokas, A. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0126 · Cited by 520
Cited by
Impact of whole‐genome duplication events on diversification rates in angiosperms
Landis, J. B., Soltis, D. E., Li, Z., Marx, H. E., Barker, M. S., Tank, D. C., & Soltis, P. S. (2018) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.1002/ajb2.1060 · Cited by 359
GIFT – A Global Inventory of Floras and Traits for macroecology and biogeography
Weigelt, P., König, C., & Kreft, H. (2020) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.13623 · Cited by 268
Language extinction triggers the loss of unique medicinal knowledge
Cámara-Leret, R., & Bascompte, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2103683118 · Cited by 161
Preserving local biodiversity through crop diversification
Strobl, E. (2022) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/ajae.12265 · Cited by 37
Lindborg, R., Hartel, T., Helm, A., Prangel, E., Reitalu, T., & Ripoll‐Bosch, R. (2023) · Applied Vegetation Science · doi:10.1111/avsc.12729 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, S. A., & Brown, J. W.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-02-14
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 302-314
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2792688220
- Cited by
- 1,071
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 59.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constructing a broadly inclusive seed plant phylogeny. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajb2.1019
- The paper
- Smith, S. A., & Brown, J. W. (2018). Constructing a broadly inclusive seed plant phylogeny. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.