Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Forensic Facial Reconstruction

Wilkinson, Caroline·2004

Abstract

Forensic facial reconstruction is the reproduction of an individual's face from skeletal remains. Used when other forms of identification are very difficult or impossible, it can give a name to the dead in forensic cases, or in archaeological contexts, provide a tangible impression of real individuals from our past. This comprehensive work starts with a discussion of the importance of the face in society and the history of facial reconstruction, going on to evaluate the accuracy of modern reconstruction methods. The Manchester method of facial reconstruction, and the relationships between the hard and soft tissues of the face are described in detail. Uniquely, it also describes the methods and problems associated with reconstructing the faces of children. Collating all published facial tissue data and describing tissue variations with reference to age, sex, stature and ethnic origin, this book will be an important reference volume for all practitioners in the field.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781107340961

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • African faces tend to have thicker facial tissue than any other group, and Japanese faces have thinner tissues than most other groups except for the side of the head.

    “For instance, African faces tend to have thicker facial tissue than any other group, and Japanese faces have thinner tissues than most other groups except for the side of the head (Wilkinson, 2004).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 290

  1. 10.3408/jasti.1.11 · DOI
  2. Sekharan, 1924, Sexing of skulls via suture pattern types, Journal of the Forensic Science Society India, 2, 19
  3. Lomas, 1993, A canon of deformity; Les demoiselles d'avignon and physical anthropology, Art History, 10
  4. Eisenfeld, 1975, Soft—hard tissue correlations and computer drawings for the frontal view, Angle Orthodontics, 45, 267
  5. Miles, 1954, Malformations of the teeth, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 47, 817, 10.1177/003591575404701001 · DOI
  6. Mew, 1992, Use of the ‘indicator line’ to assess maxillary position, Cranio-view, 2
  7. Sekharan, 1987, Individual characteristics of ectocranial sutures, Indian Journal of Forensic Science, 1, 75
  8. Briggs, C. A. and Martakis, M. Craniofacial anatomy. In J. G. Clement and D. L. Ranson (eds.), Craniofacial Identification in Forensic Medicine. London: Arnold Publications, 1998, 37–48
  9. Suzuki, 1973, Reconstitution of a skull, International Criminal Police Review, 264, 76
  10. Snow, C. C. Victim identification through facial restoration. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, San Diego
  11. Gruner, O. Identification of skulls — a historical review and practical applications. In M. Y. Iscan and R. P. Helmer, Forensic Analysis of the Skull. New York: Wiley Liss Inc., 1993, pp. 29–45
  12. Lanitis, 1994, An automatic face identification system using flexible appearance models, Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, 1, 329
  13. Sekharan, 1987, Permanency of skull suture patterns; evaluation by animal experiments, Indian Journal of Forensic Science, 1, 117
  14. 10.1080/14640749108400966 · DOI
  15. 10.1520/JFS13130J · DOI
  16. Charney, M., Snow, C. C. and Rhine, J. S. The 3 faces of Cindy M. Proceedings of the 30th Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Science, St Louis, MS (1978)
  17. 10.1016/0379-0738(85)90156-2 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/03014467700002301 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01795.x · DOI
  20. Allison, H. C. Personal Identification. Boston, MA: Holbrook Press, 1973
  21. Brown, 1983, Developments in craniofacial superimposition for identification, Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology, 1, 57
  22. Bruce, V., Cowey, A., Ellis, A. W. and Perrett, D. I. Processing the Facial Image. Oxford: Oxford Science Publications. 1992 · DOI
  23. Baba, 1992, Early Jomom female skull from Enshoji, Urawa City, Japan, Bulletin of the National Science Museum, Tokyo, 18
  24. Phillips, 1996, Identification of a suicide victim by facial reconstruction, Journal of Forensic Odonto-stomatology, 14, 34
  25. 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70114-1 · DOI
  26. Angel, 1971, Book Review: Gerasimov's The Face Finder, Science, 173, 712, 10.1126/science.173.3998.712.a · DOI
  27. 10.1002/ajpa.1330580309 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/s004170050370 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/ajpa.1330900206 · DOI
  30. Peck, 1970, A concept of facial aesthetics, Angle Orthodontist, 40, 284
  31. Kilian, J. and Vlček, E. (1989). Age determination from teeth in adult individuals. In M. Y. Iscan (ed.), Age Markers in the Human Skeleton. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, pp. 255–75
  32. Houghton, 1978, Polynesian mandibles, Journal of Anatomy, 127, 251
  33. 10.1097/00002341-199206000-00006 · DOI
  34. Wilkinson, 2002, Juvenile forensic facial reconstruction — a detailed accuracy study, Proceedings of the 10th Meeting of the International Association of Craniofacial Identification, 98
  35. Tyrell, 1997, Forensic three-dimensional facial reconstruction: historical review and contemporary developments, Journal of Forensic Science, 42, 653, 10.1520/JFS14176J · DOI
  36. Pedersen, 1949, The East Greenland Eskimo Dentition. Kobenhavn, 1940, Bianco Lunos, Banstrijkken and Meddelsen on Gronland, 60, 142
  37. Preeyanont, 1995, The standard angle between the longitudinal axis of the ear and the bridge of the nose in Thai women, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 78, 127
  38. 10.1093/biomet/28.1-2.84 · DOI
  39. 10.1006/jasc.1997.0215 · DOI
  40. 10.1159/000147238 · DOI
  41. Y'Edynak, G. J. and Iscan, M. Y. (1993). Craniofacial evolution and growth. In M. Y. Iscan and R. P. Helmer (eds.), Forensic Analysis of the Skull. New York: Wiley Liss Inc., pp. 11–29
  42. 10.1520/JFS15201J · DOI
  43. 10.1016/0379-0738(96)02010-5 · DOI
  44. Ubelaker, D. H. (1978). Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis and Interpretation. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institute Press
  45. Howells, W. W. (1970). Multivariate analysis for the identification of race from the crania. In T. D. Stewart (ed.), Personal Identification in Mass Disasters. Philadelphia, PA: American Museum of Natural History
  46. 10.1093/ejo/9.1.247 · DOI
  47. 10.1080/00224545.1964.9922213 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90170-2 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/scientificamerican0280-132 · DOI
  50. Kemp, R., Towel, N. and Pike, G. (1997). Recognising own and other race faces from video surveillance footage. Paper at 7th European Conference of Psychology and Law, Stockholm
  51. 10.14219/jada.archive.1950.0132 · DOI
  52. Gerasimov, M. M. (1975). The Reconstruction of the Face from the Basic Structure of the Skull, trans. W. Tshernezky, Russia: Publishers unknown
  53. 10.1520/JFS11592J · DOI
  54. Goldhamer, 1926, Aus dem Rontgenlaboratorium der I. anatomischen Lehrkanzel, Anatome Entwiche Desch, 81
  55. Fiorato, V., Boylston, A. and Knusel, C. (2000). Blood Red Roses: The Archaeology of a Mass Grave from the Battle of Towton, AD 1461. Oxford: Oxbow Books
  56. 10.1007/s002660010029 · DOI
  57. Evison, 1999, Computerised 3-D facial reconstruction: research update, Assemblage, 4
  58. 10.1068/p080431 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/S0007-1226(97)90502-6 · DOI
  60. Shepherd, J. (1981). Social factors in face recognition. In G. Davies, H. Ellis and J. Shepherd (eds.), Perceiving and Remembering Faces. London: Academic Press
  61. 10.1002/ajpa.1330330207 · DOI
  62. Sanchez, 1980, Rhinoplasty on the mestizo nose, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 77, 239
  63. Liversidge H. M., Herdeg B. and Rosing F. W. (1998). Dental age estimates in non-adults. In K. W. Alt, F. W. Rosing and M. Teschler-Nicola (eds.), Dental Anthropology, Fundamentals, Limits and Prospects. Vienna: Springer, pp. 419–42
  64. 10.1016/S1355-0306(01)71902-8 · DOI
  65. Tandler, 1909, Über den Schädel Haydns, Mitteilungen der Anthropologie Gesellschaft Wien, 39, 260
  66. Hogarth, W. (1753). The Analysis of Beauty. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  67. 10.1520/JFS14993J · DOI
  68. Parsons, 1905, The relation of cranial sutures to age, Journal of the Royal Anthropology Institute, 25, 30
  69. 10.1016/S0379-0738(99)00026-2 · DOI
  70. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00503.x · DOI
  71. Jankowsky, 1930, Über Unterkiefermasse und ihren rassendiagnostischen Wert, Zeitschrift für morphologie und anthropogie, 28, 347
  72. 10.1006/jhev.1998.0232 · DOI
  73. 10.1002/ajpa.1330300104 · DOI
  74. 10.1597/1545-1569(2000)037<0048:ATDQAO>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  75. Sahni, 2002, Preliminary study on facial soft tissue thickness by magnetic resonance imaging in Northwest Indians, Forensic Science Communications, 4, 1
  76. 10.1520/JFS11926J · DOI
  77. Jenkinson, 1997, Face facts: a history of physiognomy from ancient Mesopotamia to the end of the nineteenth century, Journal of Biomedical Communication, 24, 2
  78. Anand, 1999, Profile of overweight children, Insight, 13
  79. Helmer, 1989, Plastische Gesichtsrekonstruktion als Möglichkeit der Identifizierung unbekannter Schädel (II), Archives Kriminology, 184, 142
  80. 10.3109/17453057909155563 · DOI
  81. 10.1080/00224545.1966.9919661 · DOI
  82. Genecov, 1990, Development of the nose and soft tissue profile, Angle Orthodontist, 60, 191
  83. Whittaker, D. K. (2000). Aging from the dentition. In M. Cox and S. Mays (eds.), Human Osteology in Archaeology and Forensic Science. GMM Publishers, pp. 83–100
  84. Bruce, 1986, The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition, Acta Psychologica, 61, 259, 10.1016/0001-6918(86)90085-5 · DOI
  85. Mays, S. (1996). The human skeletal remains. In J. R. Timby (ed.), The Anglosaxon Cemetery at Empingham II, Rutland. Monograph 70, Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 21–33
  86. 10.1002/ajpa.1330910102 · DOI
  87. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1985.tb01972.x · DOI
  88. George, R. M. (1993). Anatomical and artistic guidelines for forensic facial reconstruction. In Forensic Analysis of the Skull, Wiley-Liss Inc., pp. 215–27
  89. Meredith, 1973, Gingival emergence of human deciduous teeth; a synoptic report, Journal of Tropical Pediatrics and Environmental Child Health, 195
  90. Lysell, 1962, Time and order of eruption of primary teeth: a longitudinal study, Odontologisk Revy, 13, 217
  91. 10.1097/00006534-199309001-00005 · DOI
  92. 10.1079/BJN19660073 · DOI
  93. Weining, W. (1958). Rontgenologische Untersuchungen zur Bestimmung der Weichteildickenmaße des Gesichts. Dissertation Frankfurt
  94. 10.1136/adc.27.131.10 · DOI
  95. Glaister, J. and Brash, J. C. (1937). Medico-legal Aspects of the Ruxton Case. Edinburgh: Elsevier Ltd.
  96. 10.1002/ajpa.1330130308 · DOI
  97. Bullen, 1965, Ultrasonic reflections used for measuring subcutaneous fat in humans, Human Biology, 37, 377
  98. Zuhrt, 1955, Stomatologische Untersuchungen an spätmittelälterlichen Funden von Reckkahn. I. Die Zahnkaries und ihre Folgen, Deutsche Zahn-, Munds-, und Kieferheilkunds, 25, 1
  99. Clifford, B. R. and Bull, R. (1978). The Psychology of Person Identification. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
  100. Brothwell, D. R. (1989). The relationship of tooth wear to aging. In M. Y. Iscan (ed.), Age Markers in the Human Skeleton. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas
  101. Jantz, 1992, Variation among North American Indians: analysis of Boas's anthropometric data, Human Biology, 64, 435
  102. Van Rensburg, M. S. J. (1993). Accuracy of recognition of 3-D plastic reconstruction of faces from skulls. Abstract. Proceedings of the Anatomical Society of South Africa. 23rd Annual Congress 20
  103. 10.1016/B978-0-08-009823-4.50015-X · DOI
  104. Bishara, 2000, Facial and dental changes in adolescents and their clinical implications, The Angle Orthodontist, 70, 471
  105. Angel, 1977, Personality reconstruction from unidentified remains, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 12
  106. 10.1093/biomet/20B.1.1 · DOI
  107. Davies, A., Ellis, H. and Shepherd, J. (1981). Perceiving and Remembering Faces. London: Academic Press
  108. Stadtmuller, 1923, Plastische Physiognomie-Rekonstruktionen auf den beiden diluvialen Schädeln von Obercassel bei Bonn, Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie, 23, 301
  109. Bruce, V. and Young, A. (1998). In the Eye of the Beholder. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  110. Hillson, S. (1996). Dental Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press · DOI
  111. Angel, J. L. (1978). Restoration of head and face for identification. Proceedings of Meetings of American Academy of Forensic Science, St Louis, MO
  112. Brothwell, D. R. (1981). Digging up Bones. British Museum: Cornell University Press
  113. 10.1002/ajpa.1330060306 · DOI
  114. Snow C. E. (1974). Early Hawaiians. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press
  115. 10.1016/S0161-6420(86)33618-2 · DOI
  116. 10.1207/S15327078IN0102_8 · DOI
  117. 10.1002/ajpa.1330070320 · DOI
  118. 10.1520/JFS15149J · DOI
  119. Behrents, R. (1985). An Atlas of Growth in the Aging Craniofacial Skeleton. Craniofacial Growth Series, Ann Arbor: Needham Press
  120. 10.1037/0012-1649.27.1.79 · DOI
  121. Eggeling, 1909, Anatomische Untersuchungen an den Kopfen von vier Hereros, einem Herero-und einem Hottentottenkind. L. Schultze, Forschungsreise im westlichen und zentralen Südafrika, ausgeführt 1903–1905, Denkschriften der Medizinisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft zu Jena, 15, 323
  122. 10.1093/ortho/27.1.31 · DOI · Paper page
  123. Birkner, 1903, Beiträge zur Rassenanatomie der Gesichtsweichteile, Deutsche Gesellschaft Anthropologie, Ethnologie und Urgeschichte, 34, 163
  124. Auslebrook, 1996, Facial soft tissue thicknesses in the adult male Zulu, Forensic Science International, 79, 83, 10.1016/0379-0738(96)01893-2 · DOI
  125. 10.1097/00006534-195707000-00001 · DOI
  126. McGregor, 1926, Restoring Neanderthal man, National History, 26, 288
  127. 10.1002/ar.1091940206 · DOI
  128. 10.1525/aa.1912.14.3.02a00010 · DOI
  129. 10.1002/ajpa.1330860210 · DOI
  130. Wilder, H. H. and Wentworth, B. (1918). Personal Identification. Boston, MA: Richard Badger, Gormon Press
  131. Darwin, C. (1872). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. London: John Murray · DOI
  132. Rhine, S. (1983). Tissue thickness for South-western Indians. Ph.D. thesis. Physical Anthropology Laboratories. Maxwell Museum, University of New Mexico
  133. Cobb, 1955, The age incidence of suture closure, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 13, 394
  134. Whittingham, 1962, Measurement of tissue thickness by ultrasound, Aerospace Medicine, 33, 1121
  135. Caldwell, M. C. (1981). The Relationship of the Details of the Human Face to the Skull and Its Application. M. A. thesis. Arizona State University
  136. 10.2307/1139795 · DOI
  137. 10.1068/p220131 · DOI
  138. Rhine, J. S., Moore, C. E. and Westin, J. T. (eds.) (1982). Facial Reproduction: Tables of Facial Tissue Thickness of American Caucasoids in Forensic Anthropology. Maxwell Museum, Technical Series, no. 1, University of New Mexico
  139. Cole, S. (1965). Races of Man. London: British Museum Press
  140. Fedosyutkin, B. A. and Nainys, J. V. (1993). The relationship of skull morphology to facial features. In Iscan, M. Y. and Helmer, R. P. (eds.), Forensic Analysis of the Skull. New York: Wiley-Liss Inc., pp. 199–213
  141. ViÐarsdóttir, 2001, Geometric morphometrics and the analysis of variations in facial form: robusticity of biological findings in relation to bilateral versus unilateral and missing landmarks, Statistica, 2, 315
  142. Cooper, J. M. and Hutchinson, D. S. (1997). Plato: The Complete Works. Cambridge, IN: Hackett Publishing Company
  143. 10.14219/jada.archive.1936.0277 · DOI
  144. Giles, 1962, Race identification from cranial measurements, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 7, 147
  145. Evison, M. P. (2002). Torticollis in an unidentified female from Leeds, England. Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the International Association of Craniofacial Identification, Bari, Italy
  146. Farkas, L. G. (1981). Anthropometry of the Head and Face in Medicine. New York: Elsevier
  147. Cole, S. A. (2001). Suspect Identities: a History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification. London: Harvard University Press · DOI
  148. 10.1093/ejo/13.3.202 · DOI
  149. Neave, 1994, Book review — Forensic analysis of the skull, International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 4, 163
  150. 10.1148/126.2.479 · DOI
  151. Bertillon, A. (1896). The Bertillon System of Identification. In R. W. McClaughry (ed.). Chicago, IL: The Werner Company
  152. Iscan, M. Y. and Helmer, R. P. (1993). Forensic Analysis of the Skull. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss Inc.
  153. White, T. D. and Folkens, P. A. (1991). Human Osteology. San Diego: Academic Press Inc.
  154. Neave, R. A. H. (1998). Age changes in the face in adulthood. In J. G. Clement and D. L. Ranson (eds.), Craniofacial Identification in Forensic Medicine, Sydney: Arnold Publications, pp. 215–231
  155. 10.1016/0379-0738(89)90200-4 · DOI
  156. Altemus, 1963, Comparative integumental relationships, Angle Orthodontics, 33, 217
  157. Wei, 1983, The relationship between the construction of maxillary first molar and age, Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2, 79
  158. Bruce, 1999, Verification of face identities from images captured on video, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5, 339
  159. 10.1016/0003-9969(78)90052-3 · DOI
  160. 10.1037/h0048765 · DOI
  161. 10.1097/00006534-198503000-00005 · DOI
  162. Kahle, W., Leonhardt, H. and Platzer, W. (1992). Colour Atlas/Text of Human Anatomy, Vol. 1: Locomotor System. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers
  163. Brues, A. M. (1990). The once and future diagnosis of race. In G. W. Gill, and S. Rhine (eds.), Skeletal Attribution of Race: Methods for Forensic Anthropology. Maxwell Museum of Anthropology: University of New Mexico, pp. 66–87
  164. 10.1068/p200755 · DOI
  165. Wen, 1934, The development of the upper eyelid of the Chinese with special reference to the mongolic fold, Chinese Medical Journal, 48, 1216
  166. Czekanowski, 1907, Untersuchungen über das Verhaltnis der Kopfmaße zu dem Schädel-maßen, Archiv für Anthropologie, 34, 42
  167. Birkner, 1905, Beiträge zur Rassenanatomie der Chinesen, Archiv für Anthropologie, IV, 1
  168. Lebedinskaya, G. U., Balueva, T. S. and Veselovskaya, E. B. (1993). Development of methodological principles for reconstruction of the face on the basis of skull material. In M. Y. Iscan and R. P. Helmer (eds.), Forensic Analysis of the Skull. New York: Wiley-Liss Inc., pp. 183–98
  169. 10.2307/1578048 · DOI
  170. Dibbets, 2001, Comparison of linear cephalometric dimensions in Americans of European descent (Ann Arbor, Cleveland, Philadelphia) and Americans of African descent (Nashville), Angle Orthodontist, 72, 324
  171. Stenstrom, 1946, Untersuchungen über die Variation und Kovariation der optischen Elemente des menschlichen Auges, Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavia Supplementum, 26, 1
  172. Heglar, R. and Parks, C. R. (1980). Juvenile facial restoration. Pediatric and cephalometric expectations. Proceedings of the American Association of Forensic Science, Annual meeting, New Orleans
  173. Hwang, 2001, Ethnic differences in soft tissue profiles of Korean and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces, Angle Orthodontist, 72, 72
  174. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x · DOI
  175. 10.3109/00016357009033130 · DOI
  176. Milgrim, 1996, Anthropometrical analysis of the female Latino nose: revised aesthetic concepts and their surgical implications, Archives of Otolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, 122, 109
  177. 10.1097/00006534-198308000-00001 · DOI
  178. 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90255-2 · DOI
  179. Michael, S. D. and Chen, M. (1996). The 3-D reconstruction of facial features using volume distortion. Proceedings of 14th Annual Conference of Eurographics UK, 297–305
  180. 10.1002/ajpa.1330480111 · DOI
  181. 10.1520/JFS13223J · DOI
  182. 10.1016/S0379-0738(98)00066-8 · DOI
  183. Pearson, 1926, The skull and portraits of George Buchanan, Forensic Science International, 83, 51
  184. Yarmey, A. D. (1975). Social-emotional factors in recall and recognition of faces. Proceedings of Annual Conference of Mid-Western Psychological Association, Chicago
  185. 10.1097/00000433-198412000-00009 · DOI
  186. 10.3758/BF03197669 · DOI
  187. Enlow, D. H. (1982). Handbook of Facial Growth, 2nd edn. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders
  188. Aufderheide, A. C. and Rodriguez-Martin, C. (1998). The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of Human Paleopathology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  189. 10.1068/p220153 · DOI
  190. 10.1016/S0301-0503(85)80034-5 · DOI
  191. 10.1097/00000637-199903000-00009 · DOI
  192. Lauprecht, 1957, Messungen der Speckdicke lebender Schweine nach dem Scholotverfahren, Mittel Deutsche Landwirtschaftliche-Gesellschaft, 72, 881
  193. Boyd, W. C. (1950). Genetics and the Races of Man. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications
  194. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(200001)111:1<105::AID-AJPA7>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
  195. Bell, C. (1844). The Anatomy and Philosophy of Expression, 3rd edn. London: George Bell Publishers · DOI
  196. 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70049-8 · DOI
  197. Eggeling, 1913, Die Leistungsfähigkeit physiognomischer Rekonstruktionsversuche auf Grundlage des Schädels, Archiv für Anthropologie, 12, 44
  198. Blair, 1937, Personal and public reaction to the marred face, Blue Book of International and Spanish-Speaking Association of Physicians, Dentists and Pharmacists, 8, 14
  199. Bahrick, 1975, Fifty years of memory for names and faces: a cross-sectional approach, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 377
  200. Evenhouse, 1992, Computer-aided forensic facial reconstruction, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 19, 22

200 of 290 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wilkinson, C.
Published
2004-05-13
Cited by
211
References
3

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review