The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 6 of the 22 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Phase I trial of hES cell-derived dopaminergic neurons for Parkinson’s disease
Open accessAbstract
Fluoro-DOPA positron emission tomography uptake increased, indicating graft survival. Secondary and exploratory clinical outcomes showed improvement or stability, including improvement in the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III OFF scores by an average of 23 points in the high-dose cohort. There were no graft-induced dyskinesias. These data demonstrate safety and support future definitive clinical studies.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a first-in-human, open-label phase I trial, bilateral putaminal transplantation of the hES cell-derived dopaminergic neuron progenitor product bemdaneprocel met its 1-year safety and tolerability objectives in 12 patients with Parkinson’s disease. At 18 months, 18F-DOPA PET uptake increased in the putamen and MDS-UPDRS Part III OFF scores improved, especially in the high-dose cohort, with no graft-induced dyskinesias reported.
Key findings
- Twelve patients were enrolled sequentially into low-dose (0.9 million cells per putamen, n = 5) and high-dose (2.7 million cells per putamen, n = 7) cohorts; all received 1 year of immunosuppression. The primary safety/tolerability criteria were satisfied at 12 months, with no adverse events related to the cell product and no deaths, tumours, abnormal tissue overgrowth or intracerebral haemorrhages detected by MRI.
- At 18 months after transplantation, MDS-UPDRS Part III OFF scores decreased by a mean (s.d.) of 8.6 points (29.2) in the low-dose cohort and 23.0 points (7.9) in the high-dose cohort. Mean good ON times increased by 0.2 h (3.8 h) in the low-dose cohort and 2.7 h (1.6 h) in the high-dose cohort.
- Putaminal 18F-DOPA PET uptake increased bilaterally across cohorts, supporting graft survival through 18 months, 6 months after immunosuppression discontinuation; caudate uptake was stable to decreased. There were no reports of graft-induced dyskinesias through 18 months.
- Through 18 months, there were 78 cumulative treatment-emergent adverse events; most were mild or moderate, and none were related to bemdaneprocel. Two serious adverse events occurred at 12 months: one COVID-19 hospitalization and one seizure attributed to surgery; a later gastrointestinal haemorrhage at approximately 15 months was assessed as unrelated.
Methods
- First-in-human, multisite, open-label phase I trial (NCT04802733) of cryopreserved, off-the-shelf bemdaneprocel derived from hES cells, grafted bilaterally into the post-commissural putamen via nine deposits per putamen in a single surgical session.
- Participants had confirmed Parkinson’s disease; 12 were enrolled sequentially into low-dose then high-dose cohorts after a 30-day data safety monitoring committee pause. Median age was 67.0 years, 75% were male, and median time since diagnosis was 9 years.
- Outcomes included safety/tolerability at 1 year, 18F-DOPA PET imaging at baseline, 12 and 18 months, MDS-UPDRS Part III OFF and adjusted PD diary good ON times, plus exploratory motor, non-motor and quality-of-life measures. Analyses were descriptive by cohort; no inferential statistical testing was performed because of the small number of participants.
Limitations
- The paper states that the study was open-label, small, relatively short in observation, and not designed or powered to determine efficacy; expected PD symptom fluctuations and substantial placebo effects may influence results.
- The paper states that PET data have limitations in resolution, signal-to-noise ratio and variability across and within patients and between dose cohorts, and that correlation between 18F-DOPA PET uptake and clinical performance can be variable. It also notes unknown kinetics of graft maturation and disease vulnerability, complicating dose-finding.
- Evident from the design: there was no placebo or control arm and no blinding, and cohorts were enrolled sequentially rather than randomized, so efficacy signals cannot be attributed to the cell product alone.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
6 of 22 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The high dose targets the estimated number of healthy DA neurons in the intact substantia nigra (300,000).
“The high dose targets the estimated number of healthy DA neurons in the intact substantia nigra35 (300,000 DA neurons), and the lower dose targets the estimated minimal number of surviving grafted DA neurons required for clinical benefit36 (100,000 DA neurons).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Rudow, G. et al. Morphometry of the human substantia nigra in ageing and Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 115, 461–470 (2008). source
The Discussion reports a mean of 305,000 pigmented neurons on one side of the substantia nigra in healthy older controls, close to the cited 300,000. It reports 424,000 in young controls, however, and the 305,000 figure counts pigmented neurons rather than specifically DA neurons. The unqualified estimate of 300,000 healthy DA neurons is therefore more general than this measurement supports. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
The absence of GID in this study through 18 months may relate to the lack of serotonergic neuron contaminants in bemdaneprocel.
“The absence of GID in our study through 18 months is therefore particularly notable. This may relate to the lack of serotonergic neuron contaminants in bemdaneprocel, as preclinical studies confirmed the absence of serotonergic neurons in vitro and in vivo at 9 months after grafting34.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Piao, J. et al. Preclinical efficacy and safety of a human embryonic stem cell-derived midbrain dopamine progenitor product, MSK-DA01. Cell Stem Cell 28, 217–229 (2021). source
In Results and discussion, the Parkinsonian-rat graft analysis reports negative 5-HT staining, suggesting an absence of human serotonergic neurons in vivo. The cited paper does not establish their absence in vitro; its separate graft follow-up extends to day 266. The proposed link to the citing study’s absence of GID is the citing authors’ inference, not a finding attributed to this preclinical paper. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
There were no graft-induced dyskinesias.
“There were no graft-induced dyskinesias.”
- Also stated in: § Safety and tolerability · plain
“Notably, there were no reports of adverse events or clinical indications of graft-induced dyskinesias (GIDs) to date.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Safety and tolerability · plain
- Findingown data
There were no deaths.
“There were no deaths, no SAEs related to transplanted cells or immunosuppression, and there were no tumours, abnormal tissue overgrowth or intracerebral haemorrhages detected with MRI, which showed the expected postoperative changes (Extended Data Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Good ON times increased by 0.2 h (3.8 h) from baseline to 12.3 h (3.2 h) in the low-dose cohort.
“The mean good ON times, based on adjusted PD diaries, increased by 0.2 h (3.8 h) from the baseline to 12.3 h (3.2 h) in the low-dose cohort and by 2.7 h (1.6 h) from the baseline to 13.6 h (1.9 h) in the high-dose cohort (Fig. 2c,d).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Across the total study population, ON times with troublesome dyskinesias were similar to baseline.
“Across the total study population, ON times with troublesome dyskinesias (Extended Data Table 7) and use of antiparkinsonian medications were similar to the baseline (Extended Data Table 8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
PDQ-39 summary index increased (worsened) by 0.4 points (7.4) from baseline to 25.4 (6.8) in the low-dose cohort.
“The mean (s.d.) PDQ-39 summary index scores increased (worsened) by 0.4 points (7.4) from the baseline to 25.4 (6.8) in the low-dose cohort and decreased (improved) by 4.2 points (8.2) from the baseline to 10.9 (8.7) in the high-dose cohort (Extended Data Table 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Safety data through 18 months continued to indicate a favourable safety profile.
“Safety data through 18 months continued to indicate a favourable safety profile.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MDS-UPDRS Part III ON scores improved with decrease mean 8.4 points (5.6) from baseline to 15.9 (8.9) in the high-dose cohort.
“Among the exploratory end points (Fig. 2e–h), MDS-UPDRS Part III ON scores also improved with a decrease in the mean (s.d.) of 7.6 points (15.3) from the baseline to 13.4 (7.3) in the low-dose cohort and of 8.4 points (5.6) from the baseline to 15.9 (8.9) in the high-dose cohort (Fig. 2e).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No adverse events were related to the cell product.
“with no adverse events related to the cell product.”
- Also stated in: § Safety and tolerability · plain
“No TEAEs were related to bemdaneprocel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Safety and tolerability · plain
- Findingown data
At 18 months, MDS-UPDRS Part III OFF decreased by mean 23.0 points (s.d. 7.9) from baseline to 25.2 (8.7) in the high-dose cohort.
“At 18 months after transplantation, the MDS-UPDRS Part III showed improvement in the OFF state with a decrease in mean (s.d.) of 8.6 points (29.2) from the baseline to 34.6 (9.2) in the low-dose cohort, and a mean decrease of 23.0 points (7.9) from the baseline to 25.2 (8.7) in the high-dose cohort (Fig. 2a,b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At 18 months, MDS-UPDRS Part III OFF decreased by mean 8.6 points (s.d. 29.2) from baseline to 34.6 (9.2) in the low-dose cohort.
“At 18 months after transplantation, the MDS-UPDRS Part III showed improvement in the OFF state with a decrease in mean (s.d.) of 8.6 points (29.2) from the baseline to 34.6 (9.2) in the low-dose cohort, and a mean decrease of 23.0 points (7.9) from the baseline to 25.2 (8.7) in the high-dose cohort (Fig. 2a,b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At 18 months after grafting, putaminal 18F-DOPA PET uptake increased.
“At 18 months after grafting, putaminal 18Fluoro-DOPA positron emission tomography uptake increased, indicating graft survival.”
- Also stated in: § Graft survival · plain
“Quantitative analysis using the volume of interest (VOI) method revealed an increase in the mean uptake across the low- and high-dose cohorts bilaterally in the putamen, and stable to decreased uptake in the caudate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Graft survival · plain
- Findingnone given
The study achieved its primary outcome.
“that achieved its primary outcome”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
OFF times decreased by 0.8 h (3.3 h) from baseline to 2.5 h (3.1 h) in the low-dose cohort.
“The mean (s.d.) OFF times, based on adjusted PD diaries, decreased by 0.8 h (3.3 h) from the baseline to 2.5 h (3.1 h) in the low-dose cohort and decreased by 2.7 h (1.8 h) from the baseline to 2.3 h (1.9 h) in the high-dose cohort (Fig. 2f).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Good ON times increased by 2.7 h (1.6 h) from baseline to 13.6 h (1.9 h) in the high-dose cohort.
“The mean good ON times, based on adjusted PD diaries, increased by 0.2 h (3.8 h) from the baseline to 12.3 h (3.2 h) in the low-dose cohort and by 2.7 h (1.6 h) from the baseline to 13.6 h (1.9 h) in the high-dose cohort (Fig. 2c,d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MDS-UPDRS Part III ON scores improved with decrease mean 7.6 points (15.3) from baseline to 13.4 (7.3) in the low-dose cohort.
“Among the exploratory end points (Fig. 2e–h), MDS-UPDRS Part III ON scores also improved with a decrease in the mean (s.d.) of 7.6 points (15.3) from the baseline to 13.4 (7.3) in the low-dose cohort and of 8.4 points (5.6) from the baseline to 15.9 (8.9) in the high-dose cohort (Fig. 2e).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
OFF times decreased by 2.7 h (1.8 h) from baseline to 2.3 h (1.9 h) in the high-dose cohort.
“The mean (s.d.) OFF times, based on adjusted PD diaries, decreased by 0.8 h (3.3 h) from the baseline to 2.5 h (3.1 h) in the low-dose cohort and decreased by 2.7 h (1.8 h) from the baseline to 2.3 h (1.9 h) in the high-dose cohort (Fig. 2f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
One participant in the high-dose cohort experienced a single seizure attributed to the surgical procedure within 24 h of surgery that prolonged hospitalization by 1 day.
“There were two SAEs reported: one participant in the low-dose cohort was hospitalized overnight with COVID-19 approximately 2 months after the surgery and one participant in the high-dose cohort experienced a single seizure attributed to the surgical procedure within 24 h of surgery that prolonged hospitalization by 1 day.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
NMSS total scores trended towards stability in the high-dose cohort.
“The NMSS scores varied across domains, with total scores trending towards stability in the high-dose cohort (Extended Data Table 9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Secondary and exploratory clinical outcomes showed improvement or stability.
“Secondary and exploratory clinical outcomes showed improvement or stability, including improvement in the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III OFF scores by an average of 23 points in the high-dose cohort.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Through 18 months after transplantation, there were 78 cumulative treatment-emergent adverse events.
“Through 18 months after transplantation, there were 78 cumulative treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), described in Extended Data Tables 1–5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
UDysRS scores were similar to baseline in both cohorts.
“UDysRS scores were similar to the baseline in both cohorts (Fig. 2h).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Across the total study population, use of antiparkinsonian medications was similar to baseline.
“Across the total study population, ON times with troublesome dyskinesias (Extended Data Table 7) and use of antiparkinsonian medications were similar to the baseline (Extended Data Table 8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
MDS-UPDRS Part III OFF scores improved by an average of 23 points in the high-dose cohort at 18 months.
“Secondary and exploratory clinical outcomes showed improvement or stability, including improvement in the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III OFF scores by an average of 23 points in the high-dose cohort.”
- Also stated in: § Secondary and exploratory outcomes · plain
“At 18 months after transplantation, the MDS-UPDRS Part III showed improvement in the OFF state with a decrease in mean (s.d.) of 8.6 points (29.2) from the baseline to 34.6 (9.2) in the low-dose cohort, and a mean decrease of 23.0 points (7.9) from the baseline to 25.2 (8.7) in the high-dose cohort (Fig. 2a,b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Secondary and exploratory outcomes · plain
- Findingown data
One participant in the low-dose cohort was hospitalized overnight with COVID-19 approximately 2 months after surgery.
“There were two SAEs reported: one participant in the low-dose cohort was hospitalized overnight with COVID-19 approximately 2 months after the surgery and one participant in the high-dose cohort experienced a single seizure attributed to the surgical procedure within 24 h of surgery that prolonged hospitalization by 1 day.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
18F-DOPA uptake was stable to decreased in the caudate.
“Quantitative analysis using the volume of interest (VOI) method revealed an increase in the mean uptake across the low- and high-dose cohorts bilaterally in the putamen, and stable to decreased uptake in the caudate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The treatment process, including surgery and immunosuppression, was generally well tolerated.
“The treatment process, including surgery and immunosuppression, was generally well tolerated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
PDQ-39 summary index decreased (improved) by 4.2 points (8.2) from baseline to 10.9 (8.7) in the high-dose cohort.
“The mean (s.d.) PDQ-39 summary index scores increased (worsened) by 0.4 points (7.4) from the baseline to 25.4 (6.8) in the low-dose cohort and decreased (improved) by 4.2 points (8.2) from the baseline to 10.9 (8.7) in the high-dose cohort (Extended Data Table 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
One TEAE each of oral herpes and urinary tract infection was considered related to immunosuppression.
“Of the infections, one TEAE each of oral herpes and urinary tract infection was considered to be related to immunosuppression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No TEAEs were related to bemdaneprocel.
“No TEAEs were related to bemdaneprocel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
No tests of statistical significance were performed due to the small number of participants.
“No tests of statistical significance were performed due to the small number of participants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
18F-DOPA PET uptake data support DA neuron/graft survival through 18 months after transplantation, 6 months after discontinuation of immunosuppression.
“At 18 months after grafting, putaminal 18Fluoro-DOPA positron emission tomography uptake increased, indicating graft survival.”
- Also stated in: § Graft survival · plain
“These data support DA neuron survival through the 18-month post-transplantation timepoint, 6 months after discontinuation of immunosuppression.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
“An encouraging finding in our study was the evidence of likely graft survival on the basis of 18F-DOPA PET, 6 months after cessation of immunosuppression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Graft survival · plain
- Premisecitation
Data from one of the two randomized clinical trials suggested a potential decline in clinical function after discontinuation of immunosuppression.
“Data from one of the two randomized clinical trials suggested a potential decline in clinical function after discontinuation of immunosuppression25, yet autopsy reports in other studies demonstrated graft survival many years after surgery and discontinuation of immunosuppression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Olanow, C. W. et al. A double-blind controlled trial of bilateral fetal nigral transplantation in Parkinson’s disease. Ann. Neurol. 54, 403–414 (2003). source
- Interpretationown data
Coupled with stabilization or possible improvement in other secondary and exploratory motor, non-motor and quality-of-life outcomes, the data suggest a promise for potential clinical benefit.
“Coupled with the stabilization or possible improvement in other secondary and exploratory motor, non-motor and quality-of-life outcomes, the data suggest a promise for potential clinical benefit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Preclinical studies confirmed the absence of serotonergic neurons in bemdaneprocel in vitro and in vivo at 9 months after grafting.
“The absence of GID in our study through 18 months is therefore particularly notable. This may relate to the lack of serotonergic neuron contaminants in bemdaneprocel, as preclinical studies confirmed the absence of serotonergic neurons in vitro and in vivo at 9 months after grafting34.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Piao, J. et al. Preclinical efficacy and safety of a human embryonic stem cell-derived midbrain dopamine progenitor product, MSK-DA01. Cell Stem Cell 28, 217–229 (2021). source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Premisecitation
A high incidence of GID was reported in two randomized controlled trials of fetal ventral mesencephalic transplants (56% and 15%).
“A high incidence of GID was reported in two randomized controlled trials25,26 of fetal ventral mesencephalic transplants (56% (n = 13 out of 23) and 15% (n = 5 out of 33) of grafted participants).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [25] Olanow, C. W. et al. A double-blind controlled trial of bilateral fetal nigral transplantation in Parkinson’s disease. Ann. Neurol. 54, 403–414 (2003). source
- cites [26] Freed, C. R. et al. Transplantation of embryonic dopamine neurons for severe Parkinson’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 344, 710–719 (2001). source
- Study design and conductreasoning
The study was not designed to evaluate efficacy based on clinical outcomes.
“was not designed to evaluate efficacy based on clinical outcomes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The observed mean changes in MDS-UPDRS Part III OFF (8.6 low-dose, 23 high-dose) are consistent with a moderate and large clinically important difference in motor scores, respectively.
“Our data show a mean change of 8.6 points in the low-dose cohort and 23 points in the high-dose cohort, consistent with a moderate and large ‘clinically important difference’ in motor scores41, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Shulman, L. M. et al. The clinically important difference on the unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale. Arch. Neurol. 67, 64–70 (2010). source
- Study design and conductnone given
The cells passed a battery of tests including STR authentication, karyotype and marker expression, and testing for adventitious viruses and mycoplasma.
“The cells passed a battery of tests including cell authentication by short tandem repeat (STR) analysis, karyotype and marker expression, as well as testing for adventitious viruses and mycoplasma.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These data demonstrate safety.
“These data demonstrate safety and support future definitive clinical studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In past fetal allograft studies, the dosing, duration and type of immunosuppression was inconsistent.
“In past fetal allograft studies, the dosing, duration and type of immunosuppression was inconsistent.25,26,45.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [25] Olanow, C. W. et al. A double-blind controlled trial of bilateral fetal nigral transplantation in Parkinson’s disease. Ann. Neurol. 54, 403–414 (2003). source
- cites [26] Freed, C. R. et al. Transplantation of embryonic dopamine neurons for severe Parkinson’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 344, 710–719 (2001). source
- cites [45] Barker, R. A. Designing stem-cell-based dopamine cell replacement trials for Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Med. 25, 1045–1053 (2019). source
- Premisecitation
The lower dose targets the estimated minimal number of surviving grafted DA neurons required for clinical benefit (100,000).
“The high dose targets the estimated number of healthy DA neurons in the intact substantia nigra35 (300,000 DA neurons), and the lower dose targets the estimated minimal number of surviving grafted DA neurons required for clinical benefit36 (100,000 DA neurons).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Hagell, P. & Brundin, P. Cell survival and clinical outcome following intrastriatal transplantation in Parkinson disease. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 60, 741–752 (2001). source
- Probably not a substantial claim. 22
- It may state two separate claims as one. 26
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningAllografting without long-term immunosuppression, coupled with cryopreservation, offers an off-the-shelf approach that could facilitate broader application of this therapy in the future.
“the feasibility of allografting without long-term immunosuppression, coupled with cryopreservation, offers an off-the-shelf approach33,47 that could facilitate the broader application of this therapy in the future.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] Kim, T. W. et al. Biphasic activation of WNT signaling facilitates the derivation of midbrain dopamine neurons from hESCs for translational use. Cell Stem Cell 28, 343–355 (2021). source
The Results section on cryopreserved, off-the-shelf mDA cells reports high post-thaw viability, and the Discussion says the protocol should be suitable for a scalable product for human translation. But the graft experiments used immunocompromised rats; the paper does not establish that allografting is feasible without long-term immunosuppression. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [47] Kirkeby, A. et al. Preclinical quality, safety, and efficacy of a human embryonic stem cell-derived product for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease, STEM-PD. Cell Stem Cell 30, 1299–1314 (2023). source
The Discussion says STEM-PD is an allogeneic therapy using a banked, cryopreserved product that makes clinical planning easier. But the trial design specifies immunotherapy for 12 months after grafting; the paper does not establish that grafts remain viable without immunosuppression thereafter or that broader application is feasible. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThe 18F-DOPA PET SOR-1 method had been previously validated and used successfully in PET imaging studies of fetal cell transplantation.
“This method had been previously validated49,50 and used successfully in the PET imaging studies of fetal cell transplantation25,42,51,52.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 6 sources checked- cites [49] Dhawan, V. et al. Comparative analysis of striatal FDOPA uptake in Parkinson’s disease: ratio method versus graphical approach. J. Nucl. Med. 43, 1324–1330 (2002).
- cites [50] Jokinen, P. et al. Simple ratio analysis of 18F-fluorodopa uptake in striatal subregions separates patients with early Parkinson disease from healthy controls. J. Nucl. Med. 50, 893–899 (2009). source
- cites [25] Olanow, C. W. et al. A double-blind controlled trial of bilateral fetal nigral transplantation in Parkinson’s disease. Ann. Neurol. 54, 403–414 (2003). source
- cites [42] Ma, Y. et al. Dopamine cell implantation in Parkinson’s disease: long-term clinical and 18F-FDOPA PET outcomes. J. Nucl. Med. 51, 7–15 (2010). source
- cites [51] Nakamura, T. et al. Blinded positron emission tomography study of dopamine cell implantation for Parkinson’s disease. Ann. Neurol. 50, 181–187 (2001). source
- cites [52] Ma, Y. et al. Dyskinesia after fetal cell transplantation for parkinsonism: a PET study. Ann. Neurol. 52, 628–634 (2002). source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataMost TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity except for one fall that was deemed unrelated to treatment.
“Most were mild or moderate in severity except for one fall that was deemed to be unrelated to treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataNMSS scores varied across domains.
“The NMSS scores varied across domains, with total scores trending towards stability in the high-dose cohort (Extended Data Table 9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe trial achieved its primary safety and tolerability objectives and predefined safety criteria at 12 months after transplantation.
“The trial achieved its primary objectives of safety and tolerability one year after transplantation, with no adverse events related to the cell product.”
- Also stated in: § Safety and tolerability · plain
“Predefined safety criteria for the primary outcome were satisfied at 12 months of follow-up after transplantation (Table 1).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“bilateral putaminal transplantation of bemdaneprocel, a hES cell-derived DA neuron progenitor cell product, was generally well tolerated and achieved predefined safety criteria at 12 months as a primary end point.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Safety and tolerability · plain
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataMRI imaging by 18 months did not show evidence of tumours or changes in the putaminal volume.
“MRI imaging by 18 months did not show evidence of tumours or changes in the putaminal volume.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThere were no tumours, abnormal tissue overgrowth or intracerebral haemorrhages detected with MRI.
“There were no deaths, no SAEs related to transplanted cells or immunosuppression, and there were no tumours, abnormal tissue overgrowth or intracerebral haemorrhages detected with MRI, which showed the expected postoperative changes (Extended Data Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe clinical data show a greater amplitude of changes in UPDRS motor scores and reduction in OFF times, and an earlier onset of improvement, in the high-dose group.
“The clinical data also show a greater amplitude of changes in UPDRS motor scores and reduction in OFF times, and an earlier onset of improvement, in the high-dose group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenTransplant feasibility was achieved, with intraoperative delivery of the total number of all intended cell deposits in all participants.
“Transplant feasibility was achieved, with intraoperative delivery of the total number of all intended cell deposits in all of the participants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThere were no SAEs related to transplanted cells or immunosuppression.
“There were no deaths, no SAEs related to transplanted cells or immunosuppression, and there were no tumours, abnormal tissue overgrowth or intracerebral haemorrhages detected with MRI, which showed the expected postoperative changes (Extended Data Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAside from two severe TEAEs (one fall deemed unrelated to treatment and the SAE of gastrointestinal haemorrhage), all other TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity.
“Aside from two severe TEAEs (one fall deemed unrelated to treatment and the aforementioned SAE of gastrointestinal haemorrhage), all others were mild or moderate in severity”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataParticipants had a median age of 67.0 years (Q1, Q3: 64.5, 70.0); 67% were white and 75% were male.
“The participants had a median age of 67.0 years (quartile 1 (Q1), Q3: 64.5, 70.0); 67% were white and 75% were male”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataMedian time since diagnosis was 9.0 (Q1, Q3: 5.9, 11.5) years.
“The median (Q1, Q3) time since diagnosis was 9.0 (5.9, 11.5) years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe most frequent TEAEs were in nervous system disorders (11 TEAEs in eight participants) and infections and infestations (10 TEAEs in seven participants).
“TEAEs most frequently experienced by participants (Extended Data Table 6) were in the nervous system disorders (11 TEAEs in eight participants; Extended Data Table 7) and infections and infestations (10 TEAEs in seven participants; Extended Data Table 8) system/organ classes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAt baseline, all participants had a Hoehn-Yahr ON score of 2; 11 had an OFF score of 3 and one had an OFF score of 2.
“At the baseline, all of the participants had a Hoehn–Yahr ON score of 2; 11 participants had a Hoehn–Yahr OFF score of 3 and one participant (low-dose cohort; Canada) had a score of 2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationFetal grafting studies showed evidence of Lewy body formation within the graft; such disease transmission occurred only in later stages (more than a decade) after transplantation and affected only a minority of grafted DA neurons.
“Fetal grafting studies showed evidence of Lewy body formation within the graft; however, such disease transmission occurred only in later stages (more than a decade) after transplantation and affected only a minority of grafted DA neurons43,44.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [43] Li, J. Y. et al. Lewy bodies in grafted neurons in subjects with Parkinson’s disease suggest host-to-graft disease propagation. Nat. Med. 14, 501–503 (2008). source
- cites [44] Kordower, J. H., Chu, Y., Hauser, R. A., Freeman, T. B. & Olanow, C. W. Lewy body-like pathology in long-term embryonic nigral transplants in Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Med. 14, 504–506 (2008). source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThe MDS-UPDRS scale is the most widely used PD scale; it is well validated with high inter-rater reliability, and is sensitive to clinical changes.
“This scale was selected as an outcome measure as it is the most widely used PD scale; it is well validated with high inter-rater reliability, and is sensitive to clinical changes40.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] Martinez–Martin, P., Rodriguez-Blazquez, C. & Forjaz, M. J. in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology 8–16 (Elsevier, 2017).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenEnrolment occurred sequentially, first into the low-dose cohort, then into the high-dose cohort after a 30-day pause for evaluation by the data safety monitoring committee.
“Enrolment occurred sequentially, first into the low-dose cohort, then into the high-dose cohort after a 30-day pause for evaluation by the data safety monitoring committee.”
- Also stated in: § Study design and participants · plain
“Enrolment occurred sequentially, first into the low-dose cohort, then into the high-dose cohort after a 30-day pause for evaluation by the data safety monitoring committee.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Study design and participants · plain
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone given18F-DOPA PET studies and analysis were performed at a single imaging site by investigators blinded to clinical and dose information.
“18F-DOPA PET studies and analysis were performed at a single imaging site by investigators blinded to clinical and dose information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe open-label study design, small patient cohort, relatively short observation period, expected fluctuations in PD symptoms and possibility of placebo effects warrant cautious interpretation of the efficacy data.
“However, these data need to be interpreted cautiously in view of the open-label study design, the small patient cohort, the relatively short observation period, the expected fluctuations in PD symptoms and the possibility of placebo effects, which can be substantial in studies of PD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Placebo effects can be substantial in studies of PD.
- Rests on an assumption: PD symptoms fluctuate expectedly.
Probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataThe paper's data support moving towards larger definitive clinical studies.
“Taken together, our data support moving towards larger definitive clinical studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataOur results suggest that the dosing and duration of immunosuppression were sufficient, well-tolerated and protected cell survival and function.
“Our results suggest that the dosing and duration of immunosuppression were sufficient, well-tolerated and protected cell survival and function; longer-term follow-up data will be critical to confirm these findings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisenone givenConsistently manufacturing and releasing an autologous product poses new challenges.
“consistently manufacturing and releasing an autologous product poses new challenges”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenAll safety data from all participants were used to conduct the formal analysis of the primary end point at 1 year after transplantation.
“All safety data from all of the participants were used to conduct the formal analysis of the primary end point at 1 year after transplantation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenThe phase I study was not designed nor powered for determining efficacy.
“Although this phase I study is not designed nor powered for determining efficacy, there is nonetheless a possibility of improvement in the key secondary outcomes, including the MDS-UPDRS OFF motor scores, reflecting improved motor function without the benefit of anti-Parkinsonian medication.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductown dataThe study was small and unblinded.
“our findings should be interpreted carefully within the context of a small and unblinded safety and tolerability study”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenThe cells were manufactured under cGMP conditions to establish working cell banks that were certified by Waisman Biomanufacturing.
“The cells were manufactured under cGMP conditions to establish working cell banks that were further certified by Waisman Biomanufacturing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
Study design and conductnone givenPET data should be interpreted cautiously owing to limitations in resolution, signal-to-noise ratio and variability across and within patients as well as between the low- and high-dose cohorts.
“However, PET data should be interpreted cautiously owing to limitations in the resolution, signal-to-noise ratio and variability across and within patients as well as between the low- and high-dose cohorts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The correlation between 18F-DOPA PET uptake and clinical performance can be variable.
- Rests on an assumption: Graft survival alone is not sufficient to predict long-term patient benefit.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductown dataBetween 3 May 2021 and 30 March 2022, 17 participants were assessed for eligibility and five were excluded due to screening failure.
“Between 3 May 2021 and 30 March 2022, 17 participants were assessed for eligibility; five were excluded due to screening failure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductown dataAll participants signed the informed consent.
“All of the participants signed the informed consent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenThe trial was conducted in accordance with the protocol and all applicable local government laws, regulations and guidance, including the Declaration of Helsinki and ICH requirements.
“The trial was conducted in accordance with the protocol and all applicable local government laws, regulations and guidance, including policies with foundations in the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductown dataInferential statistical testing was not performed due to the small number of participants.
“Inferential statistical testing was not performed due to the small number of participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductown dataThe remaining 12 participants were sequentially enrolled into the low-dose (n = 5) or high-dose (n = 7) cohort.
“The remaining 12 participants were sequentially enrolled into the low-dose (n = 5) or high-dose (n = 7) cohort”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenA data safety monitoring committee and the institutional review boards monitored trial progression and data handling.
“A data safety monitoring committee and the institutional review boards monitored trial progression and data handling.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductown dataThe Tri-institutional Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research Oversight committee at MSKCC and WCM approved the study and the consent.
“The Tri-institutional Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research Oversight committee (ESCRO) at MSKCC and WCM approved the study and the consent on 11 October 2019.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductown dataAn institutional review board at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medicine reviewed and approved the clinical protocol and the patient consent form.
“An institutional review board at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medicine reviewed and approved the clinical protocol (submitted with the Article) and the patient consent form.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductown dataAt the time of the last participant completing the 18-month visit, median follow-up was 21.2 months (18.5, 24.7) and all participants were still engaged in clinical follow-up.
“At the time of the last participant completing the 18-month visit, the median (min, max) follow-up time was 21.2 months (18.5, 24.7) and all of the participants were still engaged in clinical follow-up.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The correlation between 18F-DOPA PET uptake and clinical performance can be variable.
“Furthermore, the correlation between 18F-DOPA PET uptake and clinical performance can be variable, and graft survival alone is not sufficient to predict long-term patient benefit.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Graft survival alone is not sufficient to predict long-term patient benefit.
“Furthermore, the correlation between 18F-DOPA PET uptake and clinical performance can be variable, and graft survival alone is not sufficient to predict long-term patient benefit.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Placebo effects can be substantial in studies of PD.
“the possibility of placebo effects, which can be substantial in studies of PD.”
The paper relies on this without support.
PD symptoms fluctuate expectedly.
“the expected fluctuations in PD symptoms”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conflicting counts of severe adverse events
MinorThe results describe only one adverse event outside the mild-or-moderate range, but the Methods identify two severe adverse events: a fall and gastrointestinal haemorrhage.
“Most were mild or moderate in severity except for one fall that was deemed to be unrelated to treatment.”
“Aside from two severe TEAEs (one fall deemed unrelated to treatment and the aforementioned SAE of gastrointestinal haemorrhage), all others were mild or moderate in severity (Extended Data Table 4).”
Citations
Cites
Poewe, W., Seppi, K., Tanner, C. M., Halliday, G. M., Brundin, P., Volkmann, J., Schrag, A.-E., & Lang, A. E. (2017) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.13 · Cited by 5,415
Diagnosis and Treatment of Parkinson Disease: A Review
Armstrong, M. J., & Okun, M. S. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.22360 · Cited by 2,924
Transplantation of Embryonic Dopamine Neurons for Severe Parkinson's Disease
Freed, C. R., Greene, P. E., Breeze, R. E., Tsai, W.-Y., DuMouchel, W., Kao, R., Dillon, S., Winfield, H., Culver, S., Trojanowski, J. Q., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200103083441002 · Cited by 2,366
Self-citationA Bayesian model of shape and appearance for subcortical brain segmentation
Patenaude, B., Smith, S. M., Kennedy, D. N., & Jenkinson, M. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.046 · Cited by 2,287
Kriks, S., Shim, J., Piao, J., Ganat, Y. M., Wakeman, D. R., Xie, Z., Carrillo‐Reid, L., Auyeung, G., Antonacci, C. L., Buch, A., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10648 · Cited by 1,951
Self-citationLi, J.-Y., Englund, E., Holton, J. L., Soulet, D., Hagell, P., Lees, A. J., Lashley, T., Quinn, N. P., Rehncrona, S., Björklund, A., et al. (2008) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1746 · Cited by 1,845
Lewy body–like pathology in long-term embryonic nigral transplants in Parkinson's disease
Kordower, J. H., Chu, Y., Hauser, R. A., Freeman, T. B., & Olanow, C. W. (2008) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1747 · Cited by 1,722
Goetz, C. G., Fahn, S., Martínez‐Martín, P., Poewe, W. H., Sampaio, C., Stebbins, G. T., Stern, M. B., Tilley, B. C., Dodel, R. C., Dubois, B., et al. (2006) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.21198 · Cited by 1,443
A double‐blind controlled trial of bilateral fetal nigral transplantation in Parkinson's disease
Olanow, C. W., Goetz, C. G., Kordower, J. H., Stoessl, A. J., Sossi, V., Brin, M. F., Shannon, K. M., Nauert, G. M., Perl, D. P., Godbold, J., et al. (2003) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.10720 · Cited by 1,307
The Parkinson Pandemic—A Call to Action
Dorsey, E. R., & Bloem, B. R. (2017) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3299 · Cited by 1,145
The pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease
Morris, H. R., Spillantini, M. G., Sue, C. M., & Williams‐Gray, C. H. (2024) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01478-2 · Cited by 1,133
Freed, C. R., Breeze, R. E., Rosenberg, N. L., Schneck, S. A., Kriek, E., Qi, J.-X., Lone, T., Zhang, Y.-B., Snyder, J. A., Wells, T. H., et al. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199211263272202 · Cited by 734
Personalized iPSC-Derived Dopamine Progenitor Cells for Parkinson’s Disease
Schweitzer, J. S., Song, B., Herrington, T. M., Park, T.-Y., Lee, N., Ko, S., Jeon, J., Cha, Y., Kim, K., Li, Q., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1915872 · Cited by 542
Self-citationThe Clinically Important Difference on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale
Shulman, L. M., Gruber-Baldini, A. L., Anderson, K. E., Fishman, P. S., Reich, S. G., & Weiner, W. J. (2010) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2009.295 · Cited by 494
Lindvall, O., Sawle, G. V., Widner, H., Rothwell, J. C., Björklund, A., Brooks, D. J., Brundin, P., Frackowiak, R. S. J., MARSDEN, C. D., Odin, P., et al. (1994) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410350208 · Cited by 448
Trial of Prasinezumab in Early-Stage Parkinson’s Disease
Pagano, G., Taylor, K. I., Anzures‐Cabrera, J., Marchesi, M., Simuni, T., MAREK, K. L., Postuma, R. B., Pavese, N., Stocchi, F., Azulay, J., et al. (2022) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2202867 · Cited by 439
Bond, A. E., Shah, B., Huss, D., Dallapiazza, R. F., Warren, A., Harrison, M. B., Sperling, S. A., Wang, X.-Q., Gwinn, R. P., Witt, J., et al. (2017) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3098 · Cited by 391
Trial of Lixisenatide in Early Parkinson’s Disease
Meissner, W. G., Remy, P., Giordana, C., Maltête, D., Derkinderen, P., Houéto, J.-L., Anheim, M., Benatru, I., Boraud, T., Brefel-Courbon, C., et al. (2024) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2312323 · Cited by 369
Wenning, G. K., Odin, P., Morrish, P., Rehncrona, S., Widner, H., Brundin, P., Rothwell, J. C., Brown, R. G., Gustavii, B., Hagell, P., et al. (1997) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410420115 · Cited by 368
Trial of Cinpanemab in Early Parkinson’s Disease
Lang, A. E., Siderowf, A. D., Macklin, E. A., Poewe, W. H., Brooks, D. J., Fernandez, H. H., Rascol, O., Giladi, N., Stocchi, F., Tanner, C. M., et al. (2022) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2203395 · Cited by 362
Neuberger, J., Bechstein, W. O., Kuypers, D. R. J., Burra, P., Citterio, F., Geest, S. D., Duvoux, C., Jardine, A. G., Kamar, N., Krämer, B. K., et al. (2017) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/tp.0000000000001651 · Cited by 327
Henderson, E. J., Lord, S. R., Brodie, M. A. D., Gaunt, D., Lawrence, A. D., Close, J., Whone, A. L., & Ben‐Shlomo, Y. (2016) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00389-0 · Cited by 320
Long-term Clinical Outcome of Fetal Cell Transplantation for Parkinson Disease
Kefalopoulou, Z. M., Politis, M., Piccini, P. P., Mencacci, N. E., Bhatia, K. P., Jahanshahi, M., Widner, H., Rehncrona, S., Brundin, P., Björklund, A., et al. (2013) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.4749 · Cited by 316
Li, W., Englund, E., Widner, H., Mattsson, B., van Westen, D., Lätt, J., Rehncrona, S., Brundin, P., Björklund, A., Lindvall, O., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1605245113 · Cited by 313
Steinbeck, J. A., Choi, S. J., Mrejeru, A., Ganat, Y. M., Deisseroth, K. A., Sulzer, D., Mosharov, E. V., & Studer, L. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3124 · Cited by 304
Self-citationBrundin, P. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.7.1380 · Cited by 303
Hauser, R. A., Friedlander, J., Zesiewicz, T., Adler, C. H., Seeberger, L., O’Brien, C. F., Molho, E., & Factor, S. A. (2000) · Clinical Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1097/00002826-200003000-00003 · Cited by 302
Peschanski, M., Defer, G. L., Nguyen, J., Ricolfi, F., Monfort, J.-C., Rémy, P., Gény, C., Samson, Y., Hantraye, P., Jeny, R., et al. (1994) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/117.3.487 · Cited by 282
Sequential bilateral transplantation in Parkinson's disease: Effects of the second graft
Hagell, P. (1999) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/122.6.1121 · Cited by 274
Effects of a central cholinesterase inhibitor on reducing falls in Parkinson disease
Chung, K. A., Lobb, B. M., Nutt, J. G., & Horak, F. B. (2010) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181f6128c · Cited by 258
Piao, J., Zabierowski, S., Dubose, B. N., Hill, E. J., Navare, M., Claros, N., Rosen, S., Ramnarine, K., Horn, C., Fredrickson, C., et al. (2021) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2021.01.004 · Cited by 240
Self-citationDyskinesia after fetal cell transplantation for parkinsonism: A PET study
Ma, Y., Feigin, A., Dhawan, V., Fukuda, M., Shi, Q., Greene, P., Breeze, R., Fahn, S., Freed, C., & Eidelberg, D. (2002) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.10359 · Cited by 219
Self-citationDesigning stem-cell-based dopamine cell replacement trials for Parkinson’s disease
TRANSEURO consortium, & Barker, R. A. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0507-2 · Cited by 219
Kim, T. W., Piao, J., Koo, S. Y., Kriks, S., Chung, S. Y., Betel, D., Socci, N. D., Choi, S. J., Zabierowski, S., Dubose, B. N., et al. (2021) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2021.01.005 · Cited by 210
Self-citationInitiation of pharmacological therapy in Parkinson's disease: when, why, and how
de Bie, R. M. A., Clarke, C. E., Espay, A. J., Fox, S. H., & Lang, A. E. (2020) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30036-3 · Cited by 200
Dopamine Cell Implantation in Parkinson's Disease: Long-Term Clinical and 18F-FDOPA PET Outcomes
Ma, Y., Tang, C., Chaly, T., Greene, P., Breeze, R., Fahn, S., Freed, C., Dhawan, V., & Eidelberg, D. (2010) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.109.066811 · Cited by 185
Self-citationCell Survival and Clinical Outcome Following Intrastriatal Transplantation in Parkinson Disease
Hagell, P., & Brundin, P. (2001) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1093/jnen/60.8.741 · Cited by 174
Morphometry of the human substantia nigra in ageing and Parkinson’s disease
Rudow, G., O’Brien, R., Savonenko, A. V., Resnick, S. M., Zonderman, A. B., Pletnikova, O., Marsh, L., Dawson, T. M., Crain, B. J., West, M. J., et al. (2008) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-008-0352-8 · Cited by 171
Trial of Globus Pallidus Focused Ultrasound Ablation in Parkinson’s Disease
Krishna, V., Fishman, P. S., Eisenberg, H. M., Kaplitt, M. G., Baltuch, G. H., Chang, J. W., Chang, W., Martínez‐Fernández, R., del Álamo, M., Halpern, C. H., et al. (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2202721 · Cited by 171
Self-citationLong-Term Health of Dopaminergic Neuron Transplants in Parkinson's Disease Patients
Hallett, P. J., Cooper, O., Sadi, D., Robertson, H. A., Mendez, I. M., & Ole Isacson, A. (2014) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.05.027 · Cited by 159
Kirkeby, A., Nelander, J., Hoban, D. B., Rogelius, N., Bjartmarz, H., Storm, P., Fiorenzano, A., Adler, A. F., Vale, S., Mudannayake, J., et al. (2023) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2023.08.014 · Cited by 158
Politis, M., Wu, K., Loane, C., Quinn, N. P., Brooks, D. J., Oertel, W. H., Björklund, A., Lindvall, O., & Piccini, P. P. (2012) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3003391 · Cited by 132
Gene Therapy for Parkinson’s Disease Associated with GBA1 Mutations
Abeliovich, A., Hefti, F. F., & Sevigny, J. (2021) · Journal of Parkinson s Disease · doi:10.3233/jpd-212739 · Cited by 82
Jokinen, P., Helenius, H., Rauhala, E., Brück, A., Eskola, O., & Rinne, J. O. (2009) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.108.061572 · Cited by 72
Blinded positron emission tomography study of dopamine cell implantation for Parkinson's disease
Nakamura, T., Dhawan, V., Chaly, T., Fukuda, M., Ma, Y., Breeze, R., Greene, P., Fahn, S., Freed, C., & Eidelberg, D. (2001) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.1075 · Cited by 67
Self-citationAn Update on Gene Therapy Approaches for Parkinson’s Disease: Restoration of Dopaminergic Function
Laar, A. D. V., Laar, V. S. V., Sebastián, W. S., Merola, A., Elder, J. B., Lonser, R. R., & Bankiewicz, K. S. (2021) · Journal of Parkinson s Disease · doi:10.3233/jpd-212724 · Cited by 48
Heimrich, K. G., Schönenberg, A., Santos‐García, D., Mir, P., COPPADIS Study Group, & Prell, T. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12072573 · Cited by 43
Nelson, J. E., Alvey, N., Bowman, L. J., Schulte, J., Segovia, M. C., McDermott, J. K., Te, H. S., Kapila, N., Levine, D. J., Gottlieb, R., et al. (2022) · Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · doi:10.1002/phar.2718 · Cited by 37
Kremer, N. I., van Laar, T., Lange, S. F., Muller, S. S., Gemert, S. L. B., Oterdoom, D. L. M., Drost, G., & van Dijk, J. M. C. (2022) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2022-329192 · Cited by 34
GLP-1, Parkinson’s Disease, and Neuroprotection
Standaert, D. G. (2024) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejme2401743 · Cited by 26
(2002) · PubMed
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Martinez–Martin, P., Rodriguez-Blazquez, C. & Forjaz, M. J. in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology 8–16 (Elsevier, 2017).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Epigenetic Regulation of Aging and its Rejuvenation
An, Y., Wang, Q., Gao, K., Zhang, C., Ouyang, Y., Li, R., Zhou, M., Wu, T., Zhou, L., Xie, Z., et al. (2025) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.70369 · Cited by 48
Current therapeutic strategies in Parkinson’s disease: Future perspectives
Kim, T. Y., & Lee, B. D. (2025) · Molecules and Cells · doi:10.1016/j.mocell.2025.100274 · Cited by 48
Phase 1/2a clinical trial of hESC-derived dopamine progenitors in Parkinson’s disease
Chang, J. W., Na, H. K., Chang, K. W., Park, C. W., Kim, D., Park, C., Park, C.-Y., Eom, J. H., Nam, S. T., Jo, K.-S., et al. (2025) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.09.010 · Cited by 40
New approach methodologies for drug discovery
Liu, W., Pang, P. D., Wu, C. A., Tagle, D. A., & Wu, J. C. (2026) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2026.02.012 · Cited by 38
Reimagining human-centric drug development with new approach methodologies
Wu, X., Wu, M. A., Zou, J., Kleinstreuer, N., & Wu, J. C. (2026) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aeb0045 · Cited by 37
The mist of ferroptosis: The Orpheus journey of mitochondria - Exploring the symphony of cell fate
Jiang, Y., Liu, X., & Sun, M. (2025) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.145472 · Cited by 27
Regensburger, M., Csóti, I., Jost, W. H., Kohl, Z., Lorenzl, S., Pedrosa, D. J., & Lingor, P. (2025) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-025-02990-4 · Cited by 23
The evolution of microglia replacement: A new paradigm for CNS disease therapy
Rao, Y., Bai, Y., Li, X., Du, B., & Peng, B. (2025) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2025.10.014 · Cited by 23
Elvira, R., Tan, E., & Zhou, Z. (2025) · Stem Cell Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13287-025-04660-4 · Cited by 17
Two decades of induced pluripotent stem cell research: From discovery to diverse applications
Yamanaka, S. (2026) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2026.02.003 · Cited by 17
Shi, M., Chu, F., & Zhu, J. (2025) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2025.107960 · Cited by 15
Clinical translational research on stem cell products: prospects and challenges
Chen, S., ZHANG, L., Ren, Y., Bai, X., Wei, X., Chai, M., 崔苏甦, Zhao, X., & Deng, H. (2026) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-026-02582-y · Cited by 14
Khodve, G., Banerjee, S., Kumari, M., Ravichandiran, V., Banerjee, S., & Roy, S. (2025) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-025-07266-9 · Cited by 12
Morizane, A., Yamasaki, E., Shindo, T., Anazawa, T., Sawamoto, N., Shima, A., Yamakado, H., Nakanishi, E., Sawamura, M., Taruno, Y., et al. (2025) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2025.07.012 · Cited by 11
Kim, T., Piao, J., Bocchi, V. D., Koo, S. Y., Choi, S. J., Chaudhry, F. F., Yang, D., Cho, H., Hergenreder, E., Perera, L. R., et al. (2026) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci190954 · Cited by 10
Self-citationClinical trials test the safety of stem-cell therapy for Parkinson’s disease
Okano, H. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-025-00688-x · Cited by 9
Ortega-Gascó, A., Percopo, F., Font-Guixe, A., Ramos-Bartolome, S., Cami-Bonet, A., Magem-Planas, M., Fabrellas-Monsech, M., Esquirol-Albala, E., Goulet, L., Fornos-Zapater, S., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26157262 · Cited by 9
Paul, G., Bjartmarz, H., Kirkeby, A., Nelander, J., Smith, R. A., Kayhanian, S., Evans, A. L., Bulstrode, H. J. C. J., Cutting, E., Fazal, S. V., et al. (2026) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-026-04525-0 · Cited by 8
DHAWAN, V. M., Peng, S., Spetsieris, P. G., Eidelberg, D., & Ma, Y. (2025) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.30231 · Cited by 7
Self-citationCSF1R inhibitor-resistant model for CNS-wide microglia replacement strategies
Chadarevian, J. P., Nguyen, J., Le, L., Ayala, L. A., Chadarevian, A. L., Zhou, C., Escobar, A., Abby, T., Deynega, E., Mansour, K., et al. (2025) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.10.051 · Cited by 7
Human stem cell-based embryo models: innovation, ethics, and policy
Arias, A. M., Rivron, N. C., Tajbakhsh, S., Johnston, J., Alev, C., Bally‐Cuif, L., Böke, E., Cavazza, T., Cave, E., Cyranoski, D., et al. (2026) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deag035 · Cited by 6
Parkinson’s disease: genetics and neuroinflammatory insights
Chandel, I., Kumari, S., Bagri, K., Bhatia, A., & Deshmukh, R. R. (2025) · Inflammopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s10787-025-01832-9 · Cited by 6
Fogliano, C. A., Rigon, L., Chaudhuri, К. R., Popławska-Domaszewicz, K., Falup‐Pecurariu, C., Murășan, I., Guerra, A., Garon, M., Odin, P., Hattori, N., et al. (2025) · Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery · doi:10.1080/17425247.2025.2539962 · Cited by 6
Stem cell-derived dopamine cell therapies for Parkinson’s disease: what have the first trials shown?
Barker, R. A., & Parmar, M. (2025) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awaf322 · Cited by 6
Japan’s big bet on stem-cell therapies might soon pay off with medical breakthroughs
Mallapaty, S. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-025-01143-7 · Cited by 6
Cha, Y., Leblanc, P. R., & Kim, K. (2025) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2025.05.005 · Cited by 5
Wu, K., Zhang, Y., Wang, T., Wu, J., Huang, Y., Yuan, P., & Yu, J. (2025) · The Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2025.101112 · Cited by 5
Puspita, L., Deline, M., & Shim, J. (2025) · Molecules and Cells · doi:10.1016/j.mocell.2025.100284 · Cited by 5
Drug discovery and development for Parkinson’s disease: are preclinical models good enough?
Reinares-Sebastián, A., Esteban-García, N., Takada, M., & Trigo‐Damas, I. (2025) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2025.1692592 · Cited by 5
Therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells in neurodegenerative diseases
Cui, C.-X., Shao, X.-N., Li, Y., Qiao, L., Lin, J., & Guan, L. (2025) · World Journal of Stem Cells · doi:10.4252/wjsc.v17.i8.107717 · Cited by 5
Stem cell therapies advance in Parkinson’s disease and beyond
Healey, N. (2025) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/d41591-025-00036-6 · Cited by 5
Redefining dopaminergic synapses beyond the classical paradigm
Fujise, K., Mishra, J., Karmali, N., & Rafiq, N. M. (2025) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2025.09.011 · Cited by 4
The Evolving Landscape of Stem Cell Therapies for Huntington’s Disease
Estarellas, M., Gomis, C., & Canals, J. M. (2025) · Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40291-025-00816-3 · Cited by 4
Evola, V., & Parmar, M. S. (2026) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/14737175.2026.2647033 · Cited by 4
Guo, Y., Dong, X., Liu, M., Liu, D., & Wang, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2026.1763855 · Cited by 4
Bocchi, V. D., To, K., Weber, L., Zumbo, P., Kim, L., Shida, I. Y., Yang, D., Storm, P., Fiorenzano, A., Sozzi, E., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.06.19.733041 · Cited by 4
Self-citationJonny, J., Larasati, A. D., Sunjaya, Q. A., & Faried, A. (2025) · Chinese Neurosurgical Journal · doi:10.1186/s41016-025-00415-5 · Cited by 3
Paul, G., Bjartmarz, H., Björklund, A., Cutting, E., Evans, A. E., Harry, B., Hansson, O., Kayhanian, S., Kirkeby, A., Lao–Kaim, N. P., et al. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107597 · Cited by 3
Neural Hearing Loss: Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Treatment Horizons
Genitsaridi, E., Papoutselou, E., Campbell-Bell, C. M., Abbas, L., Haines, R., Hartley, D. E. H., & Rivolta, M. N. (2026) · Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology · doi:10.1007/s10162-026-01036-0 · Cited by 3
Wu, Y., Sun, Y., Chen, J., Hu, M., Zhang, X., Xiong, X., Yu, Z., Yang, X., Li, H., & Wang, Y. (2026) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.056 · Cited by 3
Temporal Interference Stimulation Enhances Neural Regeneration
Peressotti, S., Garrido, M. G., Dzialecka, P., Law, R. M. H., Lara, R. P., Geary, B., Faillace, E., Aslie, S. M.-N., Wojewska, M. J., Otero‐Jimenez, M., et al. (2026) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202524341 · Cited by 3
Parkinson’s disease: exploring the systemic immune mechanisms through molecular investigations
Mohan, M., Mannan, A., & Singh, T. G. (2025) · Inflammopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s10787-025-01816-9 · Cited by 3
Curle, A. J., Fazal, S. V., Qarin, S., Howlett, S. K., He, X., Stamper, A., Pisupati, V., Barker, R. A., & Jones, J. (2026) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2026.102818 · Cited by 3
Infusion therapies for Parkinson’s disease: where are we in 2025?
Rigon, L., Fogliano, C. A., Odin, P., & Antonini, A. (2025) · Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery · doi:10.1080/17425247.2025.2577710 · Cited by 3
Mechanical Forces Guide Axon Growth through the Nigrostriatal Pathway in an Organotypic Model
Vincentiis, S. D., Capitanini, E., Kira, K., Dell’Amico, C., Takahashi, J., Onorati, M., Raudzus, F., & Raffa, V. (2025) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202500400 · Cited by 2
The Impact of Glutamatergic Excitotoxicity on the Differentiation of Cerebellar Neural Stem Cells
Egor, G., Andrey, S., Elena, K., Olga, B., Elena, T., & Anton, S. (2025) · Journal of Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s12031-025-02426-4 · Cited by 2
Advancements in differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells into specialized neuronal subtypes
Setsu, S., Okano, H., & Morimoto, S. (2025) · Neural Regeneration Research · doi:10.4103/nrr.nrr-d-25-00630 · Cited by 2
Dynamic redox monitoring in differentiated human neuroblastoma models of Parkinson’s disease
Lim, J., Zhou, X., Pamujula, S., Liaqat, R., Achanta, A. S., Looger, L. L., Campbell, B. C., & Campbell, M. M. (2025) · Redox Report · doi:10.1080/13510002.2025.2595781 · Cited by 2
Advanced Therapeutics in Parkinson’s Disease: What’s New?
Monje, M. H. G., Karl, J. A., Cooper, C. S., Yomtoob, J., Deliz, J. R., Morse, L. A., Shetty, N., & Metman, L. V. (2026) · Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports · doi:10.1007/s11910-026-01483-5 · Cited by 2
Human pluripotent stem cell engineering with CRISPR–Cas9 for Parkinson’s disease
Park, S. B., Kim, J., Ha, Y., Kim, M. S., & Kim, T. W. (2026) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-026-01679-2 · Cited by 2
Thymus regeneration therapies: entering a new era
Kreins, A. Y., & Weinacht, K. G. (2026) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2026.03.005 · Cited by 2
DYRK1A and Parkinson’s disease, facts and hypotheses
Meijer, L., Lindberg, M. F., Hogrel, G., & Khor, B. (2026) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2026.107379 · Cited by 2
Ji, L., Huang, Z., Gu, S., Lyu, L., & Zhang, Z. (2026) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.75476 · Cited by 2
Parkinson's disease drug therapies in the clinical trial pipeline: 2015–2024
Buff, S., Pilcicka, A., Pitzer, K., Fiske, B. K., Stott, S., & McFarthing, K. (2026) · Journal of Parkinson s Disease · doi:10.1177/1877718x261454154 · Cited by 2
Clay, K. B., Medlock-Lanier, T., GRIMES, R. N., Oke, O. O., Hudson, B. T., Wilson, M. M., Filipov, N. M., & Roberts-Galbraith, R. H. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-76397-4 · Cited by 2
Schörling, A. L., Salvador, A., Rifes, P., Hänninen, E., Nygaard, A. H., Rathore, G. S., Nelander, J., Christiansen, J. R., Jensen, S. M., Niclis, J. C., et al. (2026) · npj Parkinson s Disease · doi:10.1038/s41531-026-01467-9 · Cited by 2
Don’t rush promising stem-cell therapies
(2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-025-01176-y · Cited by 2
Ogawa, M., Liu, J. C., Dadvar, A., Tian, B., Zhao, X., Fernandes, I., Minegishi, K., Takase, K., Cui, C., Hernandez, M., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.06.13.659636 · Cited by 2
The diploid reference genome of a human embryonic stem cell linePreprint
Pačar, I., Ungaro, M. T., Chen, Y., Dallali, H., Medico, J. A., Hebbar, P., Diekhans, M., Tommaso, E. D., Geleta, M., Chan, P. P., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.03.26.714432 · Cited by 2
General Overview of Parkinson’s Disease
Long, E., & Reuther, W. R. (2025) · Advances in Parkinson s Disease · doi:10.4236/apd.2025.144004 · Cited by 1
Shi, C.-Y., Liang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Kushwaha, A., Kumar, A., Wang, J., Ouyang, Q., & Huang, Y. (2025) · Materials Today Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.mtchem.2025.103314 · Cited by 1
Chen, N., Wang, S., Liu, J., Zheng, X., & Shang, H. (2026) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-026-04154-2 · Cited by 1
Safeguarding genomic integrity in pluripotent stem-cell therapies
Kong, S. W., Lee, I., Cha, Y., Carter, B., & Kim, K.-S. (2026) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(26)00095-4 · Cited by 1
Quo Vadis translational neuroscience?
Dere, E. (2026) · Translational Neuroscience · doi:10.1515/tnsci-2025-0393 · Cited by 1
Update neue Parkinson-Therapien
Bingöl, D., & Pedrosa, D. J. (2026) · Neurologie up2date · doi:10.1055/a-2462-7066 · Cited by 1
Chouhan, D., Browne, K. D., Gordián‐Vélez, W. J., Karandikar, S. P., Patel, R., Yankson, K. N. A., Shultz, R. B., Duda, J. E., & Cullen, D. K. (2026) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2026.03.031 · Cited by 1
Wang, X. C., Li, S., Xiang, X., Zhang, X., Yu, C., Qing, D., Law, B. Y.-K., & Tang, Y. (2026) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2026.03.034 · Cited by 1
Lao, Z.-K., & Xu, N. (2026) · Translational Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s40035-026-00546-4 · Cited by 1
Advances in Cell Therapy for Neural Repair
Zholudeva, L. V., Svendsen, S. P., Llorente, I. L., Kan, V. W. Y., Tsai, E. C., Ogbolu, V. C., Liang, Q., Wirth, E. D., Paladini, C. A., Svendsen, C. N., et al. (2026) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1675-25.2026 · Cited by 1
A Systematic Review on Disease‐Modifying Therapies in Parkinsonian Disorders
Eijsvogel, P. P. N. M., Smits, L. M. G., Kremer, P. H. C., & Groeneveld, G. J. (2026) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt.70315 · Cited by 1
Structure Variations and 3D Genome Disruption: Implications in Safety of hPSC-Based Cell Therapy
Li, M., Cui, F., Na, T., Ma, Q., Guo, M., Guo, M., Zhang, K., & Meng, S. (2026) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms27104573 · Cited by 1
Zheng, H., Xu, G., Yao, H., Guan, A., Ma, R., Zhang, W., Zheng, L., Zhao, Y., & Wang, G. (2026) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2026.178221 · Cited by 1
Groppa, S., Fasano, A. A., Urso, D., Yang, X., Popescu, B. O., Klivènyi, P., van Laar, T., Jost, W., Ruiz, P., Bhidayasiri, R., et al. (2026) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-026-03208-x · Cited by 1
Self-citationStem Cell Therapy: Past, Present, and Future Aspects
Alim, E., Greenwell, A., Hess, R., Blanco, N., Torres, J. H., & Şahiner, N. (2026) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines14071443 · Cited by 1
Nakanishi, E., Yamakado, H., Sawamoto, N., Takahashi, J., & Takahashi, R. (2026) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.70500 · Cited by 1
Bach, D., & Nguyen, T. L. (2026) · Cell Communication and Signaling · doi:10.1186/s12964-026-03089-3 · Cited by 1
Park, C. W., Park, S., Chung, S. J., Lee, P. H., & Kim, D. (2026) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2026.07.002 · Cited by 1
Face off: Stem cell therapy versus the immune system
Castro-Gutiérrez, R., & Tang, Q. (2025) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2025.08.009 · Cited by 1
‘Big leap’ for Parkinson’s treatment: symptoms improve in stem-cell trials
Mallapaty, S. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-025-01208-7 · Cited by 1
García‐Swinburn, R., Lyu, G., Kreutzmann, J. C., Xiong, A., Kojima, R., Abaurre, C., Tremolanti, C., Gellhaar, S., Uhlén, P., Svenningsson, P., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.06.18.660098 · Cited by 1
Sozzi, E., Garrote, M. G., Mudannayake, J. M., Passarello, G. R., Bruzelius, A., Corsi, S., Galeotti, G., Habekost, M., Scaramuzza, L., Kajtez, J., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2025.12.19.695615 · Cited by 1
Cen, P., Jin, C., Wang, J., Zhou, R., Zhong, Y., Tian, M., & Zhang, H. (2026) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-026-07859-6 · Cited by 1
A biointegrated living brain stimulator evokes specific neural signallingPreprint
Zhao, Q., Meng, Q., Peng, M., Lu, Z., Liu, Z. H., Jiang, X., Zheng, H., & Du, X. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.22.725279 · Cited by 1
A trial of fetal cells for Parkinson’s disease brings lessons for the field
Tabar, V. S. (2025) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-025-02742-5
Self-citationValceschini, E., Ramos, B. G., Ohnmacht, J., Ginolhac, A., Catillon, M., Gérard, D., Gaigneaux, A., Kyriakis, D., Grzyb, K., Glaab, E., et al. (2026) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2026.102930
Microphysiological Systems: Advancing Insights into Brain Development and Disorders
Yasmin, F., Cristofoletti, R., & Piñeiro-Llanes, J. (2025) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1011630
The End of the Beginning of Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Therapy
Kheolamai, P. (2025) · Asian Medical Journal and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.70933/2773-9465.1019
Human Stem Cells in Disease Modelling and Treatment: Bridging the Gap Between Bench and Bedside
Reyes, Á. P., & Calado, S. M. (2025) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines13092313
The stem cell therapy option for Parkinson’s disease
Adashi, E. Y., O’Mahony, D. P., & Cohen, I. G. (2025) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.09.012
Towards the establishment of treatments for neurodegenerative diseases using human iPSCs
Inoue, H. (2025) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2025.103132
Cell transplantation therapies in Huntington’s disease – Current status and future directions
Guiloff, A. E., & Barker, R. A. (2025) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2025.108025
Boosting dopamine: Following the lineage toward Parkinson’s repair
Parish, C. L. (2025) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2025.09.012
Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Li, L., Chen, F., Zhu, J., Cui, F., Sun, R., Ma, K., Zhao, Z., Chen, S., et al. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7903266/v1
Stem cell medicine: The shape of things to come
Adashi, E. Y., & Gruppuso, P. A. (2025) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.11.019
Bewegungsstörungen und Erkrankungen des Kleinhirns
Franke, C., Storch, A., & Kamm, C. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-3-437-21344-1.00009-9
G-protein subtype selectivity in dopamine D1 receptor
Nguyen, A. M. (2025) · Digital Repository Service (Northeastern University) · doi:10.17760/d20791815
Wünschiers, R. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-71410-2_7
„iPS-Zellen ermöglichen personalisierte Medizin für ultraseltene Erkrankungen“
Müller, T. (2026) · InFo Neurologie + Psychiatrie · doi:10.1007/s15005-026-4626-2
MODERN APPROACHES TO THE PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE
Fedorov, V., Вдовиченко, В. П., Станиславович, П. С., Николаевич, В. Н., Константинович, К. М., Аршинов, А. В., Романычева, А. А., & Suleymanov, S. S. (2026) · Problems of Biological Medical and Pharmaceutical Chemistry · doi:10.29296/25877313-2026-01-06
Metadata
- Authors
- Tabar, V., Sarva, H., Lozano, A. M., Fasano, A., Kalia, S. K., Yu, K. K. H., Brennan, C., Ma, Y., Peng, S., Eidelberg, D., Tomishima, M., Irion, S., Stemple, W., Abid, N., Lampron, A., Studer, L., & Henchcliffe, C.
- Affiliations
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- University Health Network (CA)
- Feinstein Institute for Medical Research (US)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tabar, V.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2025-04-16
- Volume
- 641
- Issue
- 8064
- Pages
- 978-983
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC12095069
- OpenAlex
- W4409502153
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 124 · 2025: 57
- FWCI
- 97.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (P30CA008748)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS118067)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
- Keywords
- Parkinson's disease, human embryonic stem cells, dopaminergic neurons, cell therapy, graft survival, dyskinesia, safety
- MeSH terms
- Human Embryonic Stem Cells, Adult, Aged, Female, Graft Survival, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Putamen, Cohort Studies, Cryopreservation, Treatment Outcome, Stem Cell Transplantation, Positron-Emission Tomography, Dopaminergic Neurons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review