Cited by 195Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifePolyomavirus and related diseases

Health‐related quality of life in multiple sclerosis: effects of natalizumab

Rudick, Richard A., Miller, Deborah, Hass, Steve, Hutchinson, Michael, Calabresi, Peter A., Confavreux, Christian, Galetta, Steven L., Giovannoni, Gavin +14 more·2007·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective To report the relationship between disease activity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in relapsing multiple sclerosis, and the impact of natalizumab. Methods HRQoL data were available from 2,113 multiple sclerosis patients in natalizumab clinical studies. In the Natalizumab Safety and Efficacy in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (AFFIRM) study, patients received natalizumab 300 mg (n = 627) or placebo (n = 315); in the Safety and Efficacy of Natalizumab in Combination with Interferon Beta-1a in Patients with Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (SENTINEL) study, patients received interferon beta-1a (IFN-beta-1a) plus natalizumab 300 mg (n = 589), or IFN-beta-1a plus placebo (n = 582). The Short Form-36 (SF-36) and a subject global assessment visual analog scale were administered at baseline and weeks 24, 52, and 104. Prespecified analyses included changes from baseline to week 104 in SF-36 and visual analog scale scores. Odds ratios for clinically meaningful improvement or worsening on the SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary were calculated. Results Mean baseline SF-36 scores were significantly less than the general US population and correlated with Expanded Disability Status Scale scores, sustained disability progression, relapse number, and increased volume of brain magnetic resonance imaging lesions. Natalizumab significantly improved SF-36 PCS and Mental Component Summary scores at week 104 in AFFIRM. PCS changes…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.21163

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rudick, R. A., Miller, D., Hass, S., Hutchinson, M., Calabresi, P. A., Confavreux, C., Galetta, S. L., Giovannoni, G., Havrdova, E., Kappos, L., Lublin, F. D., Miller, D. H., O'Connor, P. W., Phillips, J. T., Polman, C. H., Radue, E., Stuart, W. H., Wajgt, A., Weinstock‐Guttman, B., Wynn, D. R., Lynn, F., & Panzara, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Hôpital Pierre Wertheimer (FR)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • Texas Neurology (US)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Multiple Sclerosis Center of Atlanta (US)
  • Medical University of Silesia (PL)
  • Jacobs Institute (US)
  • Consultants in Neurology (US)
  • Biogen (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Rudick, Richard A.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-10
Volume
62
Issue
4
Pages
335-346
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2032017965
Cited by
195
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 19
FWCI
12.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
Keywords
relapsing multiple sclerosis, natalizumab, health-related quality of life, interferon beta-1a, disease activity, disability progression, brain lesions, SF-36, visual analogue scale
MeSH terms
Natalizumab, Adult, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Double-Blind Method, Female, Health Status, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Multiple Sclerosis, Pain, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review