Cited by 38Fungal Infections and StudiesOccupational Health and PerformanceActinomycetales infections and treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coccidioidomycosis outbreak among inmate wildland firefighters: California, 2017

Open access

Abstract

Background: In California, state prison inmates are employed to fight wildfires, which involves performing soil‐disrupting work. Wildfires have become more common, including areas where Coccidioides, the soil‐dwelling fungus that causes coccidioidomycosis, proliferates. However, work practices that place wildland firefighters at risk for coccidioidomycosis have not been investigated. Methods: On August 17, 2017, the California Department of Public Health was notified of a cluster of coccidioidomycosis cases among Wildfire A inmate wildland firefighters. We collected data through medical record abstraction from suspected case‐patients and mailed a survey assessing potential job task risk factors to Wildfire A inmate firefighters. We described respondent characteristics and conducted a retrospective case–control investigation to assess coccidioidomycosis risk factors. Results: Among 198 inmate firefighters who worked on Wildfire A, 112 (57%) completed the survey. Of 10 case‐patients (four clinical and six laboratory‐confirmed), two were hospitalized. In the case–control analysis of 71 inmate firefighters, frequently cutting fire lines with a McLeod tool (odds ratio [OR]: 5.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1–37.2) and being in a dust cloud or storm (OR: 4.3; 95% CI: 1.1–17.4) were associated with illness. Two of 112 inmate firefighters reported receiving coccidioidomycosis training; none reported wearing respiratory protection on this wildfire. Conclusions: Wildland firefighters who use hand tools and work in dusty conditions where Coccidioides proliferates are at risk for coccidioidomycosis. Agencies that employ them should provide training about coccidioidomycosis and risk reduction, limit dust exposure, and implement respiratory protection programs that specify where respirator use is feasible and appropriate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajim.23218

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Arthroconidia of soil-dwelling coccidioides represent a non-human-emitted, infectious fungal aerosol that is primarily transmitted naturally via wind and wildfires, and during active soil disturbance.

    “The arthroconidia (Table 1) of soil-dwelling coccidioides represent a non-human-emitted, infectious fungal aerosol that is primarily transmitted naturally via wind and wildfires, and during active soil disturbance [40,41,42].”

    From Comparative Mask Protection against Inhaling Wildfire Smoke, Allergenic Bioaerosols, and Infectious Particles (2022) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Introduction identifies Coccidioides as a soil-dwelling fungus that causes infection through spore inhalation. The Discussion links exposure to windborne dust and soil-disturbing firefighting tasks, but does not identify the spores as arthroconidia or establish that wildfires themselves are a primary natural transmission route. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Laws, R. L., Jain, S., Cooksey, G. S., Mohle‐Boetani, J., McNary, J., Wilken, J., Harrison, R., Leistikow, B., Vugia, D. J., Windham, G. C., & Materna, B. L.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • California Department of Public Health (US)
  • California Correctional Health Care Services Elk Grove California USA
Corresponding author
Laws, Rebecca L.
Venue
American Journal of Industrial Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-01-23
Volume
64
Issue
4
Pages
266-273
ISSN
  • 0271-3586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0274
OpenAlex
W3125116123
Cited by
38
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Industrial Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (R25 OH008802, R13 OH009753, U60-OH-008468)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Actinomycetales infections and treatment
Keywords
coccidioidomycosis, Coccidioides, wildfire suppression, occupational exposure, dust exposure, respiratory protection, outbreak investigation, risk factors
MeSH terms
Wildfires, Adult, California, Coccidioides, Coccidioidomycosis, Disease Outbreaks, Humans, Male, Occupational Diseases, Prisoners, Case-Control Studies, Occupational Exposure, Firefighters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review