The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A prospective study of computer users: II. Postural risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders
Abstract
Background: Despite widespread recommendations regarding posture during computer use, associations between specific postures and musculoskeletal health are not well characterized. Methods: Six hundred and thirty‐two newly hired computer users were followed prospectively to evaluate associations between posture and neck or shoulder (N/S) and hand or arm (H/A) musculoskeletal symptoms and musculoskeletal disorders. Participants' postures were measured at entry and they reported symptoms on weekly diaries. Participants reporting symptoms were examined for specific disorders. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to estimate associations between postural variables and risk of symptoms and disorders, controlling for confounding variables. Results: Keying with an inner elbow angle > 121°, greater downward head tilt, and presence of armrests on the participants chair were associated with lower risk of N/S symptoms or N/S disorders. Keying with elbow height below the height of the “J” key and the presence of a telephone shoulder rest were associated with a greater risk of N/S symptoms or N/S disorders. Horizontal location of the “J” key > 12 cm from the edge of the desk was associated with a lower risk of H/A symptoms and H/A disorders. Use of a keyboard with the “J” key > 3.5 cm above the table surface, key activation force > 48 g, and radial wrist deviation of > 5° while using a mouse was associated with a greater risk of H/A symptoms or H/A disorders. The number of hours keying/week was associated with H/A symptoms and disorders. Conclusions: The results suggest that the risk of musculoskeletal symptoms and musculoskeletal disorders may be reduced by encouraging specific seated postures. Am. J. Ind. Med. 41:236–249, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
da Costa, B. R., & Vieira, E. R. (2010) · American Journal of Industrial Medicine · doi:10.1002/ajim.20750 · Cited by 1,618
Gerr, F., Marcus, M., Ensor, C., Kleinbaum, D., Cohen, S., Edwards, A., Gentry, E., Ortiz, D. J., & Monteilh, C. (2002) · American Journal of Industrial Medicine · doi:10.1002/ajim.10066 · Cited by 559
Self-citationSesto, M. E., Irwin, C. B., Chen, K. B., Chourasia, A. O., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2012) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720811433831 · Cited by 73
Irwin, C. B., & Sesto, M. E. (2012) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2012.03.003 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Marcus, M., Gerr, F., Monteilh, C., Ortiz, D. J., Gentry, E., Cohen, S., Edwards, A., Ensor, C., & Kleinbaum, D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Industrial Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03-15
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 236-249
- ISSN
- 0271-3586 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0274
- OpenAlex
- W2161477557
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A prospective study of computer users: II. Postural risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajim.10067
- The paper
- Marcus, M., Gerr, F., Monteilh, C., Ortiz, D. J., Gentry, E., Cohen, S., Edwards, A., Ensor, C., & Kleinbaum, D. (2002). A prospective study of computer users: II. Postural risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.10067
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.