Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,618

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk factors for work‐related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of recent longitudinal studies

da Costa, Bruno R., Vieira, Edgar Ramos·2010·American Journal of Industrial Medicine

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review was designed and conducted in an effort to evaluate the evidence currently available for the many suggested risk factors for work‐related musculoskeletal disorders. Methods: To identify pertinent literature we searched four electronic databases (Cinahl, Embase, Medline, and The Cochrane Library). The search strategies combined terms for musculoskeletal disorders, work, and risk factors. Only case–control or cohort studies were included. Results: A total of 1,761 non‐duplicated articles were identified and screened, and 63 studies were reviewed and integrated in this article. The risk factors identified for the development of work‐related musculoskeletal disorders were divided and organized according to the affected body part, type of risk factor (biomechanical, psychosocial, or individual) and level of evidence (strong, reasonable, or insufficient evidence). Conclusions: Risk factors with at least reasonable evidence of a causal relationship for the development of work‐related musculoskeletal disorders include: heavy physical work, smoking, high body mass index, high psychosocial work demands, and the presence of co‐morbidities. The most commonly reported biomechanical risk factors with at least reasonable evidence for causing WMSD include excessive repetition, awkward postures, and heavy lifting. Additional high methodological quality studies are needed to further understand and provide stronger evidence of the causal relationship between risk factors and work‐related musculoskeletal disorders. The information provided in this article may be useful to healthcare providers, researchers, and ergonomists interested on risk identification and design of interventions to reduce the rates of work‐related musculoskeletal disorders. Am. J. Ind. Med. 53:285–323, 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajim.20750

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 1,618

Metadata

Authors
da Costa, B. R., & Vieira, E. R.
Venue
American Journal of Industrial Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09-14
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
285-323
ISSN
  • 0271-3586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0274
OpenAlex
W2162951521
Cited by
1,618
References
4
FWCI
7.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk factors for work‐related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of recent longitudinal studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajim.20750
The paper
da Costa, B. R., & Vieira, E. R. (2010). Risk factors for work‐related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of recent longitudinal studies. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20750

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.