Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 598

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cutaneous allodynia in the migraine population

Open access
Lipton, Richard B., Bigal, Marcelo E., Ashina, Sait, Burstein, Rami, Silberstein, Stephen, Reed, Michael L., Serrano, Daniel, Stewart, Walter F., American Migraine Prevalence Prevention Advisory Group·2008·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate a questionnaire for assessing cutaneous allodynia (CA), and to estimate the prevalence and severity of CA in the migraine population. Methods: Migraineurs (n = 11,388) completed the Allodynia Symptom Checklist, assessing the frequency of allodynia symptoms during headache. Response options were never (0), rarely (0), less than 50% of the time (1), ≥50% of the time (2), and none (0). We used item response theory to explore how well each item discriminated CA. The relations of CA to headache features were examined. Results: All 12 questions had excellent item properties. The greatest discrimination occurred with CA during “taking a shower” (discrimination = 2.54), wearing a necklace (2.39) or ring (2.31), and exposure to heat (2.1) or cold (2.0). The factor analysis demonstrated three factors: thermal, mechanical static, and mechanical dynamic. Based on the psychometrics, we developed a scale distinguishing no CA (scores 0–2), mild (3–5), moderate (6–8), and severe (≥9). The prevalence of allodynia among migraineurs was 63.2%. Severe CA occurred in 20.4% of migraineurs. CA was associated with migraine defining features (eg, unilateral pain: odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.0–2.4; throbbing pain: odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.1–2.6; nausea: odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.1–2.6), as well as illness duration, attack frequency, and disability. Interpretation: The Allodynia Symptom Checklist measures overall allodynia and subtypes. CA affects 63% of migraineurs in the population and is associated with frequency, severity, disability, and associated symptoms of migraine. CA maps onto migraine biology. Ann Neurol 2007

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.21211

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 598

Metadata

Authors
Lipton, R. B., Bigal, M. E., Ashina, S., Burstein, R., Silberstein, S., Reed, M. L., Serrano, D., Stewart, W. F., & American Migraine Prevalence Prevention Advisory Group
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
148-158
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2096198144
Cited by
598
References
4
FWCI
10.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cutaneous allodynia in the migraine population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.21211
The paper
Lipton, R. B., Bigal, M. E., Ashina, S., Burstein, R., Silberstein, S., Reed, M. L., Serrano, D., Stewart, W. F., & American Migraine Prevalence Prevention Advisory Group. (2008). Cutaneous allodynia in the migraine population. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21211

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.