Cited by 83Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPersonality Traits and PsychologyGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Genetic and environmental contributions to stability in loneliness throughout childhood

Open access
Bartels, Meike, Cacioppo, John T., Hudziak, James J., Boomsma, Dorret I.·2008·American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics

Abstract

Heritability estimates based on two small cross‐sectional studies in children indicate that the genetic contribution to individual differences in loneliness is approximately 50%. A recent study estimated the genetic contribution to variation in loneliness in adults to be 48%. The current study aims to replicate and expand these findings by conducting longitudinal analyses in order to study causes of individual differences in stability of loneliness throughout childhood. Univariate and multivariate longitudinal analyses are conducted in a large sample of young Dutch twins. Information on loneliness comes from maternal ratings on the Child Behavior Checklist. Using an average score of loneliness over ages 7, 10, and 12, results from the two previous studies are replicated and a heritability estimate of 45% is found. The remaining variance is accounted for by shared environmental influences (12%), and nonshared environmental influences (43%). The longitudinal analyses, however, show that heritability is 58% at age 7, 56% at age 10, but drops to 26% at age 12. A parallel increase in influences of shared family environment is observed, explaining 6% of the variance at age 7, 8% at age 10 and 35% at age 12. The remaining variance is explained by relatively stable influences of nonshared environmental factors. Stability in loneliness is high, with phenotypic correlations in the range of 0.51–0.69. This phenotypic stability is mainly caused by genetic and nonshared environmental influences. The results indicate the importance of both innate as well as nonshared environmental factors for individual differences in loneliness. Further, different results between causes of individual differences for the average score of loneliness and results for age 12 from the longitudinal analyses, indicate the importance of longitudinal analyses with data at well‐defined ages. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajmg.b.30608

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individual differences in perceived social isolation are about 50% heritable.

    “These studies indicate that the heritability of individual differences in perceived isolation is approximately 50%.”

    From Social isolation (2011) · cites this paper as [58]

  • The relative contribution of heritability to loneliness is likely to decrease during early adolescence.

    “However, adolescent loneliness is reportedly associated with negative social relationships at school and home [14], and the relative contribution of heritability to loneliness is likely to decrease during early adolescence [15, 16].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 83

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Van der Valk JC, van den Oord EJCG, Verhulst FC, Boomsma DI. 2003. Using commonanduniqueparentalviewstostudytheetiologyof7-yearold twins' internalizing and externalizing problems. Behav Genet 33(4): 409-420.

Authors
Bartels, M., Cacioppo, J. T., Hudziak, J. J., & Boomsma, D. I.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Bartels, Meike
Venue
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-10-04
Volume
147B
Issue
3
Pages
385-391
ISSN
  • 1552-4841 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-485X
OpenAlex
W2113319562
Cited by
83
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO/ SPI 56-464-14192, 56‐464‐14192, 451–04-034, Spi-56-464-14192)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH58799‐03, R01MH058799)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
loneliness, heritability, genetic factors, nonshared environment, shared environment, phenotypic stability, childhood, individual differences, twins, longitudinal development, Child Behavior Checklist
MeSH terms
Child, Environment, Genetics, Medical, Humans, Loneliness, Longitudinal Studies, Phenotype

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review