Pharmacological treatment of disruptive behavior in Smith–Magenis syndrome
Open accessAbstract
Smith–Magenis syndrome (SMS) is a complex genetic syndrome caused by an interstitial deletion of chromosome 17p11.2. Children and adults with SMS appear to have unique neurobehavioral problems that include: sleep disturbance, self‐injurious and maladaptive behaviors, stereotypies, and sensory integration disorders. We gathered retrospective psychotropic use information from parents or other caregivers of 62 individuals with SMS who were asked about use of psychotropic medication from a list of commonly used psychiatric medications. For those drugs identified, respondents were asked to rate the experience with the particular medication using a likert‐type scale. Drugs were grouped into seven main categories: (1) stimulants; (2) antidepressants; (3) antipsychotics; (4) sleep aides; (5) mood stabilizers; (6) alpha 2 agonists; and (7) benzodiazepines. Relative frequencies, means and standard deviations pertaining to age and medication effect were derived for each medication category. Six of the seven medication categories examined showed no meaningful deviations from the “no change” score. The benzodiazepine group showed a mild detrimental effect. There were no gender differences in efficacy. Use of psychotropic medication started early in life (mean age 5 years), particularly with sleep aides. Although no medication category was identified as efficacious in SMS, all the categories reported herein may be considered as an option for brief symptomatic relief. Published 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other monogenic syndromes like Kleefstra, KBG, WitKoS, Angelman, Coffin-Sirris, Rubinstein-Taybi, Phelan-McDermid, Smith-Magenis Syndrome and Kabuki syndrome also have a clear prefrontal component in their behavioral and cognitive phenotype.
“Other monogenic syndromes like Kleefstra, KBG, WitKoS, Angelman, Coffin-Sirris, Rubinstein-Taybi, Phelan-McDermid, Smith–Magenis Syndrome and Kabuki syndrome also have a clear prefrontal component in their behavioral and cognitive phenotype [272–280].”
From Development of prefrontal cortex (2022) · cites this paper as [278]
The Introduction describes Smith–Magenis syndrome as a genetic syndrome with intellectual disability and distinctive neurobehavioral problems; the Discussion also mentions inattention and impulsivity. But neither passage identifies a prefrontal component of its behavioral or cognitive phenotype. This source supports the Smith–Magenis phenotype portion of the multi-syndrome sentence, not its prefrontal characterization. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 31
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Duncan W Gropman A Morse R Krasnewich D Smith ACM Good Babies Sleeping Poorly: Insufficient Sleep in Infants with Smith-Magenis Syndrome (SMS) Am J Hum Genet (suppl) 2003 73 5 A896
- Smith AC Dykens E Greenberg F Sleep disturbance in Smith-Magenis syndrome (del 17 p11.2) Am J Med Genet 1998b 81 2 186 91 9613860
- Authors
- Laje, G., Bernert, R., Morse, R., Pao, M., & Smith, A. C. M.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Florida State University (US)
- George Mason University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Laje, Gonzalo
- Venue
- American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10-27
- Volume
- 154C
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 463-468
- ISSN
- 1552-4868 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4876
- PMC
- PMC3022344
- OpenAlex
- W2171192059
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 1.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C Seminars in Medical Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (Z99 MH999999)
- National Institute of Mental Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Keywords
- Smith-Magenis syndrome, disruptive behavior, psychotropic drugs, pharmacotherapy, chromosome 17p11.2 deletion, sleep disorders, self-harm, stimulants, antidepressants, antipsychotic drugs, sleep aids, benzodiazepines, alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, mood stabilizers, drug efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Analysis of Variance, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Psychotropic Drugs, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Smith-Magenis Syndrome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review