Cited by 86Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesForensic and Genetic ResearchPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

Nonmetric cranial trait variation and prehistoric biocultural change in the Azapa Valley, Chile

Sutter, Richard C., Mertz, Lisa·2004·American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract

Historically, interpretations of both biological and cultural change within the prehistoric Azapa Valley, northern Chile, have cited large-scale population movements, with replacement from complex societies located in the adjacent highlands to the east. Biological estimates of this change have traditionally relied upon biodistance estimates, using craniofacial measures of both deformed and nondeformed skulls. In order to evaluate whether large-scale prehistoric migrations occurred in the Azapa Valley, we examine biodistance results from nonmetric cranial traits for eight mortuary samples that represent all time periods of prehistoric occupation of the valley. None of the mean measures of divergences (MMD) among mortuary samples examined by this study were significant. These results suggest biological continuity in the Azapa Valley during 5,000 years of prehistory, with nonsignificant gene flow during the late Middle Horizon (AD 750-1100) and Late Intermediate (AD 1100-1476) periods. Biodistance results also suggest endogamy within coastal and inland populations. The broader implications of these results are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajpa.10311

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sutter and Mertz (2004) successfully employ modified and unmodified crania in their argument for biological continuity in northern Chile's Azapa Valley.

    “Sutter and Mertz (2004) successfully employ modified and unmodified crania in their argument for biological continuity in northern Chile's Azapa Valley.”

    From Cranial modification and the shapes of heads across the Andes (2020) · cites this paper as Sutter and Mertz (2004)

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 56 · Cited by 86

Authors
Sutter, R. C., & Mertz, L.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Fort Wayne (US)
  • Kansas City Health Department (US)
Corresponding author
Sutter, Richard C.
Venue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-06-10
Volume
123
Issue
2
Pages
130-145
ISSN
  • 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-8644
OpenAlex
W2162632532
Cited by
86
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
FWCI
36.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physical Anthropology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Opus: Research & Creativity (Indiana University – Purdue University Fort Wayne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Keywords
biodistance, prehistoric migration, biological continuity, gene flow, endogamy, Azapa Valley, Late Intermediate Period, Middle Horizon
MeSH terms
Anthropology, Cultural, Anthropology, Physical, Cephalometry, Chile, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review