Cited by 30dental development and anomaliesHair Growth and DisordersGenetic and rare skin diseases.

Future developments in XLHED treatment approaches

Huttner, Kenneth·2014·American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A

Abstract

X‐linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (XLHED) is the most common genetic disorder of ectoderm development, presenting with abnormalities of skin, teeth, hair, and secretory glands. In the first years of life, XLHED‐affected patients are at risk for life‐threatening hyperthermia and pulmonary infection. Survival into childhood and beyond is associated with severe dental abnormalities as well as chronic growth, respiratory, skin, eye, and psychosocial disorders. Currently there are no approved therapies to restore function in disorders of development like XLHED. Over the last two decades, molecular research has provided convincing evidence that alterations in the ectodysplasin (EDA) gene that disrupt the encoded protein EDA‐A1 are causative for XLHED. In mouse and dog XLHED models, administration of a single course of an EDA‐A1 replacement protein (EDI200) resulted in permanent correction of the key phenotypic features, providing the first hope for an effective, targeted therapy. Animal models for genetic disorders have their strengths and limitations that must be considered when modeling clinical studies in human patients. Of greatest significance in the case of a developmental disorder may be the relative timeline for normal development and the maturation level at birth. With FDA clearance to start EDI200 studies in XLHED patients, we are on the verge of converting a decade of animal studies into the first test of a novel paradigm for rescue and permanent correction of a human developmental disorder. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajmg.a.36499

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Postnatal administration of Fc-EDA did not show any improvement as expected.

    “however, postnatal administration did not show any improvement as expected.[20]”

    From Ectodermal Dysplasia – An Overview and Update (2024) · cites this paper as [20]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huttner, K.
Affiliations
Edimer Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Huttner, Kenneth
Venue
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-03-26
Volume
164
Issue
10
Pages
2433-2436
ISSN
  • 1552-4825 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4833
OpenAlex
W2142169438
Cited by
30
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › dental development and anomalies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and rare skin diseases.
Keywords
X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia, gene therapy, developmental disorders, hyperthermia, dental anomalies, pulmonary infection
MeSH terms
Animals, Ectodermal Dysplasia, Humans, Phenotype, Ectodysplasins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review