Cited by 123Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer's disease

Dal Bianco, Assunta, Bradl, Monika, Frischer, Josa, Kutzelnigg, Alexandra, Jellinger, Kurt, Lassmann, Hans·2008·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: Chronic inflammation with microglia activation is thought to play a major role in the formation or clearance of Alzheimer's disease (AD) lesions, as well as in the induction of demyelination in multiple sclerosis (MS). In MS, the cortex is severely affected by chronic, long‐lasting inflammation, microglia activation, and demyelination. To what extent chronic inflammation in the cortex of MS patients influences the development of AD lesions is so far unresolved. Methods: The study was performed on autopsy tissue of 45 MS cases, 9 AD cases, and 15 control subjects. We analyzed lymphocyte and plasma cell infiltration in relation to microglia activation, to the presence of β‐amyloid plaques and (AT8 + ) neurofibrillary tangles, and to myelin pathology. Results: Profound microglia activation, determined by a broad spectrum of markers, was found in both MS and AD cortices, and the patterns of microglia activation were closely similar. Microglia activation in MS cortex, in contrast with that in AD and control cortex, correlated with lymphocyte and plasma‐cell infiltrates in the meninges. MS cases older than 64 years experienced development of AD pathology in comparable incidence as seen in the course of normal aging. The density of β‐amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles did not differ between demyelinated and nondemyelinated cortical areas. Conclusions: Our data suggest that microglia activation in the MS cortex alone has little or no influence on the development of cortical AD pathology. Ann Neurol 2007

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.21240

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 123

Authors
Dal Bianco, A., Bradl, M., Frischer, J., Kutzelnigg, A., Jellinger, K., & Lassmann, H.
Affiliations
Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Lassmann, Hans
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
174-183
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2067644826
Cited by
123
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, microglial activation, chronic inflammation, demyelination, cortical lesions, lymphocyte infiltration, plasma cell infiltration, meningeal inflammation, amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, myelin pathology, aging
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Cerebral Arteries, Chemotaxis, Leukocyte, Encephalitis, Female, Gliosis, Humans, Male, Meninges, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Myelin Sheath, Biomarkers, Comorbidity, Neurofibrillary Tangles, Microglia, Disease Progression, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review