Cited by 839Sex and Gender in HealthcareDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Understanding the impact of sex and gender in Alzheimer’s disease: A call to action

Open access
Nebel, Rebecca A., Aggarwal, Neelum T., Barnes, Lisa L., Gallagher, Aimee, Goldstein, Jill M., Kantarci, Kejal, Mallampalli, Monica P., Mormino, Elizabeth C. +4 more·2018·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Precision medicine methodologies and approaches have advanced our understanding of the clinical presentation, development, progression, and management of Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia. However, sex and gender have not yet been adequately integrated into many of these approaches. METHODS: The Society for Women's Health Research Interdisciplinary Network on AD, comprised of an expert panel of scientists and clinicians, reviewed ongoing and published research related to sex and gender differences in AD. RESULTS: The current review is a result of this Network's efforts and aims to: (1) highlight the current state-of-the-science in the AD field on sex and gender differences; (2) address knowledge gaps in assessing sex and gender differences; and (3) discuss 12 priority areas that merit further research. DISCUSSION: The exclusion of sex and gender has impeded faster advancement in the detection, treatment, and care of AD across the clinical spectrum. Greater attention to these differences will improve outcomes for both sexes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.04.008

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alzheimer's disease prevalence and symptom progression are disproportionately higher in women.

    “AD disease prevalence and symptom progression are disproportionately higher in women [97,98,99].”

    From Alzheimer's Disease: Treatment Strategies and Their Limitations. (2022) · cites this paper as [98]

    The Introduction reports that more women than men live with an AD diagnosis, but distinguishes that count from prevalence: studies of sex differences in prevalence are mixed, and a global meta-analysis found no significant difference. The Clinical presentation section reports faster cognitive and clinical decline among women with MCI, supporting the progression part of the claim for that group, not as an unqualified statement about all women with AD. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sex is a strong factor underlying phenotypic variability in AD.

    “As sex is a strong factor underlying phenotypic variability in AD”
  • Sex differences have been observed in the progression, diagnosis, and clinical presentations of AD.

    “Despite the mixed findings from these incidence studies, sex differences have been observed in the progression, diagnosis, and clinical presentations of AD.”
  • In adults over 65, the risk of AD in women is twice as high as in men.

    “In the Framingham Study cohort, a study conducted in individuals aged between 65 and 100 years old, incidence of AD in women was twice as high as men [41]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 143 · Cited by 839

Authors
Nebel, R. A., Aggarwal, N. T., Barnes, L. L., Gallagher, A., Goldstein, J. M., Kantarci, K., Mallampalli, M. P., Mormino, E. C., Scott, L., Yu, W. H., Maki, P. M., & Mielke, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Society for Women's Health Research (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Nebel, Rebecca A.
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-06-12
Volume
14
Issue
9
Pages
1171-1183
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2808227793
Cited by
839
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 103 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 141 · 2023: 139 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 9
FWCI
10.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Novartis
  • Amgen
  • Johnson and Johnson
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, sex differences
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Gender Identity, Humans, Sex Characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review