Cited by 250

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bioenergetics and the origin of hominid bipedalism

Rodman, Peter S., McHenry, Henry M.·1980·American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract

Compared to most quadrupedal mammals, humans are energetically inefficient when running at high speeds. This fact can be taken to mean that human bipedalism evolved for reasons other than to reduce relative energy cost during locomotion. Recalculation of the energy expended during human walking at normal speeds shows that (1) human bipedalism is at least as efficient as typical mammalian quadrupedalism and (2) human gait is much more efficient than bipedal or quadrupedal locomotion in the chimpanzee. We conclude that bipedalism bestowed an energetic advantage on the Miocene hominoid ancestors of the Hominidae.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajpa.1330520113

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Upright bipedal walking has long been argued to represent an adaptation for greater walking economy.

    “Upright bipedal walking has long been argued to represent an adaptation for greater walking economy (Rodman & McHenry, 1980), as human bipedal walking is considerably less expensive than quadrupedal or bipedal walking in other primates (Nakatsukasa et al., 2004; Sockol et al., 2007).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1525/aa.1953.55.4.02a00030 · DOI
  2. Bernor R. L., 1978, The mammalian systematics, biostratigraphy and biochronology of Maragheh and its importance for understanding late Miocene hominoid zoogeography and evolution
  3. Campbell B. G., 1966, Human Evolution
  4. 10.1016/0047-2484(76)90085-3 · DOI
  5. Darwin Charles, 1872, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, 10.5962/bhl.title.2112 · DOI
  6. DuBrul E. L. L., 1962, The general phenomenon of bipedalism, Am. ZoologisT, 2, 205, 10.1093/icb/2.2.205 · DOI
  7. Fedak M. A., 1974, Energy cost of bipedal running, Am. J. Physiol., 227, 1033, 10.1152/ajplegacy.1974.227.5.1038 · DOI
  8. Haekel E., 1868, Natürliche Schopfungsgeschichte
  9. 10.1525/aa.1961.63.4.02a00020 · DOI
  10. 10.1126/science.146.3642.416 · DOI
  11. 10.1086/200477 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/scientificamerican0478-90 · DOI
  13. Johanson D. C., 1978, Nouvelles découvertes dhomininides et decouvertes dindustries lithiques pliocenes a Hadar, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris., 287, 1975
  14. 10.1126/science.104384 · DOI
  15. 10.2307/2798801 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/278317a0 · DOI
  17. 10.1525/aa.1962.64.2.02a00050 · DOI
  18. 10.1152/jappl.1963.18.2.367 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1126/science.809842 · DOI
  20. Napier J. R., 1963, Classification and Human Evolution, 178
  21. 10.1038/scientificamerican0467-56 · DOI
  22. Pilbeam D. R., 1970, The Evolution of Man
  23. 10.1126/science.835018 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/978-1-4757-0964-3_5 · DOI
  25. Robinson J. T., 1972, Early Hominid Posture and Locomotion
  26. 10.2307/1440415 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/ajpa.1330340105 · DOI
  28. 10.1126/science.179.4069.186 · DOI
  29. 10.1152/ajplegacy.1970.219.4.1104 · DOI
  30. Tucker V. A., 1975, The energetic cost of moving about, Am. Scientist, 63, 413
  31. 10.1038/scientificamerican0960-62 · DOI
  32. Washburn S. L., 1963, Classification and Human Evolution, 190
  33. Wescott R. W., 1967, The exhibitionistic origin of human bipedalism, Man, 2, 630
  34. 10.1016/B978-0-12-176850-8.50022-6 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/BF00430237 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rodman, P. S., & McHenry, H. M.
Venue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1980-01
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
103-106
ISSN
  • 0002-9483
  • 1096-8644
Cited by
250
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review