Cited by 30

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Body fat and facial shape are correlated in female adolescents

Windhager, Sonja, Patocka, Karin, Schaefer, Katrin·2013·American Journal of Human Biology

Abstract

Objectives: Relative body weight is not only an important indicator for health and reproductive condition, but also subject to stereotypes and stigmatization. It can be reliably assessed from adult faces alone, yet the facial correlates, especially in adolescents, remain largely unidentified. This study was designed to determine the facial features of adolescent girls that change with body fat proportion using a modern, comprehensive technique for shape analysis. Methods: Standardized frontal facial photographs of 22 Caucasian female adolescents (mean age 15.8 ± 2.7 years) were taken, and body height, body weight, and body fat proportion measured. Seventy‐two somatometric measurement points were digitized on each photograph and their Cartesian coordinates regressed onto body fat proportion. Geometric morphometrics also enabled visualizing the statistical results as shapes. Results: Body fat proportion explained 8.7% of the facial shape variation (10,000 permutations, P = 0.047). Girls with high body fat had a relatively rounder and larger lower face, relatively smaller eyes, and a shorter and wider nose, fuller lips and downturned corners of the mouth. Low body fat was associated with a more angular lower face and a pointier chin, relatively larger eyes and a longer nose. The lips were wider and thinner, the corners of the mouth upturned. Conclusion: Body fat proportion is a substantial factor in facial shape variation of female adolescents. The potential influence of the corresponding facial features on social perception is discussed. Prospects for future research including novel possibilities for stimuli design (GM morphs) are highlighted. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 25:847–850, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajhb.22444

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1068/p6560 · DOI
  2. 10.1068/p6423 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ferrario VF, 2004, Soft tissue facial morphology in obese adolescents: a three‐dimensional noninvasive assessment, Angle Orthod, 74, 37
  4. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802735 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1155/2012/834578 · DOI
  6. 10.1056/NEJM199812243392619 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803232 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s11692-009-9055-x · DOI
  9. 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.557 · DOI
  10. 10.1556/JEP.9.2011.22.1 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2012.02117.x · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.05.004 · DOI
  13. 10.1017/CBO9781107340961 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1002/ajhb.21219 · DOI
  15. 10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1300 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Windhager, S., Patocka, K., & Schaefer, K.
Affiliations
  • Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research Altenberg Austria
  • Department of Anthropology University of Vienna Austria
Venue
American Journal of Human Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-09-19
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
847-850
ISSN
  • 1042-0533
  • 1520-6300
Cited by
30
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review