Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selective vulnerability of preterm white matter to oxidative damage defined by F2‐isoprostanes

Back, Stephen A., Luo, Ning Ling, Mallinson, Rebecca A., O'Malley, Jean P., Wallen, Linda D., Frei, Balz, Morrow, Jason D., Petito, Carol K., Roberts, Charles T., Murdoch, Geoffrey H., Montine, Thomas J.·2005·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Periventricular white matter injury (PWMI) is the leading cause of cerebral palsy and chronic neurological disability in survivors of prematurity. Despite the large number of affected children, the pathogenetic mechanisms related to PWMI remain controversial. Through studies of 33 human autopsy brains, we determined that early PWMI was related to oxidative damage that particularly targeted the oligodendrocyte lineage, whereas other neuronal and glial cell types were markedly more resistant. F 2‐isoprostanes, an arachidinate metabolite/lipid peroxidation marker of oxidative damage, were significantly increased in early PWMI lesions but not in cerebral cortex. That deleterious lipid peroxidation accompanied early PWMI was supported by similar increases in F 2‐isoprostanes levels in the cerebral cortex from term infants with hypoxic‐ischemic cortical injury. Detection of F 4‐neuroprostanes, a neuronal‐specific oxidative damage marker, confirmed that neuroaxonal elements were resistant to injury in cerebral cortex and white matter. Significant protein nitration was not detected in PWMI lesions by 3‐nitrotyrosine staining. Significant cellular degeneration was confirmed in early PWMI lesions by terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase–mediated dUTP nick end labeling and a marked depletion of oligodendrocyte progenitors of 71 ± 8%. Hence, the predilection of preterm infants for PWMI is related to selective lipid peroxidation–mediated injury of cerebral white matter and targeted death of oligodendrocyte progenitors. Ann Neurol 2005;58:108–120

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.20530

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 234

Metadata

Authors
Back, S. A., Luo, N. L., Mallinson, R. A., O'Malley, J. P., Wallen, L. D., Frei, B., Morrow, J. D., Petito, C. K., Roberts, C. T., Murdoch, G. H., & Montine, T. J.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-06-27
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
108-120
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2170398304
Cited by
234
References
4
FWCI
10.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective vulnerability of preterm white matter to oxidative damage defined by F2‐isoprostanes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.20530
The paper
Back, S. A., Luo, N. L., Mallinson, R. A., O'Malley, J. P., Wallen, L. D., Frei, B., Morrow, J. D., Petito, C. K., Roberts, C. T., Murdoch, G. H., & Montine, T. J. (2005). Selective vulnerability of preterm white matter to oxidative damage defined by F2‐isoprostanes. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20530

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.