Cited by 32Youth Development and Social SupportChildren's Rights and ParticipationHigher Education Practises and Engagement

How High Schools Become Empowering Communities: A Mixed‐Method Explanatory Inquiry into Youth‐Adult Partnership and School Engagement

Zeldin, Shepherd, Gauley, Josset Sky, Barringer, Alexandra, Chapa, Brie·2018·American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Educational reform efforts emphasize empowerment and engagement, but these concepts are rarely translated into policy or classroom practice. This inquiry explores how schools can become places where students take ownership over their own learning. Phase 1 of this inquiry, a survey of students from diverse high schools, examines pathways to school engagement. Results indicated that youth voice in decision-making, particularly when the experience is situated within supportive adult relationships and a sense of safety, significantly predicts emotional and cognitive engagement. Phase 2, a case study of an exemplary high school, sought to explain these pathways. Grounded in the theoretical perspectives of "empowered community settings" and "youth-adult partnership," analyses highlighted the importance of a shared belief system and core instructional activities that were student-centered, affirmative, and strength-based. Within this context, the opportunity role structure allowed students to exercise voice in creating their own educational program. The relational environment offered partnership and safety for academic risk-taking. Teachers broke down traditional roles and power hierarchies in ways that helped students discover their own sources of engagement. The article identifies ways that community psychologists, as policy framers and as researchers, can help schools become places of empowerment and engagement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajcp.12231

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeldin, S., Gauley, J. S., Barringer, A., & Chapa, B.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Zeldin, Shepherd
Venue
American Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-02-12
Volume
61
Issue
3-4
Pages
358-371
ISSN
  • 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2770
OpenAlex
W2789987476
Cited by
32
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Spencer Foundation (#201700014)
  • University of Wisconsin Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Keywords
school engagement, student empowerment, youth-adult partnerships, high schools, emotional engagement, cognitive engagement, student-centered instruction, strengths-based education, relational environment, community psychology, educational reform
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cooperative Behavior, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Power, Psychological, Schools, Students, Focus Groups, Observation, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review