Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A randomized sequential trial of creatine in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Jan Groeneveld, Geert, Veldink, Jan H., van der Tweel, Ingeborg, Kalmijn, Sandra, Beijer, Cornelis, de Visser, Marianne, Wokke, John H. J., Franssen, Hessel, Berg, Leonard H. van den·2003·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal disease with no cure. In a transgenic mouse model of ALS, creatine monohydrate showed a promising increase in survival. We performed a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, sequential clinical trial to assess the effect of creatine monohydrate on survival and disease progression in patients with ALS. Between June 2000 and December 2001, 175 patients with probable, probable‐laboratory supported, or definite ALS were randomly assigned to receive either creatine monohydrate or placebo 10gm daily. A sequential trial design was used with death, persistent assisted ventilation, or tracheostomy as primary end points. Secondary outcome measurements were rate of decline of isometric arm muscle strength, forced vital capacity, functional status, and quality of life. The trial was stopped when the null hypothesis of indifference was accepted. Creatine did not affect survival (cumulative survival probability of 0.70 in the creatine group vs 0.68 in the placebo group at 12 months, and 0.52 in the creatine group vs 0.47 in the placebo group at 16 months), or the rate of decline of functional measurements. Creatine intake did not cause important adverse reactions. This placebo‐controlled trial did not find evidence of a beneficial effect of creatine monohydrate on survival or disease progression in patients with ALS. Ann Neurol 2003;53:437–445

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.10554

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 283

Metadata

Authors
Jan Groeneveld, G., Veldink, J. H., van der Tweel, I., Kalmijn, S., Beijer, C., de Visser, M., Wokke, J. H. J., Franssen, H., & Berg, L. H. V. D.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-03-24
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
437-445
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2152847494
Cited by
283
References
5
FWCI
15.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A randomized sequential trial of creatine in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.10554
The paper
Jan Groeneveld, G., Veldink, J. H., van der Tweel, I., Kalmijn, S., Beijer, C., de Visser, M., Wokke, J. H. J., Franssen, H., & Berg, L. H. V. D. (2003). A randomized sequential trial of creatine in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.10554

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.