Cited by 839Bone health and osteoporosis researchMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

A meta-analysis of prior corticosteroid use and fracture risk.

Kanis, John A, Johansson, Helena, Oden, Anders, Johnell, Olof, de Laet, Chris, Melton, L Joseph, Tenenhouse, Alan, Reeve, Jonathan +5 more·2004·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

The relationship between use of corticosteroids and fracture risk was estimated in a meta-analysis of data from seven cohort studies of ∼42,000 men and women. Current and past use of corticosteroids was an important predictor of fracture risk that was independent of prior fracture and BMD. Introduction: The aims of this study were to validate that corticosteroid use is a significant risk factor for fracture in an international setting and to explore the effects of age and sex on this risk. Materials and Methods: We studied 42,500 men and women from seven prospectively studied cohorts followed for 176,000 patient-years. The cohorts comprised the EPOS/EVOS study, CaMos, the Rotterdam Study, Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study (DOES), and prospective cohorts at Sheffield, Rochester, and Gothenburg. The effect of ever use of corticosteroids, BMD, age, and sex on all fracture, osteoporotic fracture, and hip fracture risk alone was examined using Poisson regression in each cohort and for each sex. The results of the different studies were merged from the weighted β coefficients. Results: Previous corticosteroid use was associated with a significantly increased risk of any fracture, osteoporotic fracture, and hip fracture when adjusted for BMD. Relative risk of any fracture ranged from 1.98 at the age of 50 years to 1.66 at the age of 85 years. For osteoporotic fracture, the range of relative risk was 2.63-1.71, and for hip fracture 4.42-2.48. The estimate of relative risk was higher at younger ages, but not significantly so. No significant difference in risk was seen between men and women. The risk was marginally and not significantly upwardly adjusted when BMD was excluded from the model. The risk was independent of prior fracture. In the three cohorts that documented current corticosteroid use, BMD was significantly reduced at the femoral neck, but fracture risk was still only partly explained by BMD. Conclusion: We conclude that prior and current exposure to corticosteroids confers an increased risk of fracture that is of substantial importance beyond that explained by the measurement of BMD. Its identification on an international basis validates the use of this risk factor in case-finding strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1359/jbmr.040134

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kanis, J. A., Johansson, H., Oden, A., Johnell, O., de Laet, C., Melton, L. J., Tenenhouse, A., Reeve, J., Silman, A. J., Pols, H. A., Eisman, J. A., McCloskey, E. V., & Mellstrom, D.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases (WHO Collaborating Centre), University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • Consulting Statistician, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Department of Orthopaedics, Malmo General Hospital, Malmo, Sweden
  • Institute for Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Montreal General Hospital (CA)
  • Strangeway's Research Laboratory, Wort's Causeway, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
  • Garvan Institute of Medical Research (AU)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Department of Geriatric Medicine, Goteborg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
2004-06-01
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
893-899
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W1983391342
Cited by
839
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 38
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • International Osteoporosis Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
corticosteroid use, fracture risk, osteoporotic fractures, hip fracture, bone mineral density, age and sex differences, osteoporosis risk factors, case finding
MeSH terms
Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Fractures, Bone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review