The DOI matches its Crossref record.
When do the risks of repeated courses of corticosteroids exceed the risks of surgery?
Abstract
Background The management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) becomes unclear when patients require multiple courses of corticosteroids to maintain quality of life. Repeated courses of corticosteroids carry increased risks to patients. Although endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is an effective therapeutic modality, it also carries inherent risks. This study aims to identify the threshold at which the risks of repeated courses of corticosteroid exceed the risks of surgery. Methods An evidence-based risk analysis was simulated using literature-reported complication rates, quality of life changes, and Medicare costs. Simulations were performed from the Medicare patient perspective, societal perspective, and the universal healthcare patient perspective. Results All 3 simulations demonstrate a breakeven threshold favoring surgery over medical therapy when patients require oral corticosteroids (OCS) more often than once every 2 years in CRSwNP, once per year in CRSwNP/asthma, or twice per year for Samter's triad patients. Conclusion This represents the first rationalized evidence-based analysis for when surgery should be considered in place of repeated courses of oral corticosteroids. This threshold provides a guide for otolaryngologists to use when making clinical decisions with patients.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Endoscopic surgical treatment may be more cost-effective in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.
“In CRS with NP , endoscopic surgical treatment has been shown to be beneficial in patients with severe symptoms who do not respond to appropriate medical treatment [20,127,128,212-218] and may be more cost-effective [219,220].”
From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [219]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- 2010, Red Book 2010: Pharmacy's Fundamental Reference
- 10.1023/A:1025889125822 · DOI
- 10.1023/B:REHO.0000018024.53114.3a · DOI
- 10.1007/s10640-006-9000-8 · DOI
- 10.1002/pam.10026 · DOI
- 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.6.993 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/cpt1972135part1694 · DOI
- 10.1016/0165-0327(83)90022-8 · DOI · Paper page
- McDougall R, 1994, Outcome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving prednisone compared to matched controls, J Rheumatol, 21, 1207
- 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03389.x · DOI
- 10.1359/JBMR.040134 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/00001648-199103000-00005 · DOI
- 10.1093/rheumatology/keg029 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.22294 · DOI
- 10.1002/lary.21446 · DOI
- 10.1002/alr.20101 · DOI
- 10.2500/ajr.2006.20.2923 · DOI
- 10.1288/00005537-199409000-00006 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00405-012-1973-z · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mcna.2007.03.007 · DOI
- 10.1001/archinte.163.14.1711 · DOI
- 10.1097/00000542-200212000-00038 · DOI
- 10.1177/000348941112000304 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis
Orlandi, R. R., Kingdom, T. T., Hwang, P. H., Smith, T. L., Alt, J. A., Baroody, F. M., Batra, P. S., Bernal‐Sprekelsen, M., Bhattacharyya, N., Chandra, R. K., et al. (2016) · International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology · doi:10.1002/alr.21695 · Cited by 892
Self-citationPosition Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment
SEAIC Rhinoconjunctivitis Committee & SEORL Rhinology, A., Valero, A., Navarro, A., del Cuvillo, A., Alobid, I., Benito, Jr., Colás, C., de los Santos, G., Fernández Liesa, R., García-Lliberós, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.18176/jiaci.0232 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Leung, R. M., Dinnie, K., & Smith, T. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Ontario Genomics (CA)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Leung, Randy M.
- Venue
- International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-08-21
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 871-876
- ISSN
- 2042-6976 (ISSN-L)
- 2042-6984
- OpenAlex
- W1867205692
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 5.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, endoscopic sinus surgery, oral corticosteroids, surgical versus medical treatment, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, asthma, sinus surgery complications, quality of life, health care costs, Medicare spending, societal perspective
- MeSH terms
- Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Chronic Disease, Humans, Nasal Polyps, Postoperative Care, Rhinitis, Sinusitis, Drug Costs, Health Care Costs, Cost of Illness, Risk Assessment, Evidence-Based Medicine, Nasal Surgical Procedures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review