Cited by 20Mental Health and Patient InvolvementGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesEthics in Clinical Research

Research priorities of people living with Turner syndrome

Open access
Sandberg, David E., Singer, Dianne, Bugajski, Benjamin, Gebremariam, Achamyeleh, Scerbak, Teresa, Dooley Maley, Kathleen L., Scurlock, Cindy, Culin, Denise +2 more·2019·American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C Seminars in Medical Genetics

Abstract

Despite major discoveries, traditional biomedical research has not always addressed topics perceived as priorities by patients and their families. Patient-centered care is predicated on research taking such priorities into account. The present study surveyed women with Turner syndrome (TS; 18+ years; n = 543), parents of women with TS (n = 232), and parents of younger daughters with TS (<18 years; n = 563), regarding their priorities for research. The study also included a quantitative audit of research categorized as either predominantly biomedical or psychological in the medical and other scientific literature. The overwhelming majority of all surveyed stakeholders (84% and higher) rated both biomedical and psychological research in TS as "very important," yet only approximately 9% of published research focused on psychological aspects of TS. The odds of women with TS identifying psychological research as "most important" was significantly lower (OR: 0.607; 95% CI: 0.375, 0.982] than the odds of parents making the same prioritization. Despite the majority of participants rating research as very important, only approximately half-rated participation in research as similarly important. The majority of respondents in all three groups (59%-73%) indicated they would "very likely" participate in research pertaining to eating or nutrition, quality of life, or genetic studies in TS. Substantially fewer expressed similar eagerness to participate in studies involving the study of a new medicine or medical device. Increased engagement of patient and family stakeholders in research requires that investigators select topics of study important to that community.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajmg.c.31676

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite the willingness of women and parents of individuals with TS to participate in research related to eating and/or nutrition, there is a paucity of research in this area.

    “Despite the willingness of women and parents of individuals with TS to participate in research related to eating and/or nutrition,710 there is a paucity of research in this area.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sandberg, D. E., Singer, D., Bugajski, B., Gebremariam, A., Scerbak, T., Dooley Maley, K. L., Scurlock, C., Culin, D., Eder, S., & Silberbach, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Turner Syndrome Society of the United States Houston Texas
  • Turner Syndrome Global Alliance (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Corresponding author
Sandberg, David E.
Venue
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C Seminars in Medical Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-02-15
Volume
181
Issue
1
Pages
13-21
ISSN
  • 1552-4868 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4876
OpenAlex
W2913991931
Cited by
20
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C Seminars in Medical Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD093450, R13 HD096857)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
Turner syndrome, research priorities, patient-oriented research, psychology research, biomedical research, research participation, quality of life, genetic research
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Patient Participation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research, Turner Syndrome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review