Cited by 27Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesSexual Differentiation and DisordersPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Age at and indication for diagnosis of Turner syndrome in the pediatric population

Swauger, Sarah, Backeljauw, Philippe, Hornung, Lindsey, Shafer, Jessica, Casnellie, Lori, Gutmark‐Little, Iris·2021·American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A

Abstract

Early diagnosis of Turner syndrome (TS) enables timely intervention and may improve outcomes, but many are still diagnosed late. The objectives of our study were to describe the age and clinical features leading to diagnosis of TS in a large referral center. We hypothesize that newer testing modalities, such as noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), may lead to a decline in the age of diagnosis. Medical records of TS patients followed at The Cincinnati Center for Pediatric and Adult TS Care between 1997 and 2016 were reviewed for age at diagnosis, karyotype, and clinical indication(s). Patients (<18 years) were included (n = 239). Thirty-seven percent of patients were diagnosed prenatally or neonatally (≤1 month). The median age of diagnosis was 1.5 (IQR 0.0-10.0) years. If not made during those periods, the median age was 9.3 (IQR 3.2-12.5) years. The most common indications for diagnosis were before birth, unspecified prenatal testing (57%); in neonates/infants, lymphedema (21%); in childhood, short stature (72%); and in adolescence, short stature (45%) followed by pubertal delay with short stature (22%). The age of TS diagnosis in our cohort is young. However, when the diagnosis is not made before 1 year, the median age of diagnosis has not changed in recent years. The age at diagnosis could decrease with prenatal testing, although our study may not have assessed a long enough period of increased use of NIPT. Together with an increase in provider clinical awareness, this may result in more age-appropriate screening of comorbidities and earlier therapeutic intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajmg.a.62459

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swauger, S., Backeljauw, P., Hornung, L., Shafer, J., Casnellie, L., & Gutmark‐Little, I.
Affiliations
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Swauger, Sarah
Venue
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-08-13
Volume
185
Issue
11
Pages
3411-3417
ISSN
  • 1552-4825 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4833
OpenAlex
W3190077720
Cited by
27
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Keywords
Turner syndrome, age at diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, non-invasive prenatal testing, prenatal diagnosis, neonatal diagnosis, short stature, lymphedema, delayed puberty, pediatric patients, karyotype
MeSH terms
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing, Adolescent, Age Factors, Child, Child, Preschool, Dwarfism, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Karyotyping, Pediatrics, Turner Syndrome, Early Diagnosis, Karyotype

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review