Health‐related quality of life in multiple sclerosis: effects of natalizumab
Abstract
Objective To report the relationship between disease activity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in relapsing multiple sclerosis, and the impact of natalizumab. Methods HRQoL data were available from 2,113 multiple sclerosis patients in natalizumab clinical studies. In the Natalizumab Safety and Efficacy in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (AFFIRM) study, patients received natalizumab 300 mg (n = 627) or placebo (n = 315); in the Safety and Efficacy of Natalizumab in Combination with Interferon Beta-1a in Patients with Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (SENTINEL) study, patients received interferon beta-1a (IFN-beta-1a) plus natalizumab 300 mg (n = 589), or IFN-beta-1a plus placebo (n = 582). The Short Form-36 (SF-36) and a subject global assessment visual analog scale were administered at baseline and weeks 24, 52, and 104. Prespecified analyses included changes from baseline to week 104 in SF-36 and visual analog scale scores. Odds ratios for clinically meaningful improvement or worsening on the SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary were calculated. Results Mean baseline SF-36 scores were significantly less than the general US population and correlated with Expanded Disability Status Scale scores, sustained disability progression, relapse number, and increased volume of brain magnetic resonance imaging lesions. Natalizumab significantly improved SF-36 PCS and Mental Component Summary scores at week 104 in AFFIRM. PCS changes…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many disease-modifying drug regimens appear to produce modest or no improvements in HRQOL or even negative changes.
“many disease-modifying drug regimens appear to produce modest or no improvements in HRQOL7,11–14 or even negative changes.15”
From MS quality of life, depression, and fatigue improve after mindfulness training: A randomized trial (2010) · cites this paper as [14]
HRQOL has gained increasing status as a metric of treatment effectiveness.
“although HRQOL has gained increasing status as a metric of treatment effectiveness.11–14,20”
From MS quality of life, depression, and fatigue improve after mindfulness training: A randomized trial (2010) · cites this paper as [14]
Cites
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011 · see citing works
Norman, G. R., Sloan, J. A., & Wyrwich, K. W. (2003) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000062554.74615.4c · Cited by 4,700 · see citing works
Zivadinov, R., Zorzon, M., Tommasi, M. A., Nasuelli, D., Bernardi, M., Monti-Bragadin, L., & Cazzato, G. (2003) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0022-510x(03)00225-9 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MS quality of life, depression, and fatigue improve after mindfulness training: A randomized trial
Grossman, P., Kappos, L., Gensicke, H., D'Souza, M., Mohr, D. C., Penner, I. K., & Steiner, C. (2010) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181f4d80d · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Self-citationMäurer, M., Comi, G., Freedman, M. S., Kappos, L., Olsson, T. P., Wolinsky, J. S., Miller, A. E., Dive-Pouletty, C., Bozzi, S., & O’Connor, P. W. (2016) · Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.msard.2016.02.012 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Rudick, R. A., Miller, D., Hass, S., Hutchinson, M., Calabresi, P. A., Confavreux, C., Galetta, S. L., Giovannoni, G., Havrdova, E., Kappos, L., Lublin, F. D., Miller, D. H., O'Connor, P. W., Phillips, J. T., Polman, C. H., Radue, E., Stuart, W. H., Wajgt, A., Weinstock‐Guttman, B., Wynn, D. R., Lynn, F., & Panzara, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- University College Dublin (IE)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Hôpital Pierre Wertheimer (FR)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
- University of Basel (CH)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
- Texas Neurology (US)
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Multiple Sclerosis Center of Atlanta (US)
- Medical University of Silesia (PL)
- Jacobs Institute (US)
- Consultants in Neurology (US)
- Biogen (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rudick, Richard A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 335-346
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2032017965
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 12.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
- Keywords
- relapsing multiple sclerosis, natalizumab, health-related quality of life, interferon beta-1a, disease activity, disability progression, brain lesions, SF-36, visual analogue scale
- MeSH terms
- Natalizumab, Adult, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Double-Blind Method, Female, Health Status, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Multiple Sclerosis, Pain, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review