Cited by 2Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

White matter microstructure and cognitive functioning across healthy older adults with different APOE alleles

Lacey, Colleen, Gawryluk, Jodie·2021·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

Background: APOE alleles play an important neurobiological role in the development of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), including modifying structure of white matter in the brain and cognitive decline (Gold et al., 2012; Reas et al., 2019). However, certain alleles (i.e., APOE‐e4) have be studied more than others (i.e., APOE‐e2 & e3), and have been primarily studied in individuals already diagnosed with AD, rather than in healthy older adults. While APOE‐e4 is well establish risk factor for AD, APOE‐e2 may play a role in protective mechanisms against AD, and APOE‐e3 may be neutral, yet their underlying neural mechanisms and association with cognitive functioning in the healthy aging brain are equivocal (Suri et al., 2013). Thus, the current study aimed to investigate the influence of different APOE alleles on white matter microstructure and cognition in healthy older adults. Method: White matter microstructure, memory, and executive functioning (EF) were compared between cognitively normal older adults with either APOE‐e2+ (n= 16, mean age= 76), APOE e3e3 (n= 64, mean age= 74), or APOE‐e4+ (n=35, mean age=73). White matter microstructure was compared using Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Track‐based spatial statistics (TBSS) methods to derive fractional anisotropy (FA). Whole‐brain mean FA was compared first between e3e3 and e2+ and then between e3e3 and e4+ groups. Memory and executive functioning composite scores were compared, including covariates of age, sex, and education levels, using multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA). All data were retrieved from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Result: No significant differences in white matter microstructure (FA; p> 0.05, corrected) were observed. Further, groups were not significantly different in memory, EF, age, sex, or education levels (p=0.59). Conclusion: These results indicate that white matter microstructure, memory, and EF changes are not evident in the healthy brain as a function of APOE allele presence. DTI may not be sensitive to APOE‐related changes in the healthy brain; nonetheless, future investigations should evaluate whether other structural (e.g., grey matter volume) and functional (e.g., fMRI) differences are evident across different APOE alleles in this population, as well as examine other cognitive domains.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/alz.051190

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lacey, C., & Gawryluk, J.
Affiliations
University of Victoria (CA)
Corresponding author
Lacey, Colleen
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-12
Volume
17
Issue
S1
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W4205716735
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
APOE alleles, APOE ε4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review