Cited by 31Archaeological and Geological StudiesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

Aggressive or funerary cannibalism? Skull‐cup and human bone manipulation in Cueva de El Toro (Early Neolithic, southern Iberia)

Open access
Santana, Jonathan, Rodríguez‐Santos, Francisco Javier, Camalich‐Massieu, María Dolores, Martín‐Socas, Dimas, Fregel, Rosa·2019·American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract

Objective We analyze the processing sequence involved in the manufacture of a skull-cup and the manipulation of human bones from the Early Neolithic of Cueva de El Toro (Málaga, Spain). Materials and methods The Early Neolithic material studied includes human remains found in two separate assemblages. Assemblage A consists of one skull-cup, a non-manipulated adult human mandible, and four ceramic vessels. Assemblage B contains manipulated and non-manipulated human remains that appeared mingled with domestic waste. Using a taphonomic approach, we evaluate the skull-cup processing and the anthropogenic alteration of human bones. Results The skull-cup was processed by careful paring away of skin, fragmentation of the facial skeleton and base of the skull, and controlled percussion of the edges of the calotte to achieve a regular shape. It was later boiled for some time in a container that caused pot polish in a specific area. The other human bones appeared scattered throughout the living area, mixed with other remains of domestic activity. Some of these bones show cut marks, percussion damage for marrow extraction, and tooth/chewing marks. Discussion Evidence from Cueva de El Toro suggests that cannibalism was conducted in the domestic sphere, likely following ritualized practices where the skull-cup could have played a part. Interpretation of this evidence suggests two hypotheses: (a) aggressive cannibalism relates to extreme inter-group violence; and (b) funerary cannibalism i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajpa.23805

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 89 · Cited by 31

Authors
Santana, J., Rodríguez‐Santos, F. J., Camalich‐Massieu, M. D., Martín‐Socas, D., & Fregel, R.
Affiliations
  • Durham University (GB)
  • Instituto Internacional de Investigaciones Prehistóricas de Cantabria, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander Spain
  • Departamento de Geografía e Historia. Área de Prehistoria Universidad de La Laguna San Cristóbal de La Laguna Spain
  • Universidad de La Laguna (ES)
Corresponding author
Santana, Jonathan
Venue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-02-25
Volume
169
Issue
1
Pages
31-54
ISSN
  • 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-8644
OpenAlex
W2916426107
Cited by
31
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
25.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • American Journal of Physical Anthropology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Acceda (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Secretaría de Estado de Investigacion, Desarrollo e Innovacion (HAR2016‐78197‐P)
  • European Commission (H2020‐MSCA‐IF‐2016, GA 750460)
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (HAR2016‐78197‐P)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
cannibalism, taphonomy, Early Neolithic, Málaga, ritual, cut marks, marrow extraction, tooth marks, household waste, southern Iberian Peninsula
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Archaeology, Cannibalism, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Funeral Rites, Humans, Infant, Male, Skull, Spain, Violence, History, Ancient, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review