Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 437

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A simple carbon isotope model for reconstructing prehistoric human diet

Kellner, Corina M., Schoeninger, Margaret J.·2007·American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract

A compilation of experimental animal data shows that neither δ 13 C collagen nor δ 13 C apatite nor Δ 13 C CO‐AP indicate diagnostic reconstructions of diet, diet energy and diet protein. In contrast, plots of δ 13 C collagen against δ 13 C apatite provide a model of three regression lines (C 3, C 4, and marine diet protein) where position on each line indicates the energy source (C 3, C 4, or mixed). Neither body size nor trophic position appears to affect these relationships. Modern free‐ranging, terrestrial fauna do not fit the model perhaps because they, unlike the experimental fauna, mainly use fermentation rather than digestion during energy metabolism. Archaeological humans fall as expected based on associated floral and faunal evidence. Foraging people plot at positions expected from associated C 3 fauna and plants. Those from Cahokia plot, as expected, from associated deer, nuts, and maize whereas people from nearby smaller sites plot in positions consistent with eating more fish. Agriculturists from Ontario and Grasshopper Pueblo plot consistent with dependence on fish by the former and on turkeys by the latter. In Tierra del Fuego, people from interior regions ate more terrestrial fauna, as suggested by ethnohistoric reports, than did people from the coast. In the Southwestern Cape in South Africa individuals late in the sequence have pure C 3 diets whereas ones early in the sequence ate marine protein as suggested by independent archaeological evidence. People on San Nicolas Island depended on C 4 plants in contrast to other islands off California's coast. This simple model provides more detailed and precise dietary information than do individual isotopic measures. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajpa.20618

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 437

Metadata

Authors
Kellner, C. M., & Schoeninger, M. J.
Venue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-05-25
Volume
133
Issue
4
Pages
1112-1127
ISSN
  • 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-8644
OpenAlex
W1981021431
Cited by
437
References
40
FWCI
9.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A simple carbon isotope model for reconstructing prehistoric human diet. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajpa.20618
The paper
Kellner, C. M., & Schoeninger, M. J. (2007). A simple carbon isotope model for reconstructing prehistoric human diet. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20618

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.