Cited by 235Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesIsotope Analysis in Ecology

Stable isotope-based diet reconstructions of Turkana Basin hominins

Open access
Cerling, Thure E., Manthi, Fredrick Kyalo, Mbua, Emma N., Leakey, Louise N., Leakey, Meave G., Leakey, Richard E., Brown, Francis H., Grine, Frederick E. +5 more·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Hominin fossil evidence in the Turkana Basin in Kenya from ca . 4.1 to 1.4 Ma samples two archaic early hominin genera and records some of the early evolutionary history of Paranthropus and Homo . Stable carbon isotopes in fossil tooth enamel are used to estimate the fraction of diet derived from C 3 or C 4 resources in these hominin taxa. The earliest hominin species in the Turkana Basin, Australopithecus anamensis , derived nearly all of its diet from C 3 resources. Subsequently, by ca . 3.3 Ma, the later Kenyanthropus platyops had a very wide dietary range—from virtually a purely C 3 resource-based diet to one dominated by C 4 resources. By ca . 2 Ma, hominins in the Turkana Basin had split into two distinct groups: specimens attributable to the genus Homo provide evidence for a diet with a ca . 65/35 ratio of C 3 - to C 4 -based resources, whereas P. boisei had a higher fraction of C 4 -based diet ( ca . 25/75 ratio). Homo sp. increased the fraction of C 4 -based resources in the diet through ca . 1.5 Ma, whereas P. boisei maintained its high dependency on C 4 -derived resources.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1222568110

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A shift towards a strong C4 dietary signature occurred in Homo with the appearance of early African H. erectus at or before 1.7 Ma, rather than in the earlier species H. habilis and H. rudolfensis, whose modal carbon stable isotope signal is similar to that of Au. afarensis and Au. africanus, suggesting a mixed C3/C4 diet.

    “a shift towards a strong C4 dietary signature occurred in Homo with the appearance of early African H. erectus (≤ 1.7 Ma), rather than in the earlier species H. habilis and H. rudolfensis, whose modal carbon stable isotope signal is similar to that of Au. afarensis and Au.africanus, suggesting a mixed C3/C4 diet 19”

    From The evolutionary history of the human face (2019) · cites this paper as [19]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [14]Cerling TE, Harris JM, Passey BH. Dietary preferences of East African Bovidae based on stable isotope analysis. J Mammal. 2003;84:456–471. [Google Scholar]
  2. [32]Sponheimer M, et al. Diets of southern African bovidae: The stable isotope evidence. J Mammal. 2003;84:471–479. [Google Scholar]
  3. [55]Feibel CS, Harris JM, Brown FH. Paleoenvironmental context for the Late Neogene of the Turkana Basin. In: Harris JM, editor. Koobi Fora Research Project. Vol 3. Oxford: Clarendon; 1991. pp. 321–370. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cerling, T. E., Manthi, F. K., Mbua, E. N., Leakey, L. N., Leakey, M. G., Leakey, R. E., Brown, F. H., Grine, F. E., Hart, J. A., Kaleme, P., Roche, H., Uno, K. T., & Wood, B. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • National Museums of Kenya (KE)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Lukuru Foundation (CD)
  • Frankfurt Zoological Society (DE)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • George Washington University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-06-03
Volume
110
Issue
26
Pages
10501-10506
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2050743603
Cited by
235
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13
FWCI
119.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
Keywords
hominin diet, stable carbon isotopes, dental enamel, Turkana Basin, Australopithecus anamensis, Paranthropus boisei, early Homo, hominin evolution, fossil hominins
MeSH terms
Animals, Carbon Isotopes, Dental Enamel, Diet, Fossils, Humans, Kenya, Hominidae, History, Ancient

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review