Cited by 6Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchClinical practice guidelines implementationAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare

Adherence to adult clinical practice guidelines for Down syndrome.

Wood, Jordan C., Gochyyev, Perman, Santoro, Stephanie L.·2025·American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A

Abstract

Adults with Down syndrome (DS) have unique health care needs with evidence-based care guidelines to address these. Yet, the 2020 adult guidelines were unstudied; we aimed to assess adherence to these guidelines. We reviewed clinical and demographic data from medical charts of 327 adults with DS who were seen in the MGH DSP. We calculated adherence to care guidelines and analyzed correlations between both demographic traits and clinical results. Mean adherence rate to each of the nine adult guidelines was 67.3%. Adherence rates that were below our mean adherence rate included colonoscopy (42.9%), iron (41.9%), audiology specialist (35.8%), and audiogram (35.2%). We found four significant correlations: assigned females at birth had a significantly higher body mass index (BMI) than assigned males at birth (p < 0.001), Hispanic patients had a significantly higher BMI than other patients (p = 0.015), Hispanic patients had a significantly higher rate of diabetes than other patients (p = 0.036), and Black patients had a significantly lower rate of hypothyroidism than other patients (p = 0.004). We assessed the adherence rates to adult DS guidelines and highlighted disparities in healthcare for patients with DS to inform clinicians on how to improve care for patients with DS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajmg.a.63850

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prevalence of hypothyroidism is increased among patients with Down syndrome (31%-65%).

    “Prevalence of hypothyroidism is increased among patients with Down syndrome (31%-65%) andTurnersyndrome(12.7%). 16-18”

    From Hypothyroidism: A Review (2025) · cites this paper as [17]

  • Prevalence of hypothyroidism is increased among patients with Turner syndrome (12.7%).

    “Prevalence of hypothyroidism is increased among patients with Down syndrome (31%-65%) andTurnersyndrome(12.7%). 16-18”

    From Hypothyroidism: A Review (2025) · cites this paper as [17]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wood, J. C., Gochyyev, P., & Santoro, S. L.
Affiliations
  • MGH Institute of Health Professions (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Santoro, Stephanie L.
Venue
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-08-29
Volume
197
Issue
1
Pages
e63850-e63850
ISSN
  • 1552-4825 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4833
OpenAlex
W4402012757
Cited by
6
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Keywords
Down syndrome, guideline adherence, health care disparities, colonoscopy, iron supplementation, audiogram, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, sex differences, Hispanic patients, racial disparities
MeSH terms
Adult, Down Syndrome, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Body Mass Index, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Guideline Adherence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review