The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Precision and error of three‐dimensional phenotypic measures acquired from 3dMD photogrammetric images
Open accessAbstract
The genetic basis for complex phenotypes is currently of great interest for both clinical investigators and basic scientists. In order to acquire a thorough understanding of the translation from genotype to phenotype, highly precise measures of phenotypic variation are required. New technologies, such as 3D photogrammetry are being implemented in phenotypic studies due to their ability to collect data rapidly and non‐invasively. Before these systems can be broadly implemented, the error associated with data collected from images acquired using these technologies must be assessed. This study investigates the precision, error, and repeatability associated with anthropometric landmark coordinate data collected from 3D digital photogrammetric images acquired with the 3dMDface System. Precision, error due to the imaging system, error due to digitization of the images, and repeatability are assessed in a sample of children and adults (n = 15). Results show that data collected from images with the 3dMDface System are highly repeatable and precise. The average error associated with the placement of landmarks is sub‐millimeter; both the error due to digitization and due to the imaging system are very low. The few measures showing a higher degree of error include those crossing the labial fissure, which are influenced by even subtle movement of the mandible. These results suggest that 3D anthropometric data collected using the 3dMDface System are highly reliable and, therefore, useful for evaluation of clinical dysmorphology and surgery, analyses of genotype‐phenotype correlations, and inheritance of complex phenotypes. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Introduction to Quantitative Genetics.
Edwards, A. W. F., & Falconer, D. S. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529912 · Cited by 21,447
Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits
(2002) · Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics · doi:10.1046/j.1439-0388.2002.00356.x · Cited by 6,092
Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium
Risch, N. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35015718 · Cited by 1,839
Introduction to Quantitative Genetics.
Edwards, J. H., & Falconer, D. S. (1960) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2342481 · Cited by 1,784
(1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-9083-2 · Cited by 852
Experimental strategies for the genetic dissection of complex traits in animal models
Darvasi, A. (1998) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0198-19 · Cited by 540
The promise of geometric morphometrics
Richtsmeier, J. T., Burke Deleon, V., & Lele, S. R. (2002) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.10174 · Cited by 358
Self-citationFinding the molecular basis of quatitative traits: successes and pitfalls
Flint, J., & Mott, R. (2001) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35076585 · Cited by 309
Anthropometry of the Head and Face
Schendel, S. A. (1995) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-199508000-00036 · Cited by 277
Weinberg, S. M., Scott, N. M., Neiswanger, K., Brandon, C. A., & Marazita, M. L. (2004) · The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal · doi:10.1597/03-066.1 · Cited by 267
Cited by
Genetic analysis of non‐syndromic craniosynostosis
Boyadjiev, S., & for the International Craniosynostosis Consortium (2007) · Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research · doi:10.1111/j.1601-6343.2007.00393.x · Cited by 135
Self-citationMorphological integration of the skull in craniofacial anomalies
Richtsmeier, J., & DeLeon, V. (2009) · Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research · doi:10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01448.x · Cited by 47
Self-citation3D Analysis of the Cranial and Facial Shape in Craniosynostosis Patients: A Systematic Review
Kurniawan, M. S. I. C., Tio, P. A. E., Abdel Alim, T., Roshchupkin, G., Dirven, C. M. F., Pleumeekers, M. M., Mathijssen, I. M. J., & van Veelen, M.-L. C. (2024) · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery · doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000010071 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Aldridge, K., Boyadjiev, S. A., Capone, G. T., DeLeon, V. B., & Richtsmeier, J. T.
- Venue
- American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-09-20
- Volume
- 138A
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 247-253
- ISSN
- 1552-4825 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4833
- OpenAlex
- W2150115611
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 6.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Precision and error of three‐dimensional phenotypic measures acquired from 3dMD photogrammetric images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajmg.a.30959
- The paper
- Aldridge, K., Boyadjiev, S. A., Capone, G. T., DeLeon, V. B., & Richtsmeier, J. T. (2005). Precision and error of three‐dimensional phenotypic measures acquired from 3dMD photogrammetric images. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.30959
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.