Cited by 31Paleopathology and ancient diseasesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

Cranial modification and the shapes of heads across the Andes

Open access
Torres-Rouff, Christina·2020·International Journal of Paleopathology

Abstract

This broad literature review considers advances in the study of cranial vault modification with an emphasis on investigations of Andean skeletal remains over the last two decades. I delimit three broad categories of research, building on Verano's synthesis of the state of Andean paleopathology in 1997. These are associations with skeletal pathological conditions, classification and morphology, and social identity. Progress is noted in each of these areas with a particular emphasis on methodological advances in studying morphology as well as the growth of contextualized bioarchaeology and the incorporation of social theory in the consideration of cranial modification as a cultural practice. The article concludes with avenues for future research on head shaping in the Andes specifically and paleopathology more broadly.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpp.2019.06.007

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

3 of 37 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Okumura (2014) found that patterns of cranial modification had no significant relationship to a suite of osteological markers: cribra orbitalia, cranial trauma, antemortem tooth loss, dental caries, and periodontal cavities.

    “Okumura (2014) found that patterns of cranial modification had no significant relationship to a suite of osteological markers (in this case, cribra orbitalia, cranial trauma, antemortem tooth loss, dental caries, and periodontal cavities).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Okumura (2014) source

      The Results (page unavailable) report significant differences by cranial-deformation type in the male sample, including caries per tooth. The Conclusions (page unavailable) also report differences in antemortem tooth loss among males. The paper found no significant differences among women, but the claim incorrectly applies that finding to the study as a whole. (LLM, conf=0.91)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Cradleboarding probably alters head shape in ways that differ from intentional binding in degree and possibly in symmetry.

    “these practices likely produce modifications to head shape that differ from those produced through intentional binding in degree and potentially in symmetry”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Clark et al., 2007 source
    • cites Kohn et al., 1995 source
  • Findingreasoning

    Attempts to create a standardized approach have mostly been used as a foundation upon which scholars build, modify, and refocus their data collection.

    “attempts to create a standardized approach (i.e., Buikstra and Ubelaker, 1994) have mostly been used as a foundation upon which scholars build, modify, and refocus their data collection”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Buikstra and Ubelaker, 1994
  • Interpretationreasoning

    Barring complete obliteration of the sutures, inconsistent patterning of suture closure can help determine craniostenosis versus intentional modification.

    “barring complete obliteration of the sutures, the inconsistent patterning of suture closure can help determine the presence of craniostenosis versus the presence of intentional modification”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    Jiménez et al. (2012) found little to no effect of cranial shaping on dental occlusion regardless of type or symmetry of modification in a Peruvian collection.

    “Jiménez et al. (2012) used a Peruvian collection to explore the effects of cranial shaping on dental occlusion finding little to no effect regardless of type or symmetry of the modification.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jiménez et al. (2012) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 57
  • May combine two claims. 15
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Mendonça de Souza et al. (2008) argue that modifying an infant's head in the Chillón Valley, Peru caused death.

    “Mendonça de Souza et al. (2008) argue that the act of modifying the head of an infant from the Chillón Valley in Peru was the cause of death”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mendonça de Souza et al. (2008) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    A substantial number of papers use well-preserved Andean material to focus on morphology without larger considerations of cultural developments specific to these populations.

    “there are a substantial number of papers that simply use typically well-preserved Andean material to focus on questions of morphology without larger considerations of the cultural developments specific to these populations”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    In the last twenty years, only occasional exploration has occurred of health and pathological effects tied to binding.

    “we have continued to see only the occasional exploration of health and pathological effects tied to binding”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Study of the health consequences of head shaping itself is rare, especially in the last twenty years.

    “study of the health consequences of the practice itself are few and far between, especially in the last twenty years”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Cranial modification is frequently documented by bioarchaeologists working in Andean skeletal collections, but these are not consistently reported.

    “Cranial modification is frequently documented by bioarchaeologists working in Andean skeletal collections; however, these are not consistently reported.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingcitation

    The author's work led to a model for an integrative and contextualized view of identity in the Chilean Atacama that goes beyond solely cranial modification to consider the body and the grave in myriad ways.

    “In my work, this ultimately lead to the presentation of a model for an integrative and contextualized view of identity in the Chilean Atacama that goes beyond solely cranial modification to consider the body and the grave in myriad ways (Torres-Rouff and Knudson, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Torres-Rouff and Knudson, 2017 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Contextualized bioarchaeology and social theory have increasingly been incorporated into the study of cranial modification as a cultural practice.

    “the growth of contextualized bioarchaeology and the incorporation of social theory in the consideration of cranial modification as a cultural practice”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Consequently, much research is only comparable at the level of presence/absence or broad categories.

    “Consequently, much research is only comparable at the level of presence/absence or perhaps broad categories.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Works in social identity incorporate contemporary social theory and embodied life into scientific analyses of cranial shaping and Andean prehistory.

    “The works that approach this, incorporate contemporary thinking on social theory and the embodied life into scientific analyses of cranial shaping and Andean prehistory.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Unintentional practices that alter head shape frequently involve only the back of the head and can be readily differentiated from intentional head shaping.

    “these unintentional practices frequently involve only the back of the head and can be readily differentiated from intentional head shaping”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The review reports progress in three areas of research on Andean cranial vault modification: associations with skeletal pathological conditions, classification and morphology, and social identity.

    “Progress is noted in each of these areas with a particular emphasis on methodological advances in studying morphology as well as the growth of contextualized bioarchaeology and the incorporation of social theory in the consideration of cranial modification as a cultural practice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These works have opened the door for significant work exploring the relationship between population groups and the complex migration history of the pre-Columbian Andes.

    “Importantly, they have opened the door for significant work exploring the relationship between population groups and the complex migration history of the pre-Columbian Andes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Andes frequently serve as a laboratory for morphological investigations because of large, well-preserved collections and variation in practices.

    “the Andes frequently serve as a laboratory for these morphological investigations due to its large, well preserved collections and variation in practices”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Pechenkina and Delgado (2012) found that cranial shape correlates with health and status at Villa El Salvador, Peru, likely related to different populations on the formative central coast and not directly to modification.

    “Pechenkina and Delgado (2012) compare cranial shape with health and status in their research at Villa El Salvador, Peru, finding that these patterns correlate and likely are related to the different populations occupying the formative central coast of Peru and are not directly related to modification.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pechenkina and Delgado (2012) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Methodological advances in studying morphology have been a notable area of progress in research on cranial vault modification.

    “Progress is noted in each of these areas with a particular emphasis on methodological advances in studying morphology”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These works have affected methods and research questions in some areas.

    “As such, they have affected methods and research questions in some areas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The growth of digital technologies capable of characterizing morphology has been reflected in a surge of recent work using these techniques.

    “The growth of digital technologies capable of characterizing morphology has also been reflected in a surge of recent work using these techniques.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    There has been notable growth in work that considers cultural context in the study of head shaping.

    “there has been a notable and important growth in work that considers cultural context writ large in the study of head shaping”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Information derived from morphological studies has significant value as scientific work and allows Andean skeletal material to be used in studies of population biology.

    “The information derived from these morphological studies has significant value as scientific work for its own sake, therefore shaping our approaches to studying cranial modification and also allowing for the use of Andean skeletal material in studies of population biology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    There has been an ongoing and significant focus on morphology, integrating new technologies and moving beyond simple classification.

    “we have seen an ongoing and significant focus on morphology, integrating new technologies, and moving beyond simple classification”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Tiesler (1998) noted a significant difference in age at death between modified and unmodified Maya individuals.

    “Tiesler (1998) has also noted a significant difference in age at death between modified and unmodified Maya individuals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tiesler (1998)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Investigations of cranial vault modification have expanded and diversified in the twenty years since Verano's synthesis.

    “these investigations have expanded and diversified in the 20 years since Verano turned his attention to it”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Sutter and Mertz (2004) successfully employ modified and unmodified crania in their argument for biological continuity in northern Chile's Azapa Valley.

    “Sutter and Mertz (2004) successfully employ modified and unmodified crania in their argument for biological continuity in northern Chile's Azapa Valley.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sutter and Mertz (2004) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This aspect of head shaping is likely reflected in the few cases of death that can be tied to the practice.

    “This aspect of head shaping is likely reflected in the few cases of death that can be tied to this practice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    O'Brien and Stanley (2013) assessed normal variation and used a quantitative approach to analyze whether a skull was modified.

    “This includes O'Brien and Stanley, 2013 interesting work on skulls from throughout the Andes that included assessment of normal variation and a quantitative approach to the analysis of whether a skull was modified.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites O'Brien and Stanley, 2013 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Inconsistent reporting reflects substantive variation between geographic regions and the necessity of different quantifiers and qualifiers depending on research questions.

    “At some level this reflects the substantive variation between geographic regions and the necessity of different quantifiers and qualifiers for modification practices depending on the research questions in play.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Recent years have yielded methodological refinements and approaches that are now foundational to much scholarly work with head shaping practices.

    “In recent years, these papers have yielded methodological refinements and approaches that are now foundational to much scholarly work with head shaping practices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The area of social identity has seen the most significant change in the study of cranial modification over the past twenty years.

    “I would argue that this area has seen the most significant change in the study of cranial modification over the past twenty years.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The strongest contribution of these pieces is their assessment of effects on metric and non-metric traits to provide a methodology for integrating crania in studies of evolutionary relationships and affinity.

    “the strongest contribution of these pieces is in their assessment of the effects on metric and non-metric traits in an effort to provide a methodology for integrating these crania in other studies of evolutionary relationships and affinity”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Verano (1997a) notes that head shaping serves as an important social marker in need of better cultural and temporal definition.

    “In his survey, Verano (1997a) notes that head shaping serves as an important social marker in need of better cultural and temporal definition”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Verano (1997a)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Such works have found between-population variation in metric traits, but less overall effect on the presence of discrete traits.

    “Such works have found between-population variation in metric traits, but less overall effects on the presence of discrete traits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Other spectra of pathological effects may not be observable in skeletal remains.

    “Further, other spectra of pathological effects may not be observable in skeletal remains.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The breadth of styles and the lack of cranial modification practices among some pre-Columbian groups stresses the need to document and classify practices throughout the Andes as much as possible.

    “However, this breadth of styles and the lack of cranial modification practices among some pre-Columbian groups stresses the need to document and classify inasmuch as possible the practices seen throughout the Andes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The second broad category of morphology papers explores the effects of the practice on metric and nonmetric characters of the skull.

    “The second broad category of papers speaking to morphology specifically explores the effects of the practice on the metric and nonmetric characters of the skull.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The study of cranial vault modification remains an active field of inquiry in bioarchaeology.

    “The study of cranial vault modification remains an active field of inquiry in bioarchaeology”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    The ability to establish degrees of standardization is an important advance with significant bearing when applied to broader contextualized studies.

    “This is an important advance and one that may have significant bearing when applied to broader contextualized studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Contextualization of cranial modification as a cultural practice has significantly informed understanding of the lives and societies of pre-Columbian Andean peoples.

    “The contextualization of cranial modification as a cultural practice has significantly informed our understanding of the lives and societies of pre-Columbian Andean peoples.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    Preservation variation hinders study of headdresses, hairstyles, cradleboards and modifying apparatuses.

    “Of course, the study of these, as well as of cradleboards and modifying apparatuses, are impeded by variation in preservation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Embodiment approaches take influence from Bourdieu and gender scholars, promoting engagement with the experience of lived bodies including movement, consumption, and practice.

    “These approaches take influence from Bourdieu and numerous gender scholars, promoting a view that engages with the experience of lived bodies including movement, consumption, and practice”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bourdieu

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Whether crania need to be complete to assess modification is unresolved, and papers seldom detail this.

    “there is no clear consensus as to whether crania must be complete to assess the presence of modification and papers often shy from detailing this”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Cranial modification is intrinsically linked to the interaction between a specific deformation device and the growing infant cranium.

    “he highlights that cranial modification is inherently tied to the”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Verano, 1997a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Barth (1969) argued that ethnicity was a social construction defined through regular interaction with other groups.

    “Barth (1969), who argued that ethnicity was a social construction defined through regular interaction with other groups”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Barth (1969)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Mesoamerican study of cranial modification has been enhanced by focusing on a social conception of the body and integrating records and archaeological analyses that situate the practice in cultural context.

    “where the study of cranial modification has been enhanced by focusing on a social conception of the body and the integration of records and archaeological analyses that situate the practice within its cultural context”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Duncan, 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Tiesler, 1998

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Tiesler, 2014 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Velasco incorporates approaches regarding biological heterogeneity in the Colca Valley and explores the role of head shaping in ethnogenesis and social differentiation.

    “Velasco incorporates some of these more established approaches regarding biological heterogeneity in the Colca Valley (2018a), but also successfully explores the role of head shaping in ethnogenesis and social differentiation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Velasco, 2018a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Kurin (2014) correlates head shape with changing group boundaries, warfare, and mobility.

    “Kurin (2014) also tackles this topic by correlating head shape with changing group boundaries, and interestingly, with warfare and mobility, as well.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kurin (2014) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Most published work on intentional head shaping in the Andes is locally focused, and no major Andean synthesis exists comparable to those produced for the Maya.

    “most published research focused on the practice of intentional head shaping in the Andes tends to be locally focused, and at this point, we have no major syntheses of the practice in the Andes or among widespread Andean groups along the lines of what has been developed for the Maya (e.g., Tiesler, 1998Tiesler, , 2014)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Tiesler, 1998

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Tiesler, 2014 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Sofaer (2006) posits that understanding the individual body in its specific context can yield information on how bodies were used to express social lives.

    “Sofaer (2006) posits that an understanding of the individual body in its specific context can yield information on how bodies were used to express social lives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sofaer (2006)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Head shape functions as a locus of local social identities or practices and varies markedly across the Andes.

    “as head shape serves as a locus of local social identities or local social practices and clearly has significant variation across the region.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Blom demonstrates that the contrast between homogenous patterning of head shape in Tiwanaku colonies and tremendous diversity in the core likely reflects the power of the core to draw people from disparate parts of the Andes.

    “she demonstrates that the contrast between homogenous patterning of head shape in the Tiwanaku colonies and the tremendous diversity in the core likely reflect the power of the core to draw people from disparate parts of the Andes”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Blom

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The recent edited volume uniting considerations of social aspects of the head in the Andes and Mesoamerica is testament to a burgeoning intersection and research field focused on the head as a nexus of social practice.

    “The recent publication of an edited volume that unites considerations of social aspects of the head, including and beyond head shaping, in both the Andes and Mesoamerica (Tiesler and Lozada, 2018a) is testament to this burgeoning intersection and research field focused on the head as a nexus of social practice”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tiesler and Lozada, 2018a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Together these theoretical perspectives can provide a complex view of interactions between body and society and frame understanding of head shaping practices as specific and in conversation with culture, identity, and child-rearing.

    “Together these theoretical perspectives can provide a complex view on the interactions of the body with society and allowed for this to frame our understanding of head shaping practices as specific and in conversation with culture, identity and child-rearing practices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Theoretical considerations of the body as material culture and embodiment have been more salient to recent contextualized investigations into head shaping and its social implications.

    “More salient to the recent contextualized investigations into head shaping and its social implications have been theoretical considerations of the body as material culture (e.g., Sofaer, 2006) and embodiment (e.g., Meskell and Joyce, 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Sofaer, 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Meskell and Joyce, 2003

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Headdresses and hairstyles may have served as highly visible, emblematic markers of identity and social practices, particularly in the Andes.

    “However, they are an important avenue of complementary research, especially in the Andes, as these may well have also served as highly visible and emblematic markers of identity and social practices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This body of Mesoamerican work has developed sophisticated approaches and represents a strong influence and parallel to approaches in the Andes.

    “This body of work has developed a number of sophisticated approaches, and as such, represents a strong influence and parallel to approaches in the Andes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Cradleboarding practices have received little in-depth study in recent decades.

    “While cradleboarding practices have not been considered in depth in recent decades”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Research in the three major areas has grown productively over the past two decades, adding substantially to knowledge of lived experience in Andean prehistory.

    “In sum, there has been productive growth in research in all three of these major areas over the past 20 years, contributing much to our understanding of the lived experience for individuals in Andean prehistory.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Velasco argues that standardization of the practice may have masked varied life experiences.

    “He argues that the standardization of the practice may well have masked varied life experiences (Velasco, 2018b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Velasco, 2018b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mannheim et al. (2018) argue that head shaping across time in Peru was tied to personhood, social differentiation, and crafting a social landscape.

    “The recent work of Mannheim et al. (2018) took a broader look at head shaping across time in Peru, arguing for ties not only to personhood and social differentiation but also as a means of crafting a social landscape.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mannheim et al. (2018)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Research on cranial shaping's role in social identity has yielded more nuanced understandings of the Andean past.

    “Of more relevance to Andean archaeology, however, inquiries into the role of cranial shaping in social identity have provided more nuanced understandings of the past in the Andes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These works contribute to a contextualized bioarchaeological approach by alluding to the daily practice of individuals and caregivers in this region.

    “That said, these works also contribute to a contextualized bioarchaeological approach to our understanding of cranial modification by alluding to the daily practice of individuals and caregivers in this region.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    This research has moved beyond skeletal material to combine bioarchaeological and archaeological findings in holistic accounts of past life and change.

    “This work has gone beyond the skeletal material to integrate findings from across bioarchaeology and archaeology in holistic appraisals of life and change in the past.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Lozada (2011) focuses on the social import of head shaping as a sign of ethnicity reflected in economic activity for Chiribaya groups.

    “Lozada's (2011) work involving Chiribaya skeletal samples where she focuses on the social import of head shaping as a sign of ethnicity, as reflected in economic activity for these groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lozada (2011) source
62 of 62
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cranial vault modification is not a disease process.

    “While cranial vault modification is not a disease process”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most alterations to natural head shape in contexts where cultural practices are seen likely result from intentional interventions on the body.

    “most alterations to natural head shape in contexts where cultural practices are seen likely result from these interventions on the body”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Other spectra of pathological effects may not be observable in skeletal remains.

    “Further, other spectra of pathological effects may not be observable in skeletal remains.”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Okumura's reported finding conflicts with its reference title

    Minor

    The text says Okumura found no significant relationship between modification patterns and health markers, while the cited paper's title says differences in modification types are related to differences in the frequencies of cranial and oral health markers.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 105 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Allison, 1981, La práctica de la deformación craneana entre los pueblos andinos precolombinos, Chungara, 7, 238
  2. Cocilovo, 1975, Estudio de dos factores que influencian la morfologia craneana en una colección andina: el sexo y la deformación artificial, Revista del Instituto de Antropologia, 3, 197
  3. Dembo, 1938, Deformaciones intencionales del cuerpo humano de carácter étnico. Buenos Aires, J. Anesi
  4. Manríquez, 2006, Intentional cranial deformation in archaeological populations of Arica (Chile): preliminary geomorphometrics analysis using craniofacial radiographs, Chungara, 38, 13
  5. Manríquez, 2011, Análisis morfométrico y de ADNmt de restos esqueletales arcaicos del suroeste de Sudamerica, Chungara, 43, 283
  6. Mendonça de Souza, 2008, Deformación craneana como causa de muerte de un niño del Valle de Chillón, Perú, Chungara, 40, 41
  7. O’Brien, 2004, On the classification of abnormal head shape: interpreting artificial cranial deform- ation and craniosynostosis, J. Paleopathol., 16, 27
  8. Sheets, 1977, Facial asymmetry and artificial cranial deformation in a set of American Indian Skulls, Southwestern Lore, 43, 15
  9. Soto-Heim, 1987, Evolución de deformaciones intencionales, tocados y prácticas funerarias en la prehistoria de Arica, Chile, Chungara, 19, 129
  10. Soto-Heim, 2005, Asymmetry of the skull base and cranial deformation, Société de biométrie humaine et Anthropologie, 23, 203
  11. Varela, 1993, Evaluación de la influencia del efecto sexo, edad y deformación artificial en la estimación de distancias biológicas por medio de la D2 de Mahalanobis, Boletin de la Sociedad Española de Antropologia Biologia, 14, 135

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Torres-Rouff, C.
Venue
International Journal of Paleopathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
29
Pages
94-101
ISSN
1879-9817 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963501975
Cited by
31
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Paleopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Paleopathology and ancient diseases
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
cranial modification, social identity, bioarchaeology, social theory
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Cultural Characteristics, Diffusion of Innovation, Disease, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Male, Paleopathology, Research Design, Sex Factors, Skull, Social Identification, South America, History, Ancient

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review