The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Results of treatment changes in patients with apparently drug‐resistant chronic epilepsy
Abstract
Objective: It has long been known that the response to treatment in newly diagnosed epilepsy is better than in chronic epilepsy. However, in the past 15 years, 8 major new antiepileptic drugs have been licensed, and the effect of this wider range of treatment options on prognosis has not been fully assessed. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of adding a previously unused antiepileptic drug to the treatment regimen in adults with uncontrolled chronic epilepsy that had been resistant to previous antiepileptic drug treatment. Methods: A total of 265 drug additions were studied in 155 adult patients with chronic epilepsy (defined as epilepsy active at least 5 years after and initiation of therapy). Results: About 16% of all drug introductions resulted in seizure freedom (defined as seizure freedom at last follow‐up for 12 months or longer), and a 50 to 99% seizure reduction occurred in a further 21%. Of the 155 patients, 28% were rendered seizure free by a drug introduction. Clinical factors associated with a better effect were fewer previously used antiepileptic drugs, shorter duration epilepsy, and idiopathic epilepsy. Interpretation: This study provides a quantitative estimate of the value of changing drug therapy in patients in whom seizures were previously uncontrolled by previous therapy. The application of a systematic protocol to the treatment of chronic epilepsy will improve seizure control in a substantial proportion of cases. The rather nihilistic view that intractability is inevitable if seizure control is not obtained within a few years of the onset of therapy is incorrect. Ann Neurol 2007
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early Identification of Refractory Epilepsy
Kwan, P., & Brodie, M. J. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200002033420503 · Cited by 5,204
Cited by
Kwan, P., Arzimanoglou, A., Berg, A. T., Brodie, M. J., Allen Hauser, W., Mathern, G., Moshé, S. L., Perucca, E., Wiebe, S., & French, J. (2010) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02397.x · Cited by 4,877
The natural history and prognosis of epilepsy
Beghi, E., Giussani, G., & Sander, J. W. (2015) · Epileptic Disorders · doi:10.1684/epd.2015.0751 · Cited by 268
Management of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy
Nair, D. R. (2016) · Continuum · doi:10.1212/con.0000000000000297 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Luciano, A. L., & Shorvon, S. D.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 375-381
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2105359051
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Results of treatment changes in patients with apparently drug‐resistant chronic epilepsy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.21064
- The paper
- Luciano, A. L., & Shorvon, S. D. (2007). Results of treatment changes in patients with apparently drug‐resistant chronic epilepsy. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21064
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.