The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of whole‐genome duplication events on diversification rates in angiosperms
Open accessAbstract
Premise of the Study: Polyploidy or whole‐genome duplication (WGD) pervades the evolutionary history of angiosperms. Despite extensive progress in our understanding of WGD, the role of these events in promoting diversification is still not well understood. We seek to clarify the possible association between WGD and diversification rates in flowering plants. Methods: Using a previously published phylogeny spanning all land plants (31,749 tips) and WGD events inferred from analyses of the 1000 Plants (1 KP) transcriptome data, we analyzed the association of WGD s and diversification rates following numerous WGD events across the angiosperms. We used a stepwise AIC approach (MEDUSA), a Bayesian mixture model approach (BAMM), and state‐dependent diversification analyses (Mu SSE) to investigate patterns of diversification. Sister‐clade comparisons were used to investigate species richness after WGD s. Key Results: Based on the density of 1 KP taxon sampling, 106 WGD s were unambiguously placed on the angiosperm phylogeny. We identified 334–530 shifts in diversification rates. We found that 61 WGD events were tightly linked to changes in diversification rates, and state‐dependent diversification analyses indicated higher speciation rates for subsequent rounds of WGD. Additionally, 70 of 99 WGD events showed an increase in species richness compared to the sister clade. Conclusions: Forty‐six of the 106 WGD s analyzed appear to be closely associated with upshifts in the rate of diversification in angiosperms. Shifts in diversification do not appear more likely than random within a four‐node lag phase following a WGD; however, younger WGD events are more likely to be followed by an upshift in diversification than older WGD events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language
Paradis, E., Claude, J., & Strimmer, K. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 · Cited by 11,335
phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things)
Revell, L. J. (2012) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00169.x · Cited by 9,277
The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution
The Tomato Genome Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11119 · Cited by 3,289
Variation and Evolution in Plants
Stebbins, G. L. (1950) · doi:10.7312/steb94536 · Cited by 2,704
Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms
Jiao, Y., Wickett, N. J., Ayyampalayam, S., Chanderbali, A. S., Landherr, L., Ralph, P. E., Tomsho, L. P., Hu, Y., Liang, H., Soltis, P. S., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09916 · Cited by 2,226
Self-citationThe evolutionary significance of polyploidy
Van de Peer, Y., Mizrachi, E., & Marchal, K. (2017) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.26 · Cited by 1,775
Grant, V. (1981) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/gran92318 · Cited by 1,741
Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments
Zanne, A. E., Tank, D. C., Cornwell, W. K., Eastman, J. M., Smith, S. A., FitzJohn, R. G., McGlinn, D. J., O’Meara, B. C., Moles, A. T., Reich, P. B., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12872 · Cited by 1,685
Self-citationThe frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants
Wood, T. E., Takebayashi, N., Barker, M. S., Mayrose, I., Greenspoon, P. B., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0811575106 · Cited by 1,438
Self-citationThe Medicago genome provides insight into the evolution of rhizobial symbioses
Young, N. D., Debellé, F., Oldroyd, G. E. D., Geurts, R., Cannon, S. B., Udvardi, M. K., Benedito, V. A., Mayer, K. F. X., Gouzy, J., Schoof, H., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10625 · Cited by 1,275
Cited by
One thousand plant transcriptomes and the phylogenomics of green plants
Initiative, O. T. P. T. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1693-2 · Cited by 1,734
Polyploidy, the Nucleotype, and Novelty: The Impact of Genome Doubling on the Biology of the Cell
Doyle, J. J., & Coate, J. E. (2019) · International Journal of Plant Sciences · doi:10.1086/700636 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Landis, J. B., Soltis, D. E., Li, Z., Marx, H. E., Barker, M. S., Tank, D. C., & Soltis, P. S.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 348-363
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2800883607
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 96
- FWCI
- 32.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of whole‐genome duplication events on diversification rates in angiosperms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajb2.1060
- The paper
- Landis, J. B., Soltis, D. E., Li, Z., Marx, H. E., Barker, M. S., Tank, D. C., & Soltis, P. S. (2018). Impact of whole‐genome duplication events on diversification rates in angiosperms. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.