Cited by 143Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesWorkplace Health and Well-beingPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale as a screening instrument of major depressive disorder among Japanese workers

Wada, Koji, Tanaka, Katsutoshi, Theriault, Gilles, Satoh, Toshihiko, Mimura, Masaru, Miyaoka, Hitoshi, Aizawa, Yoshiharu·2007·American Journal of Industrial Medicine

Abstract

Background: The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES‐D) is used at workplaces to screen depressive disorders. The aim of this study was to examine the validity of the CES‐D for depression in a workplace. Methods: The CES‐D was administered to 2,219 workers (84.2% men; age 21–68 years) at a manufacturing company in Japan. Concomitantly all workers had an interview with the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) as a gold standard for diagnosing major depressive disorder (MDD). The validity was evaluated by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The area under the ROC curve of the CES‐D was 0.96 [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.94–0.99]. The optimal cut‐off score of MDD was 19 for screening. Conclusions: The validity of CES‐D is confirmed and it is a valid instrument for detecting MDD in working populations in Japan. Am. J. Ind. Med. 50:8–12, 2007. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajim.20403

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wada, K., Tanaka, K., Theriault, G., Satoh, T., Mimura, M., Miyaoka, H., & Aizawa, Y.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Kitasato University (JP)
  • SHOWA Medical University (JP)
Corresponding author
Wada, Koji
Venue
American Journal of Industrial Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-12-11
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
8-12
ISSN
  • 0271-3586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0274
OpenAlex
W2100188512
Cited by
143
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Industrial Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
CES-D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, major depressive disorder, depression screening, workplace mental health, Japanese workers, industrial workers, screening instrument validity, cut-off values, MINI interview
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Occupational Diseases, Psychological Tests, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review