The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Variations in enamel thickness and structure in East African hominids
Abstract
Tooth fragments are an appreciable but neglected proportion of fossil hominidspecimens. The present study on 47 naturally fractured enamel surfaces of premolar and molar teeth of Plio‐Pleistocene East African hominids measured enamel thickness, slope of incremental lines (striae of Retzius), and the morphology of Hunter Schreger bands (HSBs). Specimens allocated to three categories—“robust” australopithecines (EAFROB), “early Homo” (EAFHOM), and “unknown”—were photographed in ethanol with polarised light. Enamel thickness was measured on the occlusal (OT), cuspal (CT), and lateral (LT) aspects. The angle of intersection of striae of Retzius (D) with the enamel dentine junction (EDJ) was recorded, together with the degree of curvature and width of Hunter‐Schreger bands (HSB). Absolute measurements of enamel thickness were scaled by using two allometry correction factors. Absolute thicknesses of all enamel measurements were significantly greater in the EAFROB (OT 3.1 mm; CT 3.3 mm; LT 2.4 mm) compared with EAFHOM (OT 1.4 mm; CT 1.6 mm; LT 1.6 mm) categories. Correction for size reduces the mean difference between the two taxa, but CT and OT thickness remain significantly different (P < 0.05). HSBs in EAFROB were relatively straight and narrower (X = 52.8 μm) than in EAFHOM, which are more curved and wider (X = 62.0 μm), suggesting greater enamel prism decussation in early Homo. The slope of striae was less in EAFROB permanent molars (X = 23°) compared with EAFHOM (X = 31°), indicating faster rates of coverage during crown formation in “robust” australopithecines. We conclude that the study of fractured enamel surfaces can contribute to our understanding of the systematic relationships and patterns of enamel growth of early hominids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Growth processes in teeth distinguish modern humans from Homo erectus and earlier hominins
Dean, C., Leakey, M. G., Reid, D., Schrenk, F., Schwartz, G. T., Stringer, C., & Walker, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/414628a · Cited by 517
Diet and the evolution of the earliest human ancestors
Teaford, M. F., & Ungar, P. S. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.260368897 · Cited by 490
Dental enamel as a dietary indicator in mammals
Lucas, P., Constantino, P., Wood, B., & Lawn, B. (2008) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20729 · Cited by 331
Self-citationUngar, P. S., & Sponheimer, M. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1207701 · Cited by 269
Stable isotope-based diet reconstructions of Turkana Basin hominins
Cerling, T. E., Manthi, F. K., Mbua, E. N., Leakey, L. N., Leakey, M. G., Leakey, R. E., Brown, F. H., Grine, F. E., Hart, J. A., Kaleme, P., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1222568110 · Cited by 235
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Beynon, A., & Wood, B.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-06
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-193
- ISSN
- 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-8644
- OpenAlex
- W1971783258
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variations in enamel thickness and structure in East African hominids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajpa.1330700205
- The paper
- Beynon, A., & Wood, B. (1986). Variations in enamel thickness and structure in East African hominids. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330700205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.