The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Timing of hormone therapy and dementia: The critical window theory revisited
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Although previous research has shown that initiation of postmenopausal estrogen hormone therapy (HT) in late life increases risk of dementia, animal studies and some observational studies have suggested that midlife use of HT may be beneficial; however, this has not been rigorously investigated in large population‐based studies. Our objective was to compare HT use in midlife with that in late life on risk of dementia among 5,504 postmenopausal female members of an integrated healthcare delivery system. Methods: HT use was determined at midlife (mean age, 48.7 years) from a survey in 1964 and in late life (mean age, 76 years) using pharmacy databases from 1994 to 1998. Risk of dementia diagnosis was evaluated with inpatient and outpatient diagnoses made in Neurology, Neuropsychology, and Internal Medicine from 1999 to 2008. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine effects of HT use at different times on dementia risk with adjustment for age, education, race, body mass index, number of children, and comorbidities. Results: A total of 1,524 women (27%) were diagnosed with dementia during the follow‐up period. Compared to women never on HT, those taking HT only at midlife had a 26% decreased risk (multivariate adjusted hazards ratio [aHR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58–0.94 ), whereas those taking HT only in late life had a 48% increased risk (aHR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.10–1.98), and women taking HT at both mid and late life had a similar risk of dementia (aHR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.78–1.34 ). Interpretation: These findings suggest that use of HT in midlife only may protect against cognitive impairment, whereas HT initiation in late life could have deleterious effects. ANN NEUROL, 2010
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Clinical epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease: assessing sex and gender differences
Mielke, M., Vemuri, P., & Rocca, W. (2014) · Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.2147/clep.s37929 · Cited by 1,021
The 2022 hormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society
(2022) · Menopause · doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000002028 · Cited by 977
2016 IMS Recommendations on women’s midlife health and menopause hormone therapy
Baber, R. J., Panay, N., & Fenton, A. (2016) · Climacteric · doi:10.3109/13697137.2015.1129166 · Cited by 964
Understanding the impact of sex and gender in Alzheimer’s disease: A call to action
Nebel, R. A., Aggarwal, N. T., Barnes, L. L., Gallagher, A., Goldstein, J. M., Kantarci, K., Mallampalli, M. P., Mormino, E. C., Scott, L., Yu, W. H., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.04.008 · Cited by 839
Estrogen: A master regulator of bioenergetic systems in the brain and body
Rettberg, J. R., Yao, J., & Brinton, R. D. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2013.08.001 · Cited by 534
Metadata
- Authors
- Whitmer, R. A., Quesenberry, C. P., Zhou, J., & Yaffe, K.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-11-12
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 163-169
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2048182526
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Timing of hormone therapy and dementia: The critical window theory revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.22239
- The paper
- Whitmer, R. A., Quesenberry, C. P., Zhou, J., & Yaffe, K. (2011). Timing of hormone therapy and dementia: The critical window theory revisited. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22239
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.