Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

No increase of calcitonin gene–related peptide in jugular blood during migraine

Tvedskov, Jesper Filtenborg, Lipka, Kerstin, Ashina, Messoud, Iversen, Helle K., Schifter, Søren, Olesen, Jes·2005·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Increased calcitonin gene–related peptide (CGRP) in external jugular venous blood during migraine attack is one of the most cited findings in the headache literature. The finding has not been convincingly reproduced and is based on comparison with historic control subjects. The validity of this finding is important for the understanding of migraine. We therefore investigated the issue using an intrapatient comparison design and two different CGRP assays. We sampled blood from the external jugular and cubital vein during, as well as outside of, an attack of migraine without aura. We succeeded in 17 patients, whereas only cubital fossa blood could be sampled in an additional 4 patients. CGRP was measured with the same assay as most previous studies (assay I) and furthermore with a more sensitive and validated assay (assay II). For assay I, mean CGRP concentration in external jugular venous blood during attack was 17.18pmol/L compared with 15.88pmol/L outside of attack. Mean difference was 1.81pmol/L (95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.88, 6.41; p = 0.44). In peripheral blood during attack, CGRP was 16.86pmol/L compared with 17.57pmol/L outside of attack. Mean difference was −0.79pmol/L (95% CI: −4.64, 3.06; p = 0.69). For assay II, external jugular venous blood concentration of CGRP during attack was 32.59pmol/L compared with 30.59pmol/L outside of attack; mean difference was 2.00pmol/L (standard error, 2.39; 95% CI: −3.07, 7.07; p = 0.416). In peripheral blood during attack, CGRP was 33.37pmol/L compared with 31.84pmol/L outside of attack; mean difference was 1.53pmol/L (standard error, 1.90; 95% CI: −2.46, 5.51; p = 0.431). Thus, no difference between CGRP level in external jugular or cubital fossa blood during and outside of attack was found. No difference was found between external jugular and peripheral venous blood. Thus, previous findings of increased CGRP level in external jugular or cubital fossa venous blood could not be confirmed. Our finding strongly suggests that CGRP is not increased in jugular venous blood during migraine without aura. CGRP cannot be used as a biomarker to validate human or animal models of migraine. Ann Neurol 2005;58:561–568

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.20605

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 199

Metadata

Authors
Tvedskov, J. F., Lipka, K., Ashina, M., Iversen, H. K., Schifter, S., & Olesen, J.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-09-21
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
561-568
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2105487631
Cited by
199
References
0
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: No increase of calcitonin gene–related peptide in jugular blood during migraine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.20605
The paper
Tvedskov, J. F., Lipka, K., Ashina, M., Iversen, H. K., Schifter, S., & Olesen, J. (2005). No increase of calcitonin gene–related peptide in jugular blood during migraine. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20605

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.