Cited by 64Forensic and Genetic ResearchForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesGenetic diversity and population structure

Indirect evidence for the genetic determination of short stature in African Pygmies

Open access
Becker, Noémie S.A., Verdu, Paul, Froment, Alain, Le Bomin, Sylvie, Pagezy, Hélène, Bahuchet, Serge, Heyer, Evelyne·2011·American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract

Central African Pygmy populations are known to be the shortest human populations worldwide. Many evolutionary hypotheses have been proposed to explain this short stature: adaptation to food limitations, climate, forest density, or high mortality rates. However, such hypotheses are difficult to test given the lack of long‐term surveys and demographic data. Whether the short stature observed nowadays in African Pygmy populations as compared to their Non‐Pygmy neighbors is determined by genetic factors remains widely unknown. Here, we study a uniquely large new anthropometrical dataset comprising more than 1,000 individuals from 10 Central African Pygmy and neighboring Non‐Pygmy populations, categorized as such based on cultural criteria rather than height. We show that climate, or forest density may not play a major role in the difference in adult stature between existing Pygmies and Non‐Pygmies, without ruling out the hypothesis that such factors played an important evolutionary role in the past. Furthermore, we analyzed the relationship between stature and neutral genetic variation in a subset of 213 individuals and found that the Pygmy individuals' stature was significantly positively correlated with levels of genetic similarity with the Non‐Pygmy gene‐pool for both men and women. Overall, we show that a Pygmy individual exhibiting a high level of genetic admixture with the neighboring Non‐Pygmies is likely to be taller. These results show for the first time that the major morphological difference in stature found between Central African Pygmy and Non‐Pygmy populations is likely determined by genetic factors. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajpa.21512

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genomic admixture analysis has proven useful for investigating the causes of group differences in a variety of traits.

    “Genomic admixture analysis has already proven to be a useful technique for investigating the causes of group differences in a variety of traits.”

    From Global Ancestry and Cognitive Ability (2019) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Conclusions (page not specified) report that genetic admixture estimates correlated with stature among African Pygmy individuals, supporting the technique’s usefulness for investigating one group difference. Our copy does not establish its usefulness for a variety of traits. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Among Central African Pygmies, non-Pygmy admixture was associated with greater height.

    “For example, Becker et al. (2011) [32] found that among Central African Pygmies, non-Pygmy admixture was associated with greater height.”

    From Global Ancestry and Cognitive Ability (2019) · cites this paper as [32]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Bahuchet S. 1992b. Spatial mobility and access to the resources among the African Pygmies. In: Rao Ca, editor. Mobility and territoriality: social and spatial boundaries among foragers, fishers, pastoralists and peripatetics. N.Y./Oxford: Berg. p 205-257.
  2. Bahuchet S, Guillaume H. 1982. Aka-farmer relations in the northwest Congo basin. In: Leacock E, Lee RB, editors. Poli- tics and history in band societies. Cambridge/Paris: Cam- bridge University Press /M.S.H. p 189-211.
  3. Cavalli-Sforza LL, editor. 1986. African Pygmies. London: Aca- demic Press.
  4. Froment A. 1993. Adaptation biologique et variation dans l'espe `ce humaine : le cas des Pygme ´es d'Afrique. Bulletin et Me ´moires de la Socie ´te ´d'anthropologie de Paris 5:417-448.
  5. Hewlett B. 1996. Cultural diversity among African Pygmies. In: Kent S, editor. Cultural diversity among twentieth-century foragers. An African perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- versity Press. p 215-244.
  6. Mercader J, editor. 2003. Under the canopy. The archaeology of tropical rain forests. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  7. Phillipson DW. 2005. African archaeology. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press.
  8. Turnbull CM. 1965. Wayward servants, the two worlds of the African Pygmies. New York: The Natural History Press.
  9. Weiner JS, Lourie JA. 1981. Practical human biology. London; New York: Academic Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Becker, N. S. A., Verdu, P., Froment, A., Le Bomin, S., Pagezy, H., Bahuchet, S., & Heyer, E.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Corresponding author
Becker, Noémie S.A.
Venue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-05-03
Volume
145
Issue
3
Pages
390-401
ISSN
  • 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-8644
OpenAlex
W2032445644
Cited by
64
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Physical Anthropology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
short stature, genetic admixture, genetic similarity, anthropometry, climate change adaptation, forest density, adaptive evolution
MeSH terms
Adult, Africa, Central, Analysis of Variance, Body Height, Female, Genetics, Population, Geography, Humans, Male, Cluster Analysis, Case-Control Studies, Computational Biology, Black People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review