Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biochemical and pathological characterization of Lrrk2

Giasson, Benoit I., Covy, Jason P., Bonini, Nancy M., Hurtig, Howard I., Farrer, Matthew J., Trojanowski, John Q., Van Deerlin, Vivianna M.·2006·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: Mutations in leucine‐rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) recently have been identified as the most common genetic cause of late‐onset sporadic and familial Parkinson's disease (PD). The studies herein explore the biological and pathological properties of Lrrk2. Methods: Genetic analysis was performed to identify autopsied patients with the most common Lrrk2 mutation (G2019S). Using an antibody specific to Lrrk2, the biochemical and immunocytochemical distribution of Lrrk2 was assessed. Results: Three patients with the G2019S Lrrk2 mutation were identified. Two patients demonstrated classic PD with Lewy bodies, although concurrent pathological changes consistent with Alzheimer's disease were also present in one of these individuals. The third patient was characterized by parkinsonism without Lewy bodies but demonstrated dystrophic neurites in the substantia nigra intensely stained for Lrrk2. Lrrk2 accumulations were unique to this patient and Lrrk2 was not detected in other types of pathological inclusions. Biochemical analysis showed that Lrrk2 is predominantly a soluble approximately 250kDa cytoplasmic protein expressed throughout the brain but also in many other organs. Interpretation: The reasons for the selective predisposition of patients with mutations in LRRK2 to develop parkinsonism remains unclear, but Lrrk2 mutations may prime select neuronal populations to cellular insults that can lead to aberrant protein aggregation. Ann Neurol 2006;59:315–322

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.20791

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 238

Metadata

Authors
Giasson, B. I., Covy, J. P., Bonini, N. M., Hurtig, H. I., Farrer, M. J., Trojanowski, J. Q., & Van Deerlin, V. M.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-01-25
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
315-322
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2021209363
Cited by
238
References
2
FWCI
17.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biochemical and pathological characterization of Lrrk2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.20791
The paper
Giasson, B. I., Covy, J. P., Bonini, N. M., Hurtig, H. I., Farrer, M. J., Trojanowski, J. Q., & Van Deerlin, V. M. (2006). Biochemical and pathological characterization of Lrrk2. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20791

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.