Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 983

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized controlled trial of intraputamenal glial cell line–derived neurotrophic factor infusion in Parkinson disease

Lang, Anthony E., Gill, Steven, Patel, Nik K., Lozano, Andres, Nutt, John G., Penn, Richard, Brooks, David J., Hotton, Gary, Moro, Elena, Heywood, Peter, Brodsky, Matthew A., Burchiel, Kim, Kelly, Patrick, Dalvi, Arif, Scott, Burton, Stacy, Mark, Turner, Dennis, Wooten, V. G. Frederich, Elias, William J., Laws, Edward R., Dhawan, Vijay, Stoessl, A. Jon, Matcham, James, Coffey, Robert J., Traub, Michael·2006·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: Glial cell line–derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) exerts potent trophic influence on midbrain dopaminergic neurons. This randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to confirm initial clinical benefits observed in a small, open‐label trial using intraputamenal (Ipu) infusion of recombinant human GDNF (liatermin). Methods: Thirty‐four PD patients were randomized 1 to 1 to receive bilateral continuous Ipu infusion of liatermin 15μg/putamen/day or placebo. The primary end point was the change in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score in the practically defined off condition at 6 months. Secondary end points included other UPDRS scores, motor tests, dyskinesia ratings, patient diaries, and 18 F‐dopa uptake. Results: At 6 months, mean percentage changes in “off” UPDRS motor score were −10.0% and −4.5% in the liatermin and placebo groups, respectively. This treatment difference was not significant (95% confidence interval, −23.0 to 12.0, p = 0.53). Secondary end point results were similar between the groups. A 32.5% treatment difference favoring liatermin in mean 18 F‐dopa influx constant (p = 0.019) was observed. Serious, device‐related adverse events required surgical repositioning of catheters in two patients and removal of devices in another. Neutralizing antiliatermin antibodies were detected in three patients (one on‐study and two in the open‐label extension). Interpretation: Liatermin did not confer the predetermined level of clinical benefit to patients with PD despite increased 18 F‐dopa uptake. It is uncertain whether technical differences between this trial and positive open‐label studies contributed in any way this negative outcome. Ann Neurol 2006

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.20737

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 983

Metadata

Authors
Lang, A. E., Gill, S., Patel, N. K., Lozano, A., Nutt, J. G., Penn, R., Brooks, D. J., Hotton, G., Moro, E., Heywood, P., Brodsky, M. A., Burchiel, K., Kelly, P., Dalvi, A., Scott, B., Stacy, M., Turner, D., Wooten, V. G. F., Elias, W. J., Laws, E. R., Dhawan, V., Stoessl, A. J., Matcham, J., Coffey, R. J., & Traub, M.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-02-17
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
459-466
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W1991208841
Cited by
983
References
17
FWCI
48.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized controlled trial of intraputamenal glial cell line–derived neurotrophic factor infusion in Parkinson disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.20737
The paper
Lang, A. E., Gill, S., Patel, N. K., Lozano, A., Nutt, J. G., Penn, R., Brooks, D. J., Hotton, G., Moro, E., Heywood, P., Brodsky, M. A., Burchiel, K., Kelly, P., Dalvi, A., Scott, B., Stacy, M., Turner, D., Wooten, V. G. F., Elias, W. J., . . . Traub, M. (2006). Randomized controlled trial of intraputamenal glial cell line–derived neurotrophic factor infusion in Parkinson disease. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20737

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.