A systematic review and meta‐analysis of asthma outcomes following endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis
Abstract
Background Patients suffering from both chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and asthma demonstrate improved asthma outcomes when upper airway inflammation is controlled with medications. It is unclear if similar benefits exist when the upper airway is treated surgically. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) on asthma outcomes. Methods Ovid MEDLINE and the Cochrane databases were searched to identify studies examining asthma outcomes in patients with CRS following ESS. Included studies involved a cohort of at least 5 patients and reported at least 1 postoperative asthma outcome. Results Twenty-two studies involving a total of 891 patients were identified. Mean follow-up across all studies was 26.4 months. Patients reported improved overall asthma control in 76.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.9% to 80.3%) of cases. The frequency of asthma attacks decreased in 84.8% (95% CI, 76.6% to 93.0%) of patients and the number of hospitalizations decreased in 64.4% (95% CI, 53.3% to 75.6%). Decreased use of oral corticosteroids was seen in 72.8% (95% CI, 67.5% to 78.1%) of patients; inhaled corticosteroid use decreased in 28.5% (95% CI, 22.6% to 34.5%) and bronchodilator use decreased in 36.3% (95% CI, 28.9% to 43.7%) of patients. Mean improvement in predicted forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1 ) was 1.62%, but was not statistically significant (p = 0.877). Conclusion ESS in patients with concomitant bronch…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Surgery may be beneficial in patients with nasal polyps with associated asthma, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, or cystic fibrosis.
“Surgery may be beneficial in patients with NP with associated asthma [228,229], AERD [230], or cystic fibrosis [231-233].”
From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [228]
Cites
Fokkens, W. J., Lund, V. J., Mullol, J., Bachert, C., Alobid, I., Baroody, F., Cohen, N., Cervin, A., Douglas, R., Gevaert, P., et al. (2012) · Rhinology journal · doi:10.4193/rhino12.000 · Cited by 2,387 · see citing works
Self-citationDurham, S. R., Ying, S., Varney, V. A., Jacobson, M. R., Sudderick, R. M., Mackay, I. S., Kay, A. B., & Hamid, Q. A. (1992) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.148.8.2390 · Cited by 557 · see citing works
Corren, J., Adinoff, A. D., Buchmeier, A. D., & Irvin, C. G. (1992) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/0091-6749(92)90079-h · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Impact of intranasal corticosteroids on asthma outcomes in allergic rhinitis: a meta‐analysis
Lohia, S., Schlosser, R. J., & Soler, Z. M. (2013) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.12124 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Clinical Practice Guideline (Update): Adult Sinusitis
Rosenfeld, R. M., Piccirillo, J. F., Chandrasekhar, S. S., Brook, I., Ashok Kumar, K., Kramper, M., Orlandi, R. R., Palmer, J. N., Patel, Z. M., Peters, A., et al. (2015) · Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1177/0194599815572097 · Cited by 1,159 · see citing works
International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis
Orlandi, R. R., Kingdom, T. T., Hwang, P. H., Smith, T. L., Alt, J. A., Baroody, F. M., Batra, P. S., Bernal‐Sprekelsen, M., Bhattacharyya, N., Chandra, R. K., et al. (2016) · International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology · doi:10.1002/alr.21695 · Cited by 892 · see citing works
Self-citationPosition Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment
SEAIC Rhinoconjunctivitis Committee & SEORL Rhinology, A., Valero, A., Navarro, A., del Cuvillo, A., Alobid, I., Benito, Jr., Colás, C., de los Santos, G., Fernández Liesa, R., García-Lliberós, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.18176/jiaci.0232 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vashishta, R., Soler, Z. M., Nguyen, S. A., & Schlosser, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schlosser, Rodney J.
- Venue
- International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 788-794
- ISSN
- 2042-6976 (ISSN-L)
- 2042-6984
- OpenAlex
- W1532473166
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Veterans Affairs at the Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
- Keywords
- endoscopic sinus surgery, chronic rhinosinusitis, asthma, asthma control, asthma exacerbations, hospitalization, oral corticosteroid use, inhaled corticosteroids, bronchodilators, lung function, FEV1, upper airway inflammation
- MeSH terms
- Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Asthma, Chronic Disease, Endoscopy, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Paranasal Sinuses, Peak Expiratory Flow Rate, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Rhinitis, Sinusitis, Treatment Outcome, Anti-Asthmatic Agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review