The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anti‐JC virus antibodies: Implications for PML Risk Stratification
Abstract
Objective: A study was undertaken to establish an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect JC virus (JCV)‐specific antibodies in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, and to evaluate its potential utility for identifying patients at higher or lower risk (ie, risk stratification) of developing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Methods: A 2‐step assay for detecting and confirming the presence of anti‐JCV antibodies in human serum and plasma was developed and demonstrated to be both sensitive and specific. ELISA cutpoints were statistically established using sera from >800 MS patients from natalizumab clinical studies. Subsequently, this assay was used to determine the presence of anti‐JCV antibodies in natalizumab‐treated PML patients where serum samples were collected 16‐180 months prior to the diagnosis of PML. Results: In our evaluation of natalizumab‐treated MS patients, 53.6% tested positive for anti‐JCV antibodies, with a 95% confidence interval of 49.9 to 57.3%. The false‐negative rate of the ELISA was calculated to be approximately 2.5%, with an upper 1‐sided confidence limit of 4.4%. Notably, we observed anti‐JCV antibodies in all 17 available pre‐PML sera samples, which was significantly different from the 53.6% seropositivity observed in the overall MS study population (p < 0.0001). Interpretation: This 2‐step assay provides a means to classify MS patients as having detectable or not detectable levels of anti‐JCV antibodies. The finding that all 17 of the pre‐PML samples that were available tested seropositive, and none tested seronegative, warrants further research on the clinical utility of the anti‐JCV antibody assay as a potential tool for stratifying MS patients for higher or lower risk of developing PML. Ann Neurol 2010
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Plavina, T., Subramanyam, M., Bloomgren, G., Richman, S., Pace, A., Lee, S., Schlain, B., Campagnolo, D., Belachew, S., & Ticho, B. (2014) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24286 · Cited by 438
Self-citationConsensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis
Yamout, B., Alroughani, R., Al-Jumah, M., Khoury, S., Abouzeid, N., Dahdaleh, M., Alsharoqi, I., Inshasi, J., Hashem, S., Zakaria, M., et al. (2013) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/03007995.2013.787979 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Gorelik, L., Lerner, M., Bixler, S., Crossman, M., Schlain, B., Simon, K., Pace, A., Cheung, A., Chen, L. L., Berman, M., Zein, F., Wilson, E., Yednock, T., Sandrock, A., Goelz, S. E., & Subramanyam, M.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-08-24
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 295-303
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W1983511886
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anti‐JC virus antibodies: Implications for PML Risk Stratification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.22128
- The paper
- Gorelik, L., Lerner, M., Bixler, S., Crossman, M., Schlain, B., Simon, K., Pace, A., Cheung, A., Chen, L. L., Berman, M., Zein, F., Wilson, E., Yednock, T., Sandrock, A., Goelz, S. E., & Subramanyam, M. (2010). Anti‐JC virus antibodies: Implications for PML Risk Stratification. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.