A Positive Youth Development Approach to Improving Mental Health Outcomes for Maltreated Children in Foster Care: Replication and Extension of an RCT of the Fostering Healthy Futures Program
Open accessAbstract
Highlights: Fostering Healthy Futures (FHF) is a preventive intervention for preadolescent youth in foster care. 95% of those offered FHF started the program, 92% completed it, and there was over 85% attendance. FHF reduced mental health symptoms, especially trauma, and mental health service utilization. Effects were consistent across almost all subgroups, suggesting FHF benefits diverse children. Positive youth development programming is acceptable and can be beneficial for vulnerable children.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Intervention research often gauges success through reduction in the use of subsequent mental health services, operationalized by decreased inpatient hospitalization, emergency room visits, and/or psychotropic medication use.
“Also at the system-level, intervention research often gauges success through reduction in the use of subsequent mental health services, operationalized by decreased inpatient hospitalization (e.g., Hansen et al., 2011), emergency room visits, and/or psychotropic medication use (e.g., Hilt et al., 2015, Taussig et al., 2019).”
From A Qualitative Investigation of Foster Youth Mental Health Outcomes: Measuring What Matters (2025) · cites this paper as Taussig et al., 2019
The Methods (Measures; page unavailable) assess mental health service and psychotropic medication use as intervention outcomes. The Results (Outcome Analyses; page unavailable) report less mental health treatment among intervention youth, but no difference in psychotropic medication use; this paper therefore does not support a decrease in medication use. The cited passages do not report emergency room visits. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredTwo quantitative studies found that mentored young people in foster care manifested improved social skills, mental health, quality of life, and greater trust in others than did foster care boys and girls in control groups, but mentees in foster care had shorter matches than mentees not in foster care.
“Although two quantitative studies have found that mentored young people in foster care manifested improved social skills, mental health, quality of life, social skills, and greater trust in others than did foster care boys and girls in control groups [147,148,149] found that mentees in foster care had shorter matches than mentees not in foster care.”
From Unpacking Community-Based Youth Mentoring Relationships: An Integrative Review (2021) · cites this paper as [149]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThree evaluations of two interventions assessed quality of life with child-reported measures at short and long-term follow-up.
“Three evaluations of two interventions assessed quality of life with child-reported measures at short and long-term follow-up (Crespo et al., 2020; Taussig & Culhane, 2010; Taussig et al., 2019).”
From Effectiveness of Mental Health and Wellbeing Interventions for Children and Young People in Foster, Kinship, and Residential Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Taussig et al., 2019
One common outcome in mental health intervention research with foster youth focuses on reductions in psychopathology and diagnostic symptoms.
“One common outcome in mental health intervention research with foster youth focuses on reductions in psychopathology and diagnostic symptoms (e.g., Burns et al., 1999; Taussig et al., 2019; Weiner et al., 2009; Kessler et al., 2008).”
From A Qualitative Investigation of Foster Youth Mental Health Outcomes: Measuring What Matters (2025) · cites this paper as Taussig et al., 2019
Fostering Healthy Futures evaluations showed evidence of fewer dissociative symptoms at 6-month follow-up (d = −0.29, 95% CI [−0.50, −0.09] in the 2010 evaluation).
“with evidence of fewer dissociative symptoms at 6-month follow up in a 2010 (d = −0.29, 95% CI [−0.50, −0.09]) and a linked 2019 evaluation of Fostering Healthy Futures (Taussig & Culhane, 2010; Taussig et al., 2019)”
From Effectiveness of Mental Health and Wellbeing Interventions for Children and Young People in Foster, Kinship, and Residential Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Taussig et al., 2019
No significant differences were observed in long-term quality of life measures in a later extension of the Fostering Healthy Futures study.
“there were no significant differences observed in long-term quality of life measures in a later extension of the same study (Taussig et al., 2019).”
From Effectiveness of Mental Health and Wellbeing Interventions for Children and Young People in Foster, Kinship, and Residential Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Taussig et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 46
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Kaufman AS, & Kaufman NL (2004). Kaufman brief intelligence test second edition manual. Circle Pines, MN: AGS Publishing.
- Taussig HN, & Weiler LM (2017, 9 1). Mentoring for youth in foster care. A National Mentoring Resource Center Population Review Retrieved from http://www.nationalmentoringresourcecenter.org/images/PDF/Mentoring_for_Youth_in_Foster_Care_Population_Review.pdf.
- Authors
- Taussig, H. N., Weiler, L. M., Garrido, E. F., Rhodes, T., Boat, A., & Fadell, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Denver (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Colorado Department of Education (US)
- The Improve Group St Paul MN USA
- Children's Hospital Colorado (US)
- Corresponding author
- Taussig, Heather N.
- Venue
- American Journal of Community Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-08-30
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 405-417
- ISSN
- 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2770
- PMC
- PMC6917986
- OpenAlex
- W2970144294
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2021-07-08)
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Kempestiftelserna
- Pioneer Fund
- Daniels Fund
- U.S. Public Health Service (T32 MH15442)
- National Institute of Mental Health (1 K01 MH01972, 1 R21 MH067618, 1 R01 MH076919)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
- Keywords
- positive youth development, child abuse, foster care, mentoring, preadolescents, posttraumatic stress symptoms, dissociative symptoms, mental health service utilization, psychotropic drug use, replication
- MeSH terms
- Child, Child Abuse, Child Development, Child Welfare, Colorado, Female, Foster Home Care, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Mental Health Services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review