Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 433

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Anti‐JC virus antibodies: Implications for PML Risk Stratification

Gorelik, Leonid, Lerner, Michaela, Bixler, Sarah, Crossman, Mary, Schlain, Brian, Simon, Kenneth, Pace, Amy, Cheung, Anne, Chen, Ling Ling, Berman, Melissa, Zein, Fairuz, Wilson, Ewa, Yednock, Ted, Sandrock, Alfred, Goelz, Susan E., Subramanyam, Meena·2010·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: A study was undertaken to establish an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect JC virus (JCV)‐specific antibodies in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, and to evaluate its potential utility for identifying patients at higher or lower risk (ie, risk stratification) of developing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Methods: A 2‐step assay for detecting and confirming the presence of anti‐JCV antibodies in human serum and plasma was developed and demonstrated to be both sensitive and specific. ELISA cutpoints were statistically established using sera from >800 MS patients from natalizumab clinical studies. Subsequently, this assay was used to determine the presence of anti‐JCV antibodies in natalizumab‐treated PML patients where serum samples were collected 16‐180 months prior to the diagnosis of PML. Results: In our evaluation of natalizumab‐treated MS patients, 53.6% tested positive for anti‐JCV antibodies, with a 95% confidence interval of 49.9 to 57.3%. The false‐negative rate of the ELISA was calculated to be approximately 2.5%, with an upper 1‐sided confidence limit of 4.4%. Notably, we observed anti‐JCV antibodies in all 17 available pre‐PML sera samples, which was significantly different from the 53.6% seropositivity observed in the overall MS study population (p < 0.0001). Interpretation: This 2‐step assay provides a means to classify MS patients as having detectable or not detectable levels of anti‐JCV antibodies. The finding that all 17 of the pre‐PML samples that were available tested seropositive, and none tested seronegative, warrants further research on the clinical utility of the anti‐JCV antibody assay as a potential tool for stratifying MS patients for higher or lower risk of developing PML. Ann Neurol 2010

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.22128

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 433

Metadata

Authors
Gorelik, L., Lerner, M., Bixler, S., Crossman, M., Schlain, B., Simon, K., Pace, A., Cheung, A., Chen, L. L., Berman, M., Zein, F., Wilson, E., Yednock, T., Sandrock, A., Goelz, S. E., & Subramanyam, M.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-08-24
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
295-303
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W1983511886
Cited by
433
References
0
FWCI
28.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anti‐JC virus antibodies: Implications for PML Risk Stratification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.22128
The paper
Gorelik, L., Lerner, M., Bixler, S., Crossman, M., Schlain, B., Simon, K., Pace, A., Cheung, A., Chen, L. L., Berman, M., Zein, F., Wilson, E., Yednock, T., Sandrock, A., Goelz, S. E., & Subramanyam, M. (2010). Anti‐JC virus antibodies: Implications for PML Risk Stratification. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22128

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.