Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Homocysteine, silent brain infarcts, and white matter lesions: The Rotterdam scan study

Vermeer, Sarah E., Van Dijk, Ewoud J., Koudstaal, Peter J., Oudkerk, Matthijs, Hofman, Albert, Clarke, Robert, Breteler, Monique M.B.·2002·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Silent brain infarcts and white matter lesions are frequently seen on magnetic resonance imaging in healthy elderly people and both are associated with an increased risk of stroke and dementia. Plasma total homocysteine may be a potentially modifiable risk factor for stroke and dementia. We examined whether elevated total homocysteine levels are associated with silent brain infarcts and white matter lesions. The Rotterdam Scan Study is a population‐based study of 1,077 people aged 60 to 90 years who had cerebral magnetic resonance imaging. The cross‐sectional relation of total homocysteine with silent infarcts and white matter lesions was analyzed with adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors. The mean plasma total homocysteine level was 11.5μmol/l (standard deviation 4.1). The risk of silent brain infarcts increased with increasing total homocysteine levels (odds ratio 1.24/standard deviation increase, 95% confidence interval 1.06–1.45). The severity of periventricular white matter lesions and extent of subcortical white matter lesions were also significantly associated with total homocysteine levels, even after excluding those with silent brain infarcts. The overall risk of having either a silent brain infarct or severe white matter lesions was strongly associated with total homocysteine levels (odds ratio 1.35/standard deviation increase, 95% confidence interval 1.16–1.58). We concluded that total homocysteine levels are associated with silent brain infarcts and white matter lesions independent of each other and of other cardiovascular risk factors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.10111

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 355

Metadata

Authors
Vermeer, S. E., Van Dijk, E. J., Koudstaal, P. J., Oudkerk, M., Hofman, A., Clarke, R., & Breteler, M. M. B.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-02-28
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
285-289
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2137466170
Cited by
355
References
2
FWCI
16.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Homocysteine, silent brain infarcts, and white matter lesions: The Rotterdam scan study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.10111
The paper
Vermeer, S. E., Van Dijk, E. J., Koudstaal, P. J., Oudkerk, M., Hofman, A., Clarke, R., & Breteler, M. M. B. (2002). Homocysteine, silent brain infarcts, and white matter lesions: The Rotterdam scan study. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.10111

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.