The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hematoma resolution as a target for intracerebral hemorrhage treatment: Role for peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor γ in microglia/macrophages
Abstract
Objective: Phagocytosis is necessary to eliminate the hematoma after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH); however, release of proinflammatory mediators and free radicals during phagocyte activation is toxic to neighboring cells, leading to secondary brain injury. Promotion of phagocytosis in a timely and efficient manner may limit the toxic effects of persistent blood products on surrounding tissue and may be important for recovery after ICH. Methods: Intrastriatal blood injection in rodents and primary microglia in culture exposed to red blood cells were used to model ICH and to study mechanisms of hematoma resolution and phagocytosis regulation by peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor γ (PPARγ) in microglia/macrophages. Results: Our study demonstrated that the PPARγ agonist, rosiglitazone, promoted hematoma resolution, decreased neuronal damage, and improved functional recovery in a mouse ICH model. Microglia isolated from murine brains showed more efficient phagocytosis in response to PPARγ activators. PPARγ activators significantly increased PPARγ‐regulated gene (catalase and CD36) expression, whereas reducing proinflammatory gene (tumor necrosis factor‐α, interleukin‐1β, matrix metalloproteinase‐9, and inducible nitric oxide synthase) expression, extracellular H 2 O 2 level, and neuronal damage. Phagocytosis by microglia was significantly inhibited by PPARγ gene knockdown or neutralizing anti‐CD36 antibody, whereas it was enhanced by exogenous catalase. Interpretation: PPARγ in macrophages acts as an important factor in promoting hematoma absorption and protecting other brain cells from ICH‐induced damage. Ann Neurol 2007;61:352–362
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ is a negative regulator of macrophage activation
Ricote, M., Li, A. C., Willson, T. M., Kelly, C. J., & Glass, C. K. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/34178 · Cited by 3,525
Cited by
Microglial and macrophage polarization—new prospects for brain repair
Hu, X., Leak, R. K., Shi, Y., Suenaga, J., Gao, Y., Zheng, P., & Chen, J. (2015) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2014.207 · Cited by 1,366
Intracerebral haemorrhage: mechanisms of injury and therapeutic targets
Keep, R. F., Hua, Y., & Xi, G. (2012) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70104-7 · Cited by 1,308
Modulators of microglial activation and polarization after intracerebral haemorrhage
Lan, X., Han, X., Li, Q., Yang, Q.-W., & Wang, J. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2017.69 · Cited by 915
Microglia Phenotypes in Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Wendimu, M. Y., & Hooks, S. B. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11132091 · Cited by 336
Lin, S., Yin, Q., Zhong, Q., Lv, F.-L., Zhou, Y., Li, J.-Q., Wang, J.-Z., Su, B.-Y., & Yang, Q.-W. (2012) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/1742-2094-9-46 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, X., Sun, G., Zhang, J., Strong, R., Song, W., Gonzales, N., Grotta, J. C., & Aronowski, J.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 352-362
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2091142824
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hematoma resolution as a target for intracerebral hemorrhage treatment: Role for peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor γ in microglia/macrophages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.21097
- The paper
- Zhao, X., Sun, G., Zhang, J., Strong, R., Song, W., Gonzales, N., Grotta, J. C., & Aronowski, J. (2007). Hematoma resolution as a target for intracerebral hemorrhage treatment: Role for peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor γ in microglia/macrophages. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21097
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.