Cited by 5Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksComputational Drug Discovery MethodsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Integrating multi‐omics data for target and biomarker discovery

Open access
Arnold, Matthias, the Alzheimer’s Disease Metabolomics Consortium·2024·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

Background: Despite recent breakthroughs, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) remains untreatable. In addition, we are still lacking robust biomarkers for early diagnosis and promising novel targets for therapeutic intervention. To enable utilizing the entirety of molecular evidence in the discovery and prioritization of potential novel biomarkers and targets, we have developed the AD Atlas, a network‐based multi‐omics data integration platform. Through recent extensions, the AD Atlas provides a comprehensive database of high‐quality multi‐omics data that can be utilized for hypothesis‐free ranking of molecular markers and disease modules, as well as prioritization of potential novel targets and drug repositioning candidates. Method: We developed several graph‐based analysis tools from proximity searches to applications of artificial intelligence that can be applied to the AD Atlas. For prioritization of potential targets and biomarkers, we derived several network‐based metrics to score ‐omics entities for disease relevance by not only assessing evidence for a single marker but also for its functional neighborhood in the AD Atlas network. For disease module identification, we employed graph representation learning coupled with unsupervised clustering to extract functional modules as defined by the network structure. Finally, we propose an ensemble approach that enables weighted aggregation of drug repositioning predictions from both signature‐based and network‐based algorithms. Result: We demonstrate that the AD Atlas enables complex computational analyses for target and biomarker discovery and prioritization as well as in silico drug repositioning in AD. Using the integrated scores for prioritizing single targets and biomarkers for AD, we observe significantly higher relevance scores for genes that have been nominated as promising targets by the AMP‐AD consortium. We further find that extracted disease modules are enriched for specific AD‐relevant biological domains and can be ranked by disease relevance using similar graph‐based metrics. Finally, we demonstrate that drug repositioning candidates are significantly enriched for compounds that were or are being tested in clinical trials for AD. Conclusion: High‐quality, multi‐omics networks, such as the AD Atlas, enable exploitation of large‐scale heterogeneous data through computational applications for target, biomarker, disease module, and drug repositioning candidate discovery and prioritization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/alz.086331

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Effective integration of multi-omics data remains a significant challenge due to differences in data scale, noise characteristics, missing value patterns, and weak biological signals relative to technical variation.

    “However, effective integration of such data remains a significant challenge due to differences in data scale, noise characteristics, missing value patterns, and the often weak biological signals relative to technical variation224.”

    From Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics approaches in Alzheimer's disease: Progress, challenges, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as [224]

    The Background describes the AD Atlas as a multi-omics integration platform, and the Conclusion says it can use heterogeneous data. Neither section says integration remains a significant challenge or attributes that challenge to differences in scale, noise, missing values, or weak biological signals; searches for those terms found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Arnold, M., & the Alzheimer’s Disease Metabolomics Consortium
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Arnold, Matthias
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-12
Volume
20
Issue
S1
Pages
e086331-e086331
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W4406050423
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, multi-omics integration
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Biomarkers, Drug Repositioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review