Cited by 176Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCerebrovascular and genetic disordersFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Brain Chart of Aging: Machine‐learning analytics reveals links between brain aging, white matter disease, amyloid burden, and cognition in the iSTAGING consortium of 10,216 harmonized MR scans

Open access

Abstract

Introduction: Relationships between brain atrophy patterns of typical aging and Alzheimer's disease (AD), white matter disease, cognition, and AD neuropathology were investigated via machine learning in a large harmonized magnetic resonance imaging database (11 studies; 10,216 subjects). Methods: Three brain signatures were calculated: Brain‐age, AD‐like neurodegeneration, and white matter hyperintensities (WMHs). Brain Charts measured and displayed the relationships of these signatures to cognition and molecular biomarkers of AD. Results: WMHs were associated with advanced brain aging, AD‐like atrophy, poorer cognition, and AD neuropathology in mild cognitive impairment (MCI)/AD and cognitively normal (CN) subjects. High WMH volume was associated with brain aging and cognitive decline occurring in an ≈10‐year period in CN subjects. WMHs were associated with doubling the likelihood of amyloid beta (Aβ) positivity after age 65. Brain aging, AD‐like atrophy, and WMHs were better predictors of cognition than chronological age in MCI/AD. Discussion: A Brain Chart quantifying brain‐aging trajectories was established, enabling the systematic evaluation of individuals’ brain‐aging patterns relative to this large consortium.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/alz.12178

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 43 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–176 of 176

Metadata

Authors
Habes, M., Pomponio, R., Shou, H., Doshi, J., Mamourian, E., Erus, G., Nasrallah, I., Launer, L. J., Rashid, T., Bilgel, M., Fan, Y., Toledo, J. B., Yaffe, K., Sotiras, A., Srinivasan, D., Espeland, M., Masters, C., Maruff, P., Fripp, J., Völzk, H., Johnson, S. C., Morris, J. C., Albert, M. S., Miller, M. I., Bryan, R. N., Grabe, H. J., Resnick, S. M., Wolk, D. A., Davatzikos, C., & for the iSTAGING consortium, T. P. A. C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • National Institute on Aging (US)
  • Houston Methodist (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • CSIRO Health and Biosecurity Australian e‐Health Research Centre CSIRO Australia
  • Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE)
Corresponding author
Habes, Mohamad
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-09-13
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
89-102
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W3084546953
Cited by
173
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 2
FWCI
15.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od023495-01)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG063887, P30AG049638, U19AG033655, RF1AG059869, RF1AG054409, P30AG066507, P30AG062715, U01AG068057)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HHSN271201600059C)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (HHSN271201600059C)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB022573)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
brain aging, white matter hyperintensities
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Atrophy, Brain, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Disease Progression, Young Adult, Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases, Cognitive Dysfunction, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review