The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The microscopic determination of age in human bone
Abstract
The microscopic age changes that occur in human cortical bone were measured by counting the number of osteones, osteon fragments and non‐Haversian canals, and estimating the percentage of lamellar bone in four selected 100 power fields in the outer third of the cortex in ground sections from the mid‐shaft of the femur, tibia and fibula. Age graphs were derived from 126 specimens covering the age range from birth through 95 years. The best correlation with age by regression analysis was found in the osteon fragment number in the fibula (ρ = 9.74). The use of the regression formula for this factor permits the age to be estimated within ± ten years of the actual age 95% of the time. An alternative method utilizes a specially devised profile chart to estimate age from the age change graphs. When this method was checked on 56 additional specimens, 87.3% of the estimates were within ± five years of the actual age, and all estimates were within ± ten years. It was concluded that there are measurable microscopic age changes in the cortex of the major long bones of the leg that can be used to estimate the age of an individual with known accuracy over the entire range from birth to 95 years. This method can be applied to fragmented and incomplete skeletons as well as eroded archeologic skeletons, since only the mid‐shafts of leg bones are used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The problem of aging human remains and living individuals: A review
Cunha, E., Baccino, E., Martrille, L., Ramsthaler, F., Prieto, J., Schuliar, Y., Lynnerup, N., & Cattaneo, C. (2009) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.09.008 · Cited by 545
Personal identification in mass disasters
Stewart, T. D., Institution, S., & Army, U. S. D. O. T. (1970) · doi:10.5479/sil.30678.39088001440254 · Cited by 482
Mirzaali, M. J., Schwiedrzik, J. J., Thaiwichai, S., Best, J. P., Michler, J., Zysset, P. K., & Wolfram, U. (2016) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2015.11.018 · Cited by 325
Susceptibility of aging human bone to mixed-mode fracture increases bone fragility
George, W. T., & Vashishth, D. (2006) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2005.08.002 · Cited by 40
Age estimation of skeletal remains: principal methods
Lynnerup, N., & Villa, C. (2014) · Research and Reports in Forensic Medical Science · doi:10.2147/rrfms.s35660 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Kerley, E. R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1965-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-163
- ISSN
- 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-8644
- OpenAlex
- W2056675910
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The microscopic determination of age in human bone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajpa.1330230215
- The paper
- Kerley, E. R. (1965). The microscopic determination of age in human bone. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330230215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.