Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 500

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gray matter atrophy is related to long‐term disability in multiple sclerosis

Fisniku, Leonora K., Chard, Declan T., Jackson, Jonathan S., Anderson, Valerie M., Altmann, Daniel R., Miszkiel, Katherine A., Thompson, Alan J., Miller, David H.·2008·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: To determine the relation of gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) brain volumes, and WM lesion load, with clinical outcomes 20 years after first presentation with clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: Seventy‐three patients were studied a mean of 20 years from first presentation with a clinically isolated syndrome (33 of whom developed relapsing‐remitting MS and 11 secondary‐progressive MS, with the rest experiencing no further definite neurological events), together with 25 healthy control subjects. GM and WM volumetric measures were obtained from three‐dimensional T1‐weighted brain magnetic resonance images using Statistical Parametric Mapping 2. Results: Significant GM (p < 0.001) and WM atrophy (p = 0.001) was seen in MS patients compared with control subjects. There was significantly more GM, but not WM atrophy, in secondary‐progressive MS versus relapsing‐remitting MS (p = 0.003), and relapsing‐remitting MS versus clinically isolated syndrome (p < 0.001). GM, but not WM, fraction correlated with expanded disability status scale (rs = −0.48; p < 0.001) and MS Functional Composite scores (rs = 0.59; p < 0.001). WM lesion load correlated with GM (rs = −0.63; p < 0.001), but not with WM fraction. Regression modeling indicated that the GM fraction explained more of the variability in clinical measures than did WM lesion load. Interpretation: In MS patients with a relatively long and homogeneous disease duration, GM atrophy is more marked than WM atrophy, and reflects disease subtype and disability to a greater extent than WM atrophy or lesions. Ann Neurol 2008

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.21423

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 500

Metadata

Authors
Fisniku, L. K., Chard, D. T., Jackson, J. S., Anderson, V. M., Altmann, D. R., Miszkiel, K. A., Thompson, A. J., & Miller, D. H.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-06-20
Volume
64
Issue
3
Pages
247-254
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2013370381
Cited by
500
References
6
FWCI
20.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gray matter atrophy is related to long‐term disability in multiple sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.21423
The paper
Fisniku, L. K., Chard, D. T., Jackson, J. S., Anderson, V. M., Altmann, D. R., Miszkiel, K. A., Thompson, A. J., & Miller, D. H. (2008). Gray matter atrophy is related to long‐term disability in multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21423

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.