Cited by 67

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Blinded positron emission tomography study of dopamine cell implantation for Parkinson's disease

Nakamura, Toshitaka, Dhawan, Vijay, Chaly, Thomas, Fukuda, Masafumi, Ma, Yilong, Breeze, Robert, Greene, Paul, Fahn, Stanley, Freed, Curt, Eidelberg, David·2001·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

We assessed nigrostriatal dopaminergic function in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients undergoing a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled surgical trial of embryonic dopamine cell implantation. Forty PD patients underwent positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with [18 F]fluorodopa (FDOPA) prior to randomization to transplantation or placebo surgery. The 39 surviving patients were rescanned 1 year following surgery. Images were quantified by investigators blinded to treatment status and clinical outcome. Following unblinding, we determined the effects of treatment status and age on the interval changes in FDOPA/PET signal. Blinded observers detected a significant increase in FDOPA uptake in the putamen of the group receiving implants compared to the placebo surgery patients (40.3%). Increases in putamen FDOPA uptake were similar in both younger (age ≤60 years) and older (age >60 years) transplant recipients. Significant decrements in putamen uptake were evident in younger placebo‐operated patients (–6.5% ) but not in their older counterparts. Correlations between the PET changes and clinical outcome were significant only in the younger patient subgroup (r = 0.58). The findings suggest that patient age does not influence graft viability or development in the first postoperative year. However, host age may influence the time course of the downstream functional changes that are needed for clinical benefit to occur.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.1075

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1056/NEJM200103083441002 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/jcbfm.1993.7 · DOI
  3. Dhawan V, 1996, Combined FDOPA and 3OMFD PET studies in Parkinson's disease, J Nucl Med, 37, 209
  4. 10.1002/ana.410340304 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/ana.410340306 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/mds.870050304 · DOI
  7. Takikawa S, 1994, Input functions for 6‐[fluorine‐18]fluorodopa quantitation in parkinsonism: comparative studies and clinical correlations, J Nucl Med, 35, 955
  8. Ishikawa T, 1996, Clinical significance of striatal DOPA decarboxylase activity in Parkinson's disease, J Nucl Med, 37, 216
  9. Ishikawa T, 1996, Comparative nigrostriatal dopaminergic imaging with iodine‐123‐beta CIT‐FP/SPECT and fluorine‐18‐FDOPA/PET, J Nucl Med, 37, 1760
  10. 10.1016/0166-2236(93)90143-A · DOI
  11. 10.1056/NEJM199211263272202 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/ana.410420115 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/16060 · DOI
  14. 10.1056/NEJM199504273321702 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/ana.410380406 · DOI
  16. 10.1001/archneur.56.2.179 · DOI
  17. Fahn S, 1987, Recent developments in Parkinson's disease, 293
  18. DeGrado TR, 1994, Performance characteristics of a whole‐body PET scanner, J Nucl Med, 35, 1398
  19. Hariz MI, 1986, Reproducibility of repeated mountings of a noninvasive CT/MRI stereoadapter, Appl Neurophysiol, 49, 336
  20. 10.1016/0883-2889(90)90191-I · DOI
  21. Winer BJ, 1971, Statistical principles in experimental design
  22. 10.1002/ana.410310207 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/1531-8249(200011)48:5<689::AID-ANA1>3.0.CO;2-N · DOI
  24. Feigin A, 2000, Levodopa infusion reduces the expression of a Parkinson's disease metabolic brain network: an FDG PET study, Neurology, 54, A113
  25. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-13-05563.1999 · DOI
  26. 10.1212/WNL.44.10.1777 · DOI
  27. 10.1097/00004647-199605000-00005 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1002/ana.410290617 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/ana.410360512 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/brain/119.6.2097 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 67

Metadata

Authors
Nakamura, T., Dhawan, V., Chaly, T., Fukuda, M., Ma, Y., Breeze, R., Greene, P., Fahn, S., Freed, C., & Eidelberg, D.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-07-30
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
181-187
ISSN
  • 0364-5134
  • 1531-8249
Cited by
67
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review