Cited by 109Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

Effects of positive reinforcement training techniques on the psychological welfare of zoo‐housed chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes )

Pomerantz, Ori, Terkel, Joseph·2009·American Journal of Primatology

Abstract

Captive environments encompass various factors that can elevate stress levels and jeopardize the wellbeing of the captive animals. The use of positive reinforcement training (PRT) techniques enables researchers and caretakers to reduce tension directly associated with potentially stressful procedures and states. The current study tested the general effect of PRT on the wellbeing of zoo-housed chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) by measuring behaviors that reflect poor and good welfare and that were not directly connected to the specific aim of the training session. The behavior of a group of twelve chimpanzees was measured throughout the day from the exhibition yard, at baseline (12 weeks) and during the PRT period (10 weeks). The results show a significant decrease in abnormal and stress-related behaviors and a significant rise in prosocial affiliative behaviors following implementation of the training program. The training was shown to have a greater positive effect on low-ranking individuals compared with high-ranking ones. This research shows for the first time that PRT offers an enrichment effect whose general influence lasts throughout the day, irrespective of any direct link to a specific trained behavior. Consequently, it can be claimed that PRT presents an effective enrichment tool that can be implemented with captive animals. Because of the above-noted differential effect between high- and low-ranking chimpanzees, however, this should be taken into consideration when comb…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajp.20703

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Affiliative interactions in social species may be associated with physiological and affective states associated with good welfare.

    “Likewise, an increase in affiliative interactions could signal that the birds’ welfare is being improved by offering encounters, as affiliative interactions in social species may be associated with physiological and affective states associated with good welfare, e.g., [22,23,24].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pomerantz, O., & Terkel, J.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Pomerantz, Ori
Venue
American Journal of Primatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-05-11
Volume
71
Issue
8
Pages
687-695
ISSN
  • 0275-2565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2345
OpenAlex
W2006657340
Cited by
109
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Primatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
positive reinforcement training, chimpanzees, zoo animal welfare, abnormal behavior, stress behavior, affiliative behavior, social rank, enrichment, captive primates
MeSH terms
Aggression, Animals, Animals, Zoo, Behavior, Animal, Pan troglodytes, Female, Health Promotion, Male, Reinforcement, Psychology, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review